Advertising
| PC, PSP, PS2 Monday, October 30, 2006 | 3:41 PM

Image of Tomb Raider: Anniversary

Image of Tomb Raider: Anniversary

Eidos just released the first screennshot of Tomb Raider: Anniversary. The game will be a remake of the first Tomb Raider and will benefit from the advances of Tomb Raider Legend. Concerning the levels, it will feature the best moments of Tomb Raider 1, as well as brand new levels. Release date planned somewhere in 2007, only on PC, PS2 and PSP for the moment.


All comments

Commented on 2006-10-30 17:14:09
Should be for hardcore fans only I imagine.
Commented on 2006-10-30 17:41:07
Could be fun, it's bin years since i played the first one.
If it doesn't cost to much maybe i'll buy it.
Commented on 2006-10-30 17:57:41
I hope this makes it to 360. I enjoyed the first TR more than it's sequels.
Commented on 2006-10-30 18:50:47
Who could say no to that bum???
Commented on 2006-10-30 18:52:28
This is definitely a must buy for me. I haven't really enjoyed any of the sequels, although I've still to play the full version of TR Legends (the demo was good enough to warrant buying the game, so one of these days I'll definitely buy it).
Commented on 2006-10-30 20:50:36
This message is in "Boulet Time" (TM), If you still *really* want to see it, click here

Commented on 2006-10-30 21:28:23
Posted by spydaweb
I hope this makes it to 360. I enjoyed the first TR more than it's sequels.
*sighs in exasperation*

I hope every 360 game makes it to PS3. It's only fair, right? </sarcasm>

This game is a quick cash-in for current-gen consoles. Eidos already has a game engine up an' running (TR: Legends). The installed base for next-gen consoles is too small to justify the expense of porting the game (and PS3 owners can play the PS2 game thanks to BC). I'm well aware that Legends was a launch title for 360, but it probably didn't sell very well (compared to the current-gen platforms). And with action-adventure games like Lost Planet on the horizon, why would 360 owners settle for a PS2/PC port that doesn't take advantage of the more powerful hardware?
Commented on 2006-10-30 23:29:34
Oh yea the first TR was awesome, T Rex, mutant thingies, the midus touch, jumping ridiculously stupid distances or just drowning in a never ending under water labrynth.. ahh the memories.

I duno if i would pay full price for it though, Legends was pretty good, so unless it come to the 360 as well i doubt i'll get it.
Commented on 2006-10-30 23:47:40
Posted by Jollipop
...unless it come to the 360 as well i doubt i'll get it.
Ugh, another one...

http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3154747

"And nope, there's no Xbox 360 or PlayStation 3 version. Lara's next-generation escapades have been saved for the sequel to Tomb Raider: Legend, which apparently won't arrive until sometime in 2008."
Commented on 2006-10-31 08:32:50
Not releasing this for 360 or PS3 is a big mistake IMO. Let's say this comes out during the 2007 holiday season. It will have to compete with the biggest games from three next generation systems. This decision makes no sense to me.
Commented on 2006-10-31 11:19:55
Posted by JimmySunderland
*sighs in exasperation*

I hope every 360 game makes it to PS3. It's only fair, right? </sarcasm>

This game is a quick cash-in for current-gen consoles. Eidos already has a game engine up an' running (TR: Legends). The installed base for next-gen consoles is too small to justify the expense of porting the game (and PS3 owners can play the PS2 game thanks to BC). I'm well aware that Legends was a launch title for 360, but it probably didn't sell very well (compared to the current-gen platforms). And with action-adventure games like Lost Planet on the horizon, why would 360 owners settle for a PS2/PC port that doesn't take advantage of the more powerful hardware?
if 360 owners should not settle for such pants ports, why should ps3 owners ?

i LOVED the original Tomb Raider and i would buy it for sure, but i am not getting a ps3, so i really REALLY would like to see this come over
Commented on 2006-10-31 14:19:21
Posted by ManThatYouFear
but i am not getting a ps3, so i really REALLY would like to see this come over
You know this is coming out for PS2, not PS3. And surely you can afford a PS2? (not insulting you financial status but c'mon, PS2s are really cheap now).
Commented on 2006-10-31 16:30:15
Ahh crap i was fooled, i didn't read it correctly i thought it was coming to the PS3.

