| Forums-> Main forum-> Brothers in Arms 3 Developer interview gives his opinion on 360, PS3, and Revo as well.: << 1 2 |
| Author | Message |
| Jollipop Since 1423 Days |
2006-04-14 17:13:11 LOL ... talk about off topic .. |
| QuezcatoL Since 1592 Days |
2006-04-14 17:24:57 Well,everyone has their right to their opinion,if you doesnt like ff7,you have the right to do so it doesnt suit everyone,nor does starcraft/half lif2 etc,however ,i doesnt think some american sites are the ones to only listen to and then ignoring what the european/japanese sites thinks... |
| Acert93 Mr. Bad Cop Since 1510 Days |
2006-04-14 17:50:53 Posted by Quez But you fail to get what i mean I also said that one of the site gaved ff7 6/10 and said he doesnt even like rpgs your not the smartest guy around ;) Okay,cause i though gamespot gaved tony hawk 10/10 and Chrono Cross 10/10 and IGN for ex Gaved Jade empire 10/10,but thats fair right? :P Btw, the games you mention were all very, very good at the time of release and shone on their platform. It is not unthinkable among a survey of 100 people that some would really, really like them. What does this have to do with FFX not being a AAA title? then i could say every american score is worthless and only european/japanse is worth to read, by using your logic :P Anyhow, so how again is FFX not a AAA title? --- |
| Acert93 Mr. Bad Cop Since 1510 Days |
2006-04-14 18:11:12 In reply to Jollipop (2006-04-14 17:13:11) Posted by Jollipop I don't care who thinks what, because my PSX is better than the 360 so there ... Ya know you should stop worrying about what Magazines and reviewers say and make your own damn minds up for yourselves... If FF7 wasn't the best Final Fantasy why does it continuously get brought up.. FF7 is the most famous and probably because it is considered to be the best , does that not make sense? All I see is FF7's fans dissing on other games -- even other FFs games -- to defend their game of choice. I never denied that FF7 is a great game -- or that some fans and press think it is the best FF, even the best game, ever -- but the question reolves around is FFX a AAA title, and is FF7 considered the best FF game? On the first point, yes, FFX is is universally considered AAA quality. FF7 who say otherwise obviously have other motives. They are allowing their personal preference totally discredit the evidence illogically. On the second point, without invalidating yours or Quez's opinion, the fact is a VERY large number of people -- even a majority -- consider FFX better than FF7. I am not challenging someones opinion (like I said, I disagree with a number of the top10 from ANY reviewer), but it is more than noteworthy when a game is considered "better" on average by dozens of people. This does not mean they are right, but what it does do is establish the counter position in favor of FF7 is not the consensus as often presented. To change perspectives, some people absolutely LOVED Zelda 2 (side scroller). They believed it owned Zelda 1. It is fair to say, "IMO Zelda 2 is much better than Zelda 1". But it would be completely inaccurate to say, "Zelda 1 was NOT a AAA title". If FF7 wasn't the best Final Fantasy why does it continuously get brought up.. Well not really, but I do begin to wonder when people start trashing GOOD games to defend their position. I think FF7 is one of those all time great games, a classic. And since RPGs are story based it has a propensity to win people over in a way Mario could not. Mario Revolution could blow Mario 64 away. But regardless of how great FFXV is, there will ALWAYS be people who think FF7 is better based on the story. But the question remains should such opinions, as strong as they may be, be isolated as truisms or should be broaden our perspective with a more objective survey? As an outsider, it seems more of an internal struggle when FF fans can slam FFX to "validate" their own opinion, when obviously this is not the majority position. Most gamers love both... so it makes you go "hmmm". --- |
| Acert93 Mr. Bad Cop Since 1510 Days |
2006-04-14 18:17:00 In reply to QuezcatoL (2006-04-14 17:24:57) Posted by QuezcatoL Well,everyone has their right to their opinion,if you doesnt like ff7,you have the right to do so it doesnt suit everyone,nor does starcraft/half lif2 etc,however ,i doesnt think some american sites are the ones to only listen to and then ignoring what the european/japanese sites thinks... That is just ignorant. But all this is to side step your comments that FFX, a critical success and a consumer success (nearly 8M units sold), is not a AAA title. --- |
| Jollipop Since 1423 Days |
2006-04-14 18:26:11 Well as a huge JRPG fan i think FFX was one of the most disappointing so far (FFX-2 getting the crown for that), it had nice graphics for it's time and the character design was nice, but the story was a bit crap. Is it? Empiracle evidence? My evidence would be that FF7 has spawned 2 spin off's a film and a possible remake of the original so that alone must say something for it? |
| QuezcatoL Since 1592 Days |
