Ubi has finally released the extended trailer of Brothers in Arms: Hell's Highway in its full 720p glory. It's around one minute of extra footage, showing a panzar tank in road rage.
And, as we are from Sweden and France, UK publishers refuse to talk with us. And publishers outside UK aren't that fast in sending out media.
I've only found one swedish office that sends out media, while the rest, like 6-7, don't send out anything at all.
We really try to be up-to-date, but sometimes that's impossible. But it's important to have a complete database if visitors want to go into the game info page and download older movies, and, as Blimblim says - it's in 720p after all.
What is wrong with ppl and old or not old stuff? Be happy insted of complaining, there are lots of site that have same stuff, but for me Xboxyde is one of the best.
There's lots of ppl that havent seen this yet or other stuff, so old or not? why even bother to comment. Just Enjoy.
Commented on 2006-05-06 14:04:26 In reply to Trebby
Posted by TrebuTa
It looks average. Graphics are alright but animation suck...and this is a CGI movie, I hope the final game looks a lot better than this.
its already been said that it's gameplay footage, they're not allowed show cgi gameplay footage anymore in trailers,without stating the fact that it is cgi on the trailer
wow, this is the first time for me that i could view a 720P-trailer on my PC without stuttering! blim, did you do anything to the code of the video to make it watchable on older PCs?
Commented on 2006-05-06 14:56:43 In reply to johnjohnson
Posted by johnjohnson
WOAH does that look hot. Too bad tactical shooters >>>>>> me. :/
Yeah I'm not too crazy about tactical shoooters either. I like going rambo, not having to worry about directing my men here or firing there. I might give it a try anyway if they provide a demo. Graphics look sexy.
c'mon...you cant seriosly believe this is in-game. Its too obvious, with things like the guy catching the other soldier, the way he looks around but the weapon doesn't follow, just small things like that. And then the tank....lol. No...no no no no. Im not trying to be negative but im 100% sure its not in-game.
I dont understand why the gfx arent very good for a CGI movie (maybe because they wanted to make it look in-game?) But it still doesnt look as good as the screenshots...wierd.
Commented on 2006-05-06 15:04:37 In reply to CockKnocker
Posted by CockKnocker
c'mon...you cant seriosly believe this is in-game. Its too obvious, with things like the guy catching the other soldier, the way he looks around but the weapon doesn't follow, just small things like that. And then the tank....lol. No...no no no no. Im not trying to be negative but im 100% sure its not in-game.
I dont understand why the gfx arent very good for a CGI movie (maybe because they wanted to make it look in-game?) But it still doesnt look as good as the screenshots...wierd.
of course its in-game,its simply a scripted sequence using the game engine to generate the graphics,but it is what the game will look like
Commented on 2006-05-06 15:57:59 In reply to school
Posted by school
This is not cgi it is ingame gameplay and this is what you call next gen graphics and very good animations, looking amazing.
It may be ingame, but it's definitely NOT gameplay. It's the same deal as the COD3 vid; Cameras never move like that in games like this. These "in-game" videos are pretty much just as dishonest as fully cgi ones; at least people know for sure (or should...but there are plenty of Killzone fans out there) that the cgi vids aren't representative of what the game will look like, but with these vids, a lot of people aren't so sure and tend to believe that this is what it'll be like when the play. Also, you can tell things were definitely added in post. For example, the waypoint markers for the soldiers don't seem to hold their place on the ground very well.
Commented on 2006-05-06 17:00:53 In reply to Ronsauce
Posted by Ronsauce
It may be ingame, but it's definitely NOT gameplay. It's the same deal as the COD3 vid; Cameras never move like that in games like this. These "in-game" videos are pretty much just as dishonest as fully cgi ones; at least people know for sure (or should...but there are plenty of Killzone fans out there) that the cgi vids aren't representative of what the game will look like, but with these vids, a lot of people aren't so sure and tend to believe that this is what it'll be like when the play. Also, you can tell things were definitely added in post. For example, the waypoint markers for the soldiers don't seem to hold their place on the ground very well.
Well if its not a gameplay thats too bad for gamers because this is how i wanted next gen to look are maybe the ps3 will do better, are its too early to get quality games like this.
Commented on 2006-05-06 17:03:40 In reply to RC_Master
Posted by RC_Master
Oh god. the animation is horrible. It needs some major work. How can anyone not see that?
