Advertising
| X360, PS3 Friday, January 12, 2007 | 9:09 AM

GRAW2 images

GRAW2 images

Ubisoft just sent us these new images of Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter 2, two of them being never seen before. The videos showing some gameplay will have to wait until I can get some watchable versions from an official source.
Update: Added all 4 videos, in great quality.


Gameplay #1
Gameplay #2
Gameplay #3
Gameplay #4

All comments

Page << 1 2
Commented on 2007-01-11 22:42:47
I swear if the Multiplayer is just like GRAW which all signs seem to suggest then I aint buying the game. enough crap Ubisoft, Seriously. Spend as much time on multiplayer as you do on single player for the love of god.
Commented on 2007-01-11 22:56:14
This is like GRAW 1.5... I dunno, with Lost Planet, CrackDown and GeOW already out by then, I doubt i will wanna play GRAW1.5.....
Commented on 2007-01-11 23:25:52
http://www.gamebrink.com/playstation-3/2302-Tom_Cl...

looks good enough for me :D
Commented on 2007-01-12 00:54:28
Posted by ManThatYouFear
pic 4 is nice, still think the guy in pic 2 looks about 12, skin looks to cuddly.
Umm, did you just say that you think twelve year old boys are cuddly?

Eww.
Commented on 2007-01-12 01:07:48
Just a cheap quickly assembled sequel to cash in off the great success of the first game
Commented on 2007-01-12 01:47:03
First time I thought that it is a GRAW1.5 to make a profit.
But now I'm going to make some correnction.

Check out HD footage in Gametrailers. Then you will realize that this is teh GRAW2.
Check out all the previews and you will realize that this is not a rushed game to make a profit.
Ubisoft never rush when it comes to 360. This one rocks. I'll buy it at the day one.
Commented on 2007-01-12 02:39:33
Posted by team56th
Ubisoft never rush when it comes to 360. This one rocks. I'll buy it at the day one.
Sorry but your last comment made me laugh so hard. King Kong ? Half assed multiplayer GRAW 1 ? Frame rate troubled Splinter Cell ? I am not including the Wii crap thet spit because in all fairness you only said 360.
Commented on 2007-01-12 03:28:34
Posted by alimokrane
Sorry but your last comment made me laugh so hard. King Kong ? Half assed multiplayer GRAW 1 ? Frame rate troubled Splinter Cell ? I am not including the Wii crap thet spit because in all fairness you only said 360.
Multiplayer of GRAW was good IMO, King Kong was at least good for hours-it was what Peter Jackson wanted AFAIK. And I know all the Ubisoft's Wii craps except Rayman RR.

In fact I think that FCIP was rushed but SC4 is a different story. It's not rushed; It failed.(360 version not Xbox version) Problem is that Ubisoft Shanghai is a 'cursed' developer. What they make always sucks. Ubisoft must close Shanghai studio. They must...

Ubisoft is ruining Far Cry franchise and Shanghai studio sucks. That's all. I thought that GRAW2 is rushed when I first heard of it; It wasn't. Yeah maybe they rush for money even on 360, but when it comes to 360 Tom Clancy Franchise, they never rush. They mostly success like Advanced Warfighter and Vegas or sometimes fail like Lockdown and Double Agent.

Lastly, check out that HD footage. It's GRAW2.
Commented on 2007-01-12 03:43:12
Single Player Airstrike HD Video

http://download.gametrailers.com/gt_vault/t_graw2_...
Commented on 2007-01-12 11:07:17
I have to admit, I was impressed by the 3rd video's explosions. I had GRAW but sold it to buy Oblivion and I have been wondering whether or not to rebuy it, but the next questions is, do I buy this or Rainbow 6...
Commented on 2007-01-12 11:10:01
Cadavra i have 2 kids, and yes i like to cuddle my kids. if you see somthing wrong in that, you my friend have issues.

To keep on topic though, i hate the chopper scenes it feels like tour of duty...
Commented on 2007-01-12 11:37:35
i cant even tell if they are using normal mapping. how horrible. i guess UBI didnt learn over GRAW 1. lame.
Commented on 2007-01-12 12:46:32
GRAW WOULD HAVE BEEN my fav title if the cvontrols wernt so hard to do,i wish they would simplify them a little to open the game to more people
Commented on 2007-01-12 15:57:21
Posted by DirtPipeMilkShake
i cant even tell if they are using normal mapping. how horrible. i guess UBI didnt learn over GRAW 1. lame.
I was like you too... before that gameplay movie. Also you need to consider that many Tom Clancy franchise games had a great improvement a month before the release. GRAW and SC4 had a texture improvement, and R6V had frame improvement.
Commented on 2007-01-13 12:25:10
dont get me wrong...double agent is gorgeous, but GRAW was ass. GRAW was a playable HDR tech demo; yeah the HDR was amazing, but everything else blew. how dare UBI release another GRAW without normal mapping. they should be ashamed of themselves.

