About the game
- Ninety-Nine Nights
- X360
- Published by Microsoft Game S...
- Developed by Phantagram
- French release: Available
What's up?

Top stories
About
- Copyright 2007-2009 Gamersyde SARL
Log in
Express links
- Microsoft launches Xbox Wire
- CI Games unveils Lords of the Fallen (Next-gen/PC/2014)
- EA abandons the online pass
- Ubisoft indefinitely suspends production on 1666 after firing Patrice Desilets
- EA opens new DICE studio in Los Angeles
- Disney and EA announce multi-year Star Wars games agreement
- Rumor: Internal Microsoft memo says Next Xbox works without internet
- Bethesda Softworks teases a new game
- Australian classification board lists Pacific Rim game
- Why the next-generation of game design has to happen
- 2K Games won't have a booth at this year's E3
- Nintendo skips E3 conference, games & events still there
- Next Xbox will be revealed on May 21
- SCEA registers 'The Order: 1886'
- The Bureau (XCOM shooter) to be re-revealed on April 26
All comments
Page 1 2 >>It might just be the Dinasty Warriors many of us saw when the first gameplay movies surfaced
Famistu 360 would give a more accurate score i think..
I think 77% isn't that bad for this kind of game, there is no denying that this game looks nice though.
Famistu 360 would give a more accurate score i think..
Edit, it's funny reading the comments so far.
"I didn't expect this game to be considered a masterpiece though. "--LOL
" I think 77% isn't that bad for this kind of game"--LOL
" think thats a fair score,if you looked of what kind of game this is"--LOL
By this I mean that I could swear I read posts from these same people hyping it like it was almost the second coming, or third, whatever. And NOW people DO think it's just your average (because that's an average score) "hack-n'-slash. I can't say I'm 100% sure you guys were one of the ones hyping it Optimus style, but I'm almost sure, and to me, reading your comments right now, I feel the fanboy in you!
I think thats a fair score,if you looked of what kind of game this is,it might not have a epic story,and it might be very reptive and still get 8/10.
Then its gameplay must be great!!
"Famitusu 360"--as in single console magazine? As in OXM?
Famitsu (ファミ通, commonly abbreviated in Japanese kana to Fami), is a Japanese video game magazine published by Enterbrain, Inc. Currently, there are five versions of Famitsu. Weekly Famitsu, Famitsu PS2, Famitsu Xbox, Famitsu Cube and Advance, and Famitsu Wave DVD.
Still, knowing how Famitsu works, a 31/40 is disappointing.
By this I mean that I could swear I read posts from these same people hyping it like it was almost the second coming, or third, whatever. And NOW people DO think it's just your average (because that's an average score) "hack-n'-slash.
It happens to me all the time. I see a game and I think "That looks great, but I bet it gets poor reviews," or "That looks boring as hell, but I'm sure the critics will just love it."
Personally, I was surprised by Famitsu 360's 10/9/9/9 because even though I think N3 is going to be awesome, I expected it to get more average scores from the critics as we see here.
it was on topic, not offensive.
and it is well known famitsu is very biased toward sony,and as stated on onother forum topic, that they will take cash bribes to "up the score"
so what was the fucking boulet for???
the censorship on this site is worse than communist china
Easynow man, who cares, I get bouleted quite often, it's not a big deal.
@easynow
Easynow man, who cares, I get bouleted quite often, it's not a big deal.
What was the reason/s for them marking it down?
Has Myro learned Japanese yet?
I would also like to know this.
Has Myro learned Japanese yet?
So anyone else please?
the censorship on this site is worse than communist china
I tell ya, you guys crack me up..
I would also like to know this.
Has Myro learned Japanese yet?
If a Japanese person can read it to me i will tell you what it says :P
"Famitusu 360"--as in single console magazine? As in OXM?
Edit, it's funny reading the comments so far.
"I didn't expect this game to be considered a masterpiece though. "--LOL
" I think 77% isn't that bad for this kind of game"--LOL
" think thats a fair score,if you looked of what kind of game this is"--LOL
By this I mean that I could swear I read posts from these same people hyping it like it was almost the second coming, or third, whatever. And NOW people DO think it's just your average (because that's an average score) "hack-n'-slash. I can't say I'm 100% sure you guys were one of the ones hyping it Optimus style, but I'm almost sure, and to me, reading your comments right now, I feel the fanboy in you!
But i still think 77% for a hack and slash is good..
dunno if that's a once a year magazine to rate the single game that comes out every quarter or if they just fill up the other mags with previews of western games ;)
i'm still excited for this game, being, i guess one of the few, who have actually played a version of it. i never really got into the dynasty warriors games though so i dunno.
if you wanna write the game off as a hack-and-slash that's fine, but you can oversimplize every game if you want, and you'd miss some damn fine games. simple play mechanics say nothing of the amount of fun a game can have. Katamari Damacy is an excellent example of this.
the censorship on this site is worse than communist china
I was under the impression that Famitsu is harsh. If that's the case, how is 31/40 disappointing? I don't understand what you're trying to say Blim.
The editors mostly said that the game was mostly mindless killing of more or less harmless thousands of ennemies and you really never feel that you are achieving something.