And if i'm going to be hearing that same guy shouting orders through the whole game it is just going to annoy me.
Maybe i'm just being harsh, but i just can't get excited about this game.
What, apart from pretty graphics (which aren't shown very well in the video imo) and nausious camera movement, does it bringing to the table?
I'll admit the game doesn't look nearly as nice as COD3, but it's still incredibly gorgeous, and as of right now, it seems to have better physics-oriented objects.
As for shouting orders....... have you never played this series before? BIA and BIA2 both feature order shouts....... so you better get use to it.
Driftwood
Download is now functional again on Gamersyde. Sorry for the past 53 days or so when it wasn't. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
Another (French) livestream today at 2:30 CEST but you're welcome to drop by and speak English. I will gladly answer in English when I get a chance to catch a breath. :) (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
GSY is getting some nice content at 3 pm CEST with our July podcast and some videos of the Deus Ex Mankind Divided preview build. :) (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
For once we'll be live at 4:30 pm CEST. Blim should not even be tired! (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
More Quantum Break coverage coming in a few hours, 9:00 a.m CEST. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
We'll have a full review up for Firewatch at 7 pm CET. Videos will only be tomorrow though. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
Tonight's livestream will be at 9:15 GMT+1, not GMT+2 as first stated. (> 3 Months ago)
Patreon
All comments (45)
Commented on 2006-05-06 12:10:20
Commented on 2006-05-06 12:16:23
Commented on 2006-05-06 12:18:05
Commented on 2006-05-06 12:26:18 In reply to Dangerous
Commented on 2006-05-06 12:35:22I've only found one swedish office that sends out media, while the rest, like 6-7, don't send out anything at all.
We really try to be up-to-date, but sometimes that's impossible. But it's important to have a complete database if visitors want to go into the game info page and download older movies, and, as Blimblim says - it's in 720p after all.
Commented on 2006-05-06 12:37:11There's lots of ppl that havent seen this yet or other stuff, so old or not? why even bother to comment. Just Enjoy.
Commented on 2006-05-06 12:47:08 In reply to BlimBlim
Commented on 2006-05-06 12:53:53your going to be very busy over the next few days
Commented on 2006-05-06 13:15:12 In reply to Dangerous
Commented on 2006-05-06 13:17:51Is this a play movie?
If it's one, I'm very exciting!
Commented on 2006-05-06 13:43:19And if i'm going to be hearing that same guy shouting orders through the whole game it is just going to annoy me.
Maybe i'm just being harsh, but i just can't get excited about this game.
What, apart from pretty graphics (which aren't shown very well in the video imo) and nausious camera movement, does it bringing to the table?
Commented on 2006-05-06 14:01:34
Commented on 2006-05-06 14:04:26 In reply to Trebby
Commented on 2006-05-06 14:19:30
Commented on 2006-05-06 14:24:00
Commented on 2006-05-06 14:54:47 In reply to Trebby
Commented on 2006-05-06 14:56:43 In reply to johnjohnson
Commented on 2006-05-06 14:59:22I dont understand why the gfx arent very good for a CGI movie (maybe because they wanted to make it look in-game?) But it still doesnt look as good as the screenshots...wierd.
Commented on 2006-05-06 15:04:37 In reply to CockKnockerI dont understand why the gfx arent very good for a CGI movie (maybe because they wanted to make it look in-game?) But it still doesnt look as good as the screenshots...wierd.
use ur brain!
Commented on 2006-05-06 15:18:46
Commented on 2006-05-06 15:57:59 In reply to school
Commented on 2006-05-06 16:47:23
Commented on 2006-05-06 17:00:53 In reply to Ronsauce
Commented on 2006-05-06 17:00:57Whether it'll stand up against COD3 (which looks better as of right now) remains to be seen though.
Commented on 2006-05-06 17:03:40 In reply to RC_MasterAnd if i'm going to be hearing that same guy shouting orders through the whole game it is just going to annoy me.
Maybe i'm just being harsh, but i just can't get excited about this game.
What, apart from pretty graphics (which aren't shown very well in the video imo) and nausious camera movement, does it bringing to the table?
As for shouting orders....... have you never played this series before? BIA and BIA2 both feature order shouts....... so you better get use to it.