This message is in "Boulet Time" (TM), If you still *really* want to see it, click here

2008-02-28 23:43:00 In reply to ManThatYouFear (2008-02-28 20:17:51)

Halo 3? It looked quite good. Really clean and crisp. It's mainly blind fanboys like you who said it looked like crap. And you're just using another stupid excuse again. Most games in development don't improve much graphically after the 1st screenshots have been released. Even small developers and XBLA developers produce better looking games than this on Xbox 360 and PS3.

I've been keeping up with that quite some time. A lot of ignorant people like you come up with that same excuse when a game looks poor. Most of the graphical development is already done in the earlier stages of the game. The graphical tweaks usually happen near the end. But that's just 'tweaks'. Some games can look a lot better with some effects added, but if they can't even make the game look better than the best looking Xbox games with the 1st few batches of screenshots, then there's no way the graphics will be amazing in any way eventually.

Here's Splinter Cell: CT on Xbox

http://images.gamersyde.com/gallery/public/869/614...