As the american exclusivity is now over, we can finally offer you this trailer of Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare's multiplayer mode. If we are to believe some online outlets who have had the pleasure to try it, it's really good.
I've tried getting into CoD4. I've really tried to see why this game has been getting so much buzz but I just don't see it. I'm not even talking about this trailer, but rather all of the footage Infinity Ward has released.
Graphically it's really not that incredible. It's a pretty good looking game that runs at 60 fps just like the last Call of Duty games. And from judging from the footage captured by a lot of people at e3, the game looks like it plays not very differently from past Call of Duty games.
It really is just Call of Duty in a modern setting. It's more than likely going to be great, just like its predecessors, but not the GOTY quality FPS all of these @$$kissers on IGN, TXB, etc. are saying it is.
^^
well, i would never trust a guy with a Kameo fairy avatar
i think this games looks amazing
it looks alot differant to call of duty 2.
great graphics, great music, bucketfulls of atmosphere
how anyone can say it dosnt look good i just do not know.
Commented on 2007-08-11 20:59:33 In reply to Mech_Master
Posted by Mech_Master
Graphically it's really not that incredible.
It really is just Call of Duty in a modern setting. It's more than likely going to be great, just like its predecessors, but not the GOTY quality FPS all of these @$$kissers on IGN, TXB, etc. are saying it is.
visually Amazing, 60fps...damn...for someone who actually understand things like graphics programing and things like that, its absolutely mindblowing...then again, for people that dont know squat about that sort of thing, they might not be as impressed. but beleive me, that is amazing...as for the animations, this is multiplayer so the animations of the other players will look a bit twitchy, might even be online footage, and one can never judge the framerate or tearing from a video because you can never be shure about how much of that is the game, and how much of the is the video itself
I'm more interested in how the game plays at this point, especially multiplayer. But I guess we'll be getting an early taste of that sooner than later.
It is from the multiplayer, hence why the perks were shown at the beginning. The visuals are great, and the only complaint someone could have is that the art style isn't their cup of tea.
One thing I hope for is big open maps. I also hope the team spwans are random and moves a little of a slower pace like the original ghost recon multiplayer. Other then that, this games looks like it will have the same game mechanics as COD2, which is a shame.
Commented on 2007-08-12 08:40:19 In reply to Eddy186
Posted by Eddy186
One thing I hope for is big open maps. I also hope the team spwans are random and moves a little of a slower pace like the original ghost recon multiplayer. Other then that, this games looks like it will have the same game mechanics as COD2, which is a shame.
This game has very different mechanics than COD2. Classes, gun modification, kill streak bonuses, and additional gameplay modes being the most obvious--and even the most basic gameplay mechanics have been updated