All comments

Looks ok the smoke effects is pretty amazing, but it doesn,t matter how it looks ill get it when it launch because ive enjoyed playing call duty 2.

How can people say this looks bad..........when they said the in-engine teaser was gorgeous?

because i think people like to sound like there critics, and they think that other people are going oooh he knows what he is going on about

I'll wait for the real sequel by Infinity Ward, kthx.

It's Brothers in Arms 3 buddy.

Just curious, what do you expect people to discuss about if they are confronted with nothing else but one screenshot?
How great the gameplay and animations are?
I agree that you shouldn't disregard this game just by this single screenshot, but all we can discuss here at this moment is what the screenshot looks like and maybe some speculation.
If that bothers you and you just want to read about how much fun this game will be, you shouldn't bother reading the comments here.

What's so "obviously doctored" in this image?

Ya, i don't see anything "doctored". It just looks like a great screen.

ok, BIA 3 then. wuteva!If you mean the E3 trailer, then your off when you called it an "in-engine teaser." That was so obviously pre-rendered, despite what anyone says or believes. Even if the developers said that it was running on the games engine themselves, they're bullshitting. I think its what they wanted the game to look like, but they wont accomplish that. Just like Killzone 2 for PS3, just like Madden for 360, and all those other games that showed CG bullshit and said the games would look that good, and dont nearly live up to it.

I won't buy this game until I hear the reviews. I was hoping that Infinity Ward was going to make this, but no. :(

I don't really liked the presentation of the story in the Call Of Duty games; journal pages... that sucks. BIA had at least some awesome presentation.

by the way....EA sucks....i still havent forgot those crappy ass target videos for madden and live....neither one has gotten close nor do they even show signs of it.

This is totally hot , oh man , never thought it would look so good , really want to play..love part 2 so this better be as good..

Uh.... bullshit.

I can prove it's real with ease.
In fact, I've done so.... http://ccfx.net/nextboxforum/viewtopic.php?t=7911&...


In case you can't see that though, I'll just sum it up....

1. Clipping all over the place
2. No AF
3. A huge friggin seam in the middle of a wall

All of those are things that cannot happen in CG.

hey if you believe thats how the game will look then go ahead, but your gonna be disappointed. Its even clear to see that the screenshot above doesnt look nearly as good as that trailer. The texture detail is not as high, and theres none of the shadow effects from the trailer.

If you've seen the cutscenes in certain games, like Resident Evil 4, or Kameo, they look like the game but use enhanced gfx features that make it look better, like better shadowing and other types of things. I think thats what they did with the COD trailer.

That's quite possible.

But the fact of the matter is that it was NOT cgi.

oh come on it WAS cgi, them graphics are possible on this gen but not yet

as some one else said actually LOOK at the screen shot, please dont start this "killzone" argument, dont get me wrong i WANT it to to look like the demo, but the fact of the mater is it aint going to, i will be happy if it looks like cod2 because i thought that was amazing visualy.

the screen looks good to me

LOLOLOLOLOL I was actually believing Immortal_Daemon before I saw the video.
The sounds the guy makes, and the way he fires the gun.... It all gives it away man, pure CGI. However the environment looks like real time, is it possible to overlap a CGI character to a level walk through?

hehe, snopers, why do you remove the picture again if it still remains in the thread thumbnail? ;-D

about the earlier COD3 movie (CGI or not, whatever)... the only thing that matters for me is that the scene in that movie wasn't actual gameplay. no way you can control your view in such a fast manner and with that small angle of view.

btw... why should clipping not occur in a CGI-movie??

the bia3 trailer seems to be ingame, but e.g. the scene where your comrad is shot and falling into your arms is scripted... or how would that be possible at any position in the game?? did i miss something?

LOL, call of duty 2 was not repetitvie :D
that screen looked ok though

well my first thoughts of that video where that is was pre rendered. Having said that clipping is unusual in cgi. I mean im not saying clipping is impossible, since the people who rendered this cgi could have easily made a mistake. Also in that forum that Immortal Daemon linked to, a good point is made that activision did get told not to show pre rendered trailers anymore. I reckon that ingame elements like that are possible in this generation, however I believe cod3 will not look like that. There is a difference between running on the ingame engine and running on the ingame engine with all the overheads implemented. Such as game code and AI.

Come on, he was just pointing out how some people were making decisions not to buy the game after one screen shot. We just need to wait a little longer.

thank you squirrel

CGI, real-time and in-game are different. pof.
CGI = prerendered video
real-time = rendered in real time, doesn't have to be with game engine, but usually is. (this is how I understand it. I might be wrong. hasn't been known to happen)
in-game = rendered in realtime and showing true gameplay

also, can't understand why the developers try to create the most realistic water always. It's like few extra inches of male ego if u ask me. So useless. I'd like to see that power go to something useful instead. I remember ghost recon that had so heavy water that it made the xbox stutter like it was having a seizure.