i will also not be getting this game because of what that n00b said about gears sucking after ten minutes. BLASPHEMY! :)
Commented on 2007-01-13 16:23:08
Ghost recon used to be all about gigantic open envirements..but since GRAW ghost recon is a 3rd person rainbow six game!!
I Reaaaaly miss the open level design..and the big forests that made the game great! DARN YOU DESIGNERS
Commented on 2007-01-14 08:18:34
Posted by DirtPipeMilkShake
how dare UBI release another GRAW without normal mapping. they should be ashamed of themselves.
Not only that, but why do they need to downgrade graphics in MP like they did in RS:Vegas?? It looks like Ubisoft could use some more talent in that area..

And it also looks like Ubisoft is turning a bit EA on us, releasing a new version of their succesfull franshises every year, with only small updates/changes and some tweaks here and there.. Bassicly more of the same and nothing really new..
Commented on 2007-01-14 16:57:07
GRAW got a lot of attention because there was almost nothing between the 360 launch and March, besides DOA4, Full Autio, and FNR3.

Anyway, UBISoft not rushing game? Hell, they're almost as worst as EA. All big publishers have scheduled release to meet there revenue flows (good for stock market). They'll release something whenever it "passes" certification.

I still don't understand why MP has to be a different engine (downgraded). This is suppose to be next-gen! And I still don't understand why there's no story driven co-op, I'm not talking about the cheap MP co-op found in the first one, but hey if Gears can do it, there's no excuse for GRAW not to do it. Even if it takes delaying the game until the end of the year, I'd rather wait.
Commented on 2007-01-14 17:47:58
if they add cover and keep the graphics good in multiplayer as in single player its gonna be spectacular..

i wasnt looking forward to part 2 ... but after these videos HELL YAZ!!!!!
Commented on 2007-01-14 17:53:38
why are people complaining all of a sudden? i mean WTF its not 1.5 its specatular looking, the gameplay looks solid, there are definite advancements, both in the explosions and the day/nigh simulation and from what i heard some other stuff like weather.

God people dont get new games and they whine, we get a year later revision of the game with upgraded graphics, new missions, and everything scalled much larger with new weapons and units etc... what would you rather they delay the game an extra year and release well... the same thing...

stop being so frigging lame, GRAW was a wicked tactical fighter and with the improvements so far graw:2 looks to be a great step in the right direction why are people complaining and whining?

How about this!!!!! Make suggestions of what you'd like to see instead of just bashing blindly, the improve graphics, improve animations, add new drones, hopefully expand the levels even more open roaming, if they can use the SP engine as MP then it will be the perfect thing.

Yes i agreee 100% coop would be perfect, especially if they make it 4 player coop or 6 player that would be spectacular and make it for the whole entire game. GOW style.
Commented on 2007-01-16 04:21:25
oh my, it seems as if a proper first person view and a co-op campaign didn't make it - again! that's really disappointing! and they even have the nerv to call it GRAW 2 and to release it at full price...

sorry Ubi, but the times i get excited just about better looking explosions and smoke are long long ago!
Commented on 2007-01-19 15:55:26
Posted by Uli
sorry Ubi, but the times i get excited just about better looking explosions and smoke are long long ago!
I'm on my third time through Call of Duty (PC), and it surely isn't because the explosions are pretty; it's because the game kicks ass!

[edit]
I'm talking the SP campaign here.
Page << 1 2

About the game


Advertising
What's up?
  • IRAIPT0IR
    IRAIPT0IR Agreed,in this one I wanted more with each mission and all were different unlike AC that I was bored in the first hour :O (1 Hour ago)
  • SimonM7
    SimonM7 Yeah it's brilliant. I wouldn't say it's nothing like AC1, but AC1 just seems like a bizarrely long, super early demo of 2. (1 Hour ago)
  • IRAIPT0IR
    IRAIPT0IR No,the feeling not the taste XD....I played AC2 yesterday and it was awesome indeed,its hard to believe that the same team made AC1 its nothing like it. (1 Hour ago)
  • SimonM7
    SimonM7 If your first college girl tasted like coffee, then no, that wasn't her mouth. (1 Hour ago)
  • IRAIPT0IR
    IRAIPT0IR In the mouth you little dirty freaks!!!! XD (3 Hours ago)
  • IRAIPT0IR
    IRAIPT0IR Coffee.......mmmmmmmh its like when you stick your tongue in a hot college girl for the first time mmmmmmmh so fresh,so inocent...delicious!!! XD (3 Hours ago)
  • Frozpot
    Frozpot @alimokrane- I try, but I just wish a good director/writer would have as much intrest in making game movies. Where's my friggn' HALO!??... (3 Hours ago)
PreviousNext
Top stories