All comments

I hear the ps3 version has more light sources or something. But I reckon both versions will look pretty much the same, although ati's AA is better than nvidia in thier newer cards. Its better quality and takes less of hit on fps when its cranked up. Also take into account the edram on the ati chip in the 360. So im saying they will look the same, ps3 has a few more light sources but 360 version will be less jaggy and more smooth I reckon. I think the smoke in this game and the grenade blasts look better than cod2. All the other changes dont really impress me.

looks cool...but its not got a patch on BIA3 graphically

CoD2 looked very good and i thought that CoD3 would look better..

I'm a bit dissapointed when you compare it to those E3 target-renders

It looks like COD 2,5.... not to happy about this....

Mmm, hot fudge......

Anyway, they need some more Normal maps on, well, everything. The side of that tank is a good example. Those bolts need more volume.

Also, there is too much of a contrast between the shadows and the light in that dark, rainy environment. If you look at shot 4 you can see quite sharp shadows the the back of the guy to the right, although there are no visable light sources strong enough to create such a shadow.

what rhetoric is this? 2x as powerful? not overall, maybe in 1 key criteria, but net net, they are very close.

60fps 4tw.

Can't wait to play this game =D