2006-04-14 18:45:20 You said famitsu was worthless thus you doesnt suggest listening to japans biggest magazine? |
| QuezcatoL Since 1592 Days |
2006-04-14 19:01:29 In reply to Jollipop (2006-04-14 18:26:11) Posted by Jollipop The thing is unless you are a fan of the series you probably haven't played many of them and that doesn't give that person the right to say which is best, because they don't have any clue. The newer fans,always say the latest entry is the best :P Except FF9,which some of the new gamers from ff7 and ff8 trashted,cause they thought ff serie should be as previous,and no they cant have played the earliest games,when it was about crystalls and magic. :) However FF8 is a love/hate game,most FF fans hate it though,when i say FF fans i mean the people who been in the serie. The battle system with junction was just dumb,and making monster becoming your level was also stupid,not more powerlevling,als GF abuse made every FF fan scream. Why i dislike FF10 is the way of the characters comments and look,they really feelt like,lets add in some people who look like super models and then let them run in a straight road,and then make some plot twiest in there and,btw ship airships and worldmap thats old,this is all about being fresh and new!!! yay!!! but seriously the road running in FFX really pissed me off,i never cared for the world,nor its people,nor for the characters who feelt extremeley ridicoulus. I would however score FF8 94/100 and FF10 91/100 No of those are bad rpg's its just that as a FF fan who followed the FF serie i know they could have done so much better. FF9 is pretty intresting title,it also had some love/hate,but thats because the new fans from ff7 and ff8 was expecting a game like that,and was clueless when they saw ff9,wtf is this?! Magic and crystall? medival times? Meeeeh!!! ;) ofc we fans who made the serie into what it became,liked it,however it had many flaws also,but yeah i consider ff9 better game then FF8.and FF10 ofc. |
| QuezcatoL Since 1592 Days |
2006-04-14 19:09:25 Btw iwas on gamerankings.com |
| QuezcatoL Since 1592 Days |
2006-04-14 19:33:36 Found this... |
| Acert93 Mr. Bad Cop Since 1510 Days |
2006-04-14 20:08:30 In reply to Jollipop (2006-04-14 18:26:11) Posted by Jollipop Well as a huge JRPG fan i think FFX was one of the most disappointing so far (FFX-2 getting the crown for that) Your observation is subjective. I have no problem with YOUR opinion. I am asking that YOU look outside your own preferences. The thing is unless you are a fan of the series you probably haven't played many of them and that doesn't give that person the right to say which is best, because they don't have any clue. A number of FF fans have said FF7 is overrated. It is the FF7 *fans* who are adament other peoples opinions are clueless. As a fan of FF7 you are obviously biased toward it -- so much so you are now taking the stance that FFX was a dissappointment with a crap story. That is your opinion. What I am asking is for a BROADER criteria of how was evaluate these things. e.g. IMO, lets say for my tastes HL2/CS:S is the best game of the last 5 years. And for arguments sake kets say I also think it was better than HL1. Now if I say, "HL1 was crap" and "HL1 was not a AAA title" in the context of the above -- should I not be challenged? The issue is Opinion vs. Facts I am not disagreeing with your personal opinion; I am more challenging the facts... like: FFX is not a AAA title. But as I can see, any points brought forward that FF7 may not be the best FF game (something it appears to be widely believed among gamers) gets you FF7 die hards all up in arms ;) FF7 remains my favourite in the series because of its story line and that is about all you can judge it on considering gameplay and graphics have advanced since. My evidence would be that FF7 has spawned 2 spin off's a film and a possible remake of the original so that alone must say something for it? That says it is popular and a good game -- neither of which I disagree with! Like I said before, some even consider it the best ever! RPG or otherwise. I also have demonstrated FF7 is frequently considered in the TOP 2 of FF games ALL TIME. I think you both are continueing to misunderstand me. I know Quez is more of a personal attack/inability to read. Hopefully you can understand my point. I am not denying FF7 is a great game, one of the best ever, etc. I am just pointing out the FFX hate -- from FF7 fans -- is very out of place in the big picture. You may dislike FFX (Quez does not even consider it a AAA title). I have not challenged your opinion. What I am challenging is facts. And the fact is FFX is a AAA title. FFX is also, in general and on average, considered to be on par with FF7. Like I said, I did not like Metroid Prime much for various reasons. That does not prevent me from appreciating it in the context of the market, its quality, and what it means to gamers. I am just prodding FF7 fans to put aside their own opinion for the big picture. Alas, asking gamers to judge a game outside their OWN bias is very difficult. Btw, for the record, I have played FF7. Never finished it, but I have played it. Darn good game. Of course GoldenEye prevented me from fully appreciating it ;) --- |
| Acert93 Mr. Bad Cop Since 1510 Days |
2006-04-14 20:23:53 In reply to QuezcatoL (2006-04-14 18:45:20) Posted by QuezcatoL You said famitsu was worthless thus you doesnt suggest listening to japans biggest magazine? By being the biggest magazine japanes gamers buy it cause they agree with their reviews and opinions,you on the othr hand said the magazine was worthless. And then saying you never indicate not to listening japanese magazines... Even though famitsu is way way way bigger then anything close in japan. Now your saying against yourself. What I said was true. Famitsu is not generally relied upon for review accuracy due to certain quarks in Japanese culture. I did NOT say it is to be totally disregarded -- only that Famitsu should not be viewed as overriding dozens of other reviewers opinions. They should get one voice, like anyone else. Anyway, here is my last points,Dont use gamerankings as some holy bible, cause its not,they doesnt include the biggest european magazines nor the japanese. Instead see it as how the america media looked on some games,or mayby you think their NFL game is the 10 th best game ever made.?! 1) Sports are one of the biggest genres 2) Football is the biggest selling sports game every year 3) Sports games rely heavily on gameplay mechanics, features, and longevity and have a lot of replay 4) Resonate well with fans You continue to attack one of the BEST games ever. When NFL 2K series was launched it was universally praised. It added a ton of depth and gameplay to an already thriving genre. Contemperously, that NFL game was absolutely awesome. The fact you keep slamming Americans and the American press and a game sub-genre (Sports-Football) that sells over 6M units a year is confusing. If a Soccer game was revolutionary and played great and was praised by the press -- does the fact European and Japanese press outlets praising it negate that it is a good game??! It reminds me of a time when RPGs were NOT brought to the US. Why? Because Americans did not buy them. Did that make RPGs of lesser quality? No, it just meant American tastes had not developed yet. Of course that appears to be too sensible of a position... --- |
| Acert93 Mr. Bad Cop Since 1510 Days |
2006-04-14 20:26:07 In reply to QuezcatoL (2006-04-14 19:33:36) Posted by QuezcatoL GameFAQs held a contest The problem is you seem to have a problem accepting that many people think FFX was even better. Still waiting to hear why FFX, factually, was not a AAA title. --- |
| Jollipop Since 1423 Days |
2006-04-14 20:37:37 I think you forget that the market size at the time of FF7 was a lot smaller than when FFX was released, and many of these "new fans to the series/new fans to the PS2" haven't played FF7. You are the minority as pointed out. I am also saying that as a Final Fantasy fan and so is Quezcatol that we don't think FF7 is over rated so it depends intirely on the individuals opinion.(which you agree on) Basing a series/game on someone elses opinion is pointless. As a fan of FF7 you are obviously biased toward it -- so much so you are now taking the stance that FFX was a dissappointment with a crap story. That is your opinion. What I am asking is for a BROADER criteria of how was evaluate these things. e.g I'm not paticularlly a fan boy of FF7, I thought Shenmue was better and i'm sure many FF7 fans would disagree with me, this is the thing with opinions everyone has a different one. I understand what you are saying to some degree, it really despends on your definition of AAA, does AAA = sales or AAA = an awesome game. Also if you look at FF12 it sold 2.2 million in it's first couple of weeks so in that case FF12 is the best Final Fantasy of the series. A lot of the people who bought FF12 didn't know what to expect from the game, some love it, some hate it. But sales don't mean a game is a good as the above example would prove.(not saying FF12 isn't a good game) I think any FF (with a number behind it) could be considered a AAA title. |
| Jollipop Since 1423 Days |
2006-04-14 20:44:48 The problem is you seem to have a problem accepting that many people think FFX was even better. |
| lumzi23 Since 1525 Days |
2006-04-14 21:07:22 In reply to QuezcatoL (2006-04-14 15:04:56) Posted by QuezcatoL But you fail to get what i mean,i said,europeans and japanese gaming sites and magazines arn't in there doesnt matter if they have 1 or 2 european when every freaking country has one magazine that is as big,and the biggest of them all(famitsu) isnt in there,they rather have small american sites then bigger japanese or europans,and yourself said famitsu score is worthless,then i could say every american score is worthless and only european/japanse is worth to read, by using your logic :P I also said that one of the site gaved ff7 6/10 and said he doesnt even like rpgs if you call him a real critic or anything close to it,your not the smartest guy around ;) Nah,take away the