A propos de Gamersyde
Gamersyde est un site de média-information consacré à l'actualité du jeu-vidéo consoles et PC, et spécialisé dans la production et diffusion de vidéos de haute qualité à très haut bitrate dans leur résolution et framerate d'origine. À l'heure où la compression vidéo exagérée devient de plus en plus la norme sur Internet, Gamersyde est le dernier petit village gaulois à encore résister à l'envahisseur Youtube. Toutes les vidéos sont disponibles en téléchargement et en streaming, jusqu'en 4K et 60 images par seconde dans les deux cas, et dans une qualité largement supérieure à celle de Youtube pour le streaming. Nous sommes également en mesure d'enregistrer des extraits de jeu en HDR pour les joueurs équipés d'écrans compatibles. L'intégralité de notre contenu est gratuit, et accessible en français ainsi qu'en anglais.
Patreon
Inscrit depuis 7592 Joursor
http://zdmedia.vo.llnwd.net/o1/New_Folder/GDC_1_qu...
its after the rubber duckie demo
Inscrit depuis 7548 JoursCrytek > Epic
0_o
Ok, and now my non-silly comment. Hard to compare Crytecks nice demo, which while a little nicer than the UE3 engine demo from 2004, it is also 2006. UT2007 has not inspired me much so I am not the fairest observer, but the guy playing really sucks!
I am too poor to own a 360... therefor I play with paper statistics. The results of my indepth scientific anaylisis determined the most important benchmark is Pi. As in The Ring of Light.
Inscrit depuis 7555 Jours
Inscrit depuis 7570 JoursMore like a playable weapons/movement demo, with a shitty framerate.
Oh well, I guess it's better than nothing.
Anyway, one shouldn't expect massive amounts of detail everywhere in a UT game, even if it is running on a badass engine (nor should one want all that detail... it just gets in the freakin' way).
Inscrit depuis 7555 JoursWow...the physics completely missed that part.
Inscrit depuis 7548 JoursBut as Plumb said, it really is not a demo. Just a room and a gun. I am not the biggest UT2007 art fan, but the engine is solid enough and Epic makes good UT games if you like that style. I would not worry much.
I am too poor to own a 360... therefor I play with paper statistics. The results of my indepth scientific anaylisis determined the most important benchmark is Pi. As in The Ring of Light.
Inscrit depuis 7607 Jours
Inscrit depuis 7454 JoursMost people would probably disagree with me though, especially the pc-fanboys.
But seeing this game just doesn't do anything for me, whereas GOW does....
Inscrit depuis 7570 JoursUT series (except for the first title) was never really about pushing visual boundaries.
The game is very focused on fast paced DM style combat, and you can't have all kinds of crazy shit happening in your field of vision, or geting in your way, because the style of play is already extremely fast and sometimes confusing.
The fact that each UT game has been among the best looking titles of their time though is really attributed to the fact that Epic make and update a great engine that is usually toward the forefront of technology.
The fans already had a field day with UT2003 and it's over-the-top use of static meshes and "snaggy" architecture... something Epic (mostly) remedied in UT2004.
This series is all about gameplay, even if it doubles as an engine showcase at times.
Gears is in a different league stylistically.
It's not a fair comparison.
Still, I wish they would have went ahead with UC3 for consoles... leave the UT's on PC's.
(maybe the project is so big they just wouldn't have room for developing 3 concurrent titles; would make sense)
Inscrit depuis 7454 JoursAnd I just can't see that...
Inscrit depuis 7577 JoursUT series (except for the first title) was never really about pushing visual boundaries.
The game is very focused on fast paced DM style combat, and you can't have all kinds of crazy shit happening in your field of vision, or geting in your way, because the style of play is already extremely fast and sometimes confusing.
The fact that each UT game has been among the best looking titles of their time though is really attributed to the fact that Epic make and update a great engine that is usually toward the forefront of technology.
The fans already had a field day with UT2003 and it's over-the-top use of static meshes and "snaggy" architecture... something Epic (mostly) remedied in UT2004.
This series is all about gameplay, even if it doubles as an engine showcase at times.
Gears is in a different league stylistically.
It's not a fair comparison.
Still, I wish they would have went ahead with UC3 for consoles... leave the UT's on PC's.
(maybe the project is so big they just wouldn't have room for developing 3 concurrent titles; would make sense)
Inscrit depuis 7570 JoursAnd I just can't see that...
But UT2007 is looking beautiful.
Inscrit depuis 7538 JoursMost people would probably disagree with me though, especially the pc-fanboys.
But seeing this game just doesn't do anything for me, whereas GOW does....
Inscrit depuis 7548 JoursI am too poor to own a 360... therefor I play with paper statistics. The results of my indepth scientific anaylisis determined the most important benchmark is Pi. As in The Ring of Light.
Inscrit depuis 7454 JoursBut UT2007 is looking beautiful.
And indeed, with this game the nice graphics is just a plus, rather than a must...
Inscrit depuis 7505 JoursI am the pwnage
Inscrit depuis 7607 JoursThey supposedly had UE3 running perfectly on even the early devkits last year (the scene with the guy running from the robot down a hallway) but this is a far smaller environment with no visible characters and an apparent graphical downgrade and it chugs like a bitch..
Inscrit depuis 7555 JoursWhat were they running this demo on anyway? The PS3 people are saying its the actual PS3 hardware or something.
Inscrit depuis 7422 JoursI dream in 1080p
Inscrit depuis 7697 Jours
Inscrit depuis 8214 JoursP.s. UT2007 (on the PC!!) will rule!!
www.cyberwarriors.nl