52 images of Ridge Racer 6

ZeroEx

Commented on 2005-10-25 14:55:41

Is it me or does the scenery look a bit empty in some parts O.o

In reply to

munkieNS

Commented on 2005-10-25 15:00:05 In reply to ZeroEx

I'm sure the game will be absolutely awesome, because it's Ridge Racer, but PGR3 definitely 1-ups the graphics here.

In reply to

school

Commented on 2005-10-25 15:10:22

This message is in "Boulet Time" (TM), If you still *really* want to see it, click here

This looks like rubbish. don,t look like next gen- rather pgr3 which is running at 100 polygons

school

Commented on 2005-10-25 15:18:30

This message is in "Boulet Time" (TM), If you still *really* want to see it, click here

Cople more weeks left to go untill the RR6 on sale with the xbox 360 and this is how it looks. not for me unless i see a big improvement. but i will be getting pgr3 on launch day. even if i don,t get the xbox 360, hopefully i get it because i pre order mines.

thies

Commented on 2005-10-25 15:35:10

I don't think I have seen any full res screenshots for any game yet which had AA enabled in an obvious way.

In reply to

McErono

Commented on 2005-10-25 15:36:03

I'm a huge RR fan so I'm getting it anyway. But it looks to clean, lifeless and sterile.

The ugliest thing are the jaggies all over... I still haven't seen any AA on any Xbox360 game and I'm starting to be really worried... it's the motion blur and HDR that everywhere is used. The ATI R500 seems to suffer from the same BS like the Nvidia cards. AA is not possible with those FX enabled.

They got embedded RAM and don't use any AA... this is more than just stupid...

In reply to

Scarbir

Commented on 2005-10-25 15:38:22

So do I. I actually saw Need for Speed Most Wanted and a couple of other EA-titels running on the Xbox 360 on not-HD tv's. It looked... well... jaggy. Far too jaggy. Except for the bloomlight, Most Wanted looked as good (or in this case: bad) as Burnout Revenge.

Fair enough; I'll be on topic. The cardesigns are better than ever :)

In reply to

McErono

Commented on 2005-10-25 15:44:56

Well there is one game that uses a heavy amount of AA (I'd say more than 2xMSAA): DoA4

In reply to

Hakkiz

Commented on 2005-10-25 16:01:11 In reply to McErono

Posted by McErono

The ugliest thing are the jaggies all over... I still haven't seen any AA on any Xbox360 game and I'm starting to be really worried... it's the motion blur and HDR that everywhere is used. The ATI R500 seems to suffer from the same BS like the Nvidia cards. AA is not possible with those FX enabled.

They got embedded RAM and don't use any AA... this is more than just stupid...

I quess there will be some AA in every game. But since Xenos isn't designed to perform well in very high resolutions with heavy AA, every game will have some jaggies, too, if you look them closely.

ATi's new PC chip is actually supposed to be more than twice as powerful as Xenos when it comes to fill-rate (high resolutions and AA). Xenos performs well in lower resolutions and geometry-heavy scenes.

In reply to

thies

Commented on 2005-10-25 16:42:40

It'S not about looking closely. The absence of AA is blatantly obvious.

In reply to

McErono

Commented on 2005-10-25 16:48:21 In reply to Hakkiz

Posted by Hakkiz

I quess there will be some AA in every game. But since Xenos isn't designed to perform well in very high resolutions with heavy AA, every game will have some jaggies, too, if you look them closely.

ATi's new PC chip is actually supposed to be more than twice as powerful as Xenos when it comes to fill-rate (high resolutions and AA). Xenos performs well in lower resolutions and geometry-heavy scenes.

Xenos it built from scratch to support 720p with AA. The 10MB embedded Ram is only for using AA without any performance hit. So the GPU of the Xbox360 should be just perfect for 1280x720 and 4AA.

Everybody should be concerned why there is no AA yet. Of course MS says that the AA will be enabled in the retail versions but we know that marketing blabla most of the time is just....

btw. inquirer has news about Halo and Halo2 enhancements on the Xbox360!

In reply to

tonto

Commented on 2005-10-25 16:49:26

hmmm, does this look worse than before ?

In reply to

Dangerous

Commented on 2005-10-25 17:09:29

Jaggies arghhhhhh

In reply to

LEBATO

Commented on 2005-10-25 17:38:01

Looks subpar.........

In reply to

Gamefan1980

Commented on 2005-10-25 18:13:38 In reply to Dangerous

The jaggies aren't that bad and do not bother me that much. I guess thats because I'm currently playing Shadow of the Colossus on PS2 =P. Anyways, I'm more disappointed that they are not using normal maps at all. Oh, well it is still a purchase.

In reply to

messinuevocrack

Commented on 2005-10-25 18:35:20

a very good dreamcast game

vale 10 palos verdes

In reply to

fragglefart

Commented on 2005-10-25 19:08:56

This makes me love PGR3 even more <3

In reply to

toelessfoot

Commented on 2005-10-25 19:39:50 In reply to Scarbir

Posted by Scarbir

So do I. I actually saw Need for Speed Most Wanted and a couple of other EA-titels running on the Xbox 360 on not-HD tv's. It looked... well... jaggy. Far too jaggy. Except for the bloomlight, Most Wanted looked as good (or in this case: bad) as Burnout Revenge.

Fair enough; I'll be on topic. The cardesigns are better than ever :)

Ummm, on a standard def TV you wouldn't see jaggies since the high resolution of the game would more than make up for it, only on HD-TVs would the jaggies be noticable. The games woulnd't scale down to 480p to be viewed on standard def tvs since that would result in smoother framerates in some cases and we'd have the same problem that plagues PC games (choosing between sharper or smoother framerates), there would simply be a loss of information when being viewed on a SD TV and in itself would act as an artificial form of AA. On an HD TV you can see the entire image and non-horizontal\vertical lines will be aliased. I dunno, I could be wrong. :)

Oh and these screenshots give me hope for this game.

In reply to

[quote=Scarbir]So do I. I actually saw Need for Speed Most Wanted and a couple of other EA-titels running on the Xbox 360 on not-HD tv's. It looked... well... jaggy. Far too jaggy. Except for the bloomlight, Most Wanted looked as good (or in this case: bad) as Burnout Revenge.

Fair enough; I'll be on topic. The cardesigns are better than ever :)[/quote]

Ummm, on a standard def TV you wouldn't see jaggies since the high resolution of the game would more than make up for it, only on HD-TVs would the jaggies be noticable. The games woulnd't scale down to 480p to be viewed on standard def tvs since that would result in smoother framerates in some cases and we'd have the same problem that plagues PC games (choosing between sharper or smoother framerates), there would simply be a loss of information when being viewed on a SD TV and in itself would act as an artificial form of AA. On an HD TV you can see the entire image and non-horizontal\vertical lines will be aliased. I dunno, I could be wrong. :)

Oh and these screenshots give me hope for this game.

bloodforge

Commented on 2005-10-25 20:30:11

Looks great, I don't see the problem with the graphics except for the aliasing. If this plays anything similar to the PSP RR, then I will definetly be picking this one up.

In reply to