biggest gaming magazine as famitsu and instead add some more reviews of him and add it at gamerankings.com My point was this,these sites focus on american reviews and score,why do you think you cant see a soccer game in the score? Trust me,if soccer was as big as in USA as in the rest of the world,NFL wouldnä't be there but a soccer game would. "As for Famitsu, their scores are actually pretty worthless. A bad score from Famitsu means a game is bad, but they also give out a lot of very high scores to crappy games. Pretty well established fact :( Edge is a quality magazine, it is sad their American sister mag, Next-Generation, went down." Okay,cause i though gamespot gaved tony hawk 10/10 and Chrono Cross 10/10 and IGN for ex Gaved Jade empire 10/10,but thats fair right? :P But i guess its also depend on what the people like and want,in japan rpg's are much more liked,while in usa action/fps or racing is more wanted... And critics are just normal people no matter what they say,atleast one of the americans reviewers was honest and said he doesnt even like rpgs when reviewed ff7. But im sure some japanse reviwers is also hostile to some FPS i mean when i looked at the topp 100 of all time by japanese people,50+ in the list was basically rpgs... Anyway Its all a matter of taste,i listen to european and japanese magazines cause i agree with their taste,and there FF7 is topp 5,however you listen to your american sites,where a NFL is ranked top 10 of all time, ;) bye! Anyway, Famitsu is an eastern magazine and gamerankings tends to more western tastes. Besides, one score is not going to affect the overall ranking in any significant way. Someone saying they don't like FFVII because they don't like RPG's is silly but there are many others who rated it lower simply just because they didn't like the game. However, if you read most of the reviews it is clear that not everyone considers it to be the god-like game some other people consider it to be. And of course you can see soccer games. I mean Pro Evolution Soccer 3 is one of the higher rated games with an average of 94.3%. You talk about how Gamespot gave some certain games scores that were too high but so did Famitsu. I mean Nintendogs and Wind Waker don't deserve perfect scores. FFXII might but I would rather wait until I played that to decide. RPG's are liked in America as well. I mean Chronno Trigger is one of the top 10 rated games of all time and if you look at any major Top 100 list it is likely you will see a lot of RPG's. Reviewer's maybe regular people but they do spend a lot more time playing games than you or I do and there is a process to how they review games to make sure it is fair. The systems are not perfect but they work in the general sense. It is your bias and close mindedness that prevents you from realising that it is possible for ANY type of game to be in the top 10, NFL or otherwise. I am not American but I find that in general, Western sites are more open minded than the Japanese ones. I personally don't like NFL games (mainly because I haven't played many) but I do recognise that any kind of game can be amazing. Also, when FFVII was released there weren't as many gaming sites as there are now so stop trying to draw suspiscious conclusions where there are none. |
| PlumbDrumb Still drinking Since 1533 Days |
2006-04-14 21:28:20 FF this, FF that... Posted by Jollipop LOL ... talk about off topic .. The OT discussion here far outwieghs the on topic stuff. Then we can boulet time the thread starter!! :D (jk, of course) |
| QuezcatoL Since 1592 Days |
2006-04-14 23:12:16 Yeah,im not gonna continue and argue i said my things,like how i would never listen to gamerankings.com,i just think its funny that the guy who gaved ff7 and ff9 6/10 and said he doesnt like rpgs and recommend FF movie instead of those games gaved FF10 9/10. |
| QuezcatoL Since 1592 Days |
2006-04-14 23:24:48 Btw the whole arguing started with that guy not accepting my comment... |
| Ajsomfan Since 1353 Days |
2006-04-14 23:56:15 Eeeeh, went into to the thread thinking that I could find a nice discussion about BIA, boy was I wrong... |
| Acert93 Mr. Bad Cop Since 1510 Days |
2006-04-15 00:18:54 In reply to Ajsomfan (2006-04-14 23:56:15) Posted by Ajsomfan Eeeeh, went into to the thread thinking that I could find a nice discussion about BIA, boy was I wrong... <valley-girl>Anyhow, like everyone knows that BiA and FF are like the same game!</valley-girl> I guess you missed the tactive WWII FPS mode in FF7! --- |
| QuezcatoL Since 1592 Days |
2006-04-15 00:56:04 http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a317/QuezcatoL/f... |
| Forums-> Main forum-> Brothers in Arms 3 Developer interview gives his opinion on 360, PS3, and Revo as well.: << 1 2 |
You have to be logged in to post in this forum!
Log in
- 6 The First 10 Minutes: Saw
- 26 Final Fantasy XIII trailer
- 13 Aliens vs Predator multiplayer trailer
- 9 Avatar: Dev Diary #4
- 3 Gameplay of Gravity Crash
- 6 Darksiders weapons trailer
- 19 Lost Planet 2 images
Top stories
About
- Copyright 2007-2009 Gamersyde SARL