I agree that Edios are missing a big chance, especially on the PS3 as they haven't seen a next gen Lara yet.. (saying that nor has the 360 *sniggers*)
Commented on 2006-10-31 18:20:12
i need this for the XBOX 1 plazzzzzzzzzzzzzze .

the last tomb raider sale very well on all system even the xbox so way to drop this version awey?
Commented on 2006-11-01 02:07:03
I'll definately get this.
Commented on 2006-11-01 04:17:07
Posted by bama
i need this for the XBOX 1 plazzzzzzzzzzzzzze .

the last tomb raider sale very well on all system even the xbox so way to drop this version awey?
The original Xbox is no longer in production. It is a dead/defunct console.

On the other hand, Sony's still making slimline PS2's. And there's over 100 million of them in circulation compared to the ~25 million Xbox's worldwide. Eidos' decision to bring the game to PS2 is basic common sense.
Commented on 2006-11-01 20:23:09
Posted by JimmySunderland
The original Xbox is no longer in production. It is a dead/defunct console.

On the other hand, Sony's still making slimline PS2's. And there's over 100 million of them in circulation compared to the ~25 million Xbox's worldwide. Eidos' decision to bring the game to PS2 is basic common sense.
Oh yeah common sense that you wouldn release a game for 25 million people because there are 100 million others with another console .... is that what you're saying ? an installed base of 25 million is more than enough to justify releasing a game for the platform.
Commented on 2006-11-01 21:49:20
I wouldn't trust that install abse number anymore, alot of people who had original xboxes only, would have bought 360's by now, and if they haven't they probably own a PS2,so releasing it for both would be pointlessly expensive.
Commented on 2006-11-02 00:22:35
Posted by alimokrane
Oh yeah common sense that you wouldn release a game for 25 million people because there are 100 million others with another console .... is that what you're saying ? an installed base of 25 million is more than enough to justify releasing a game for the platform.
Where did I say people?! I was talking about shipped consoles... :|

As JediMasterMalik said, a lot of those Xbox owners are now 360 owners. And Eidos is planning a full-fledged sequel on next-gen consoles; it's scheduled for a 2008 release.
Commented on 2006-11-02 14:19:51
Posted by antena
You know this is coming out for PS2, not PS3. And surely you can afford a PS2? (not insulting you financial status but c'mon, PS2s are really cheap now).
sold my ps2 ages ago (after final fantasy 10 part 2) and i do not intend on buying a other

yes thought it was ps3 did not look at the piccy just saw remake of tombraider
Commented on 2006-11-08 19:24:31
looks good. I still need to get the one for 360 tho.

About the game


Advertising
What's up?
  • Doom_Bringer
    Doom_Bringer hey anyone know any good callibration sites? I need to callibrate this monitor! its all messed up (1 minute ago)
  • IRAIPT0IR
    IRAIPT0IR @Doom_Bringer: Batman AA is frikin insaneeeeeeeeee!!! (1 Hour ago)
  • Doom_Bringer
    Doom_Bringer hmm :) the batman game is sooo good! digging it so far (1 Hour ago)
  • Blue_Eagle44
    Blue_Eagle44 yeah the new steam sale is meh, only one i want is dead space but have that one 360 and completed. (2 Hours ago)
  • Megido
    Megido Can't it be both? ;) (4 Hours ago)
  • Doom_Bringer
    Doom_Bringer ahh the new steam sale sucks for me! I own Dead Space and KoToR already and don't want to buy L4D2, bring on tomorrow!!! (4 Hours ago)
  • Frozpot
    Frozpot @GriftGFX- Or it's celebration of the harvest, and a day to give thanks for all we have. If your not joking, I am sorry for you, man.. (5 Hours ago)
PreviousNext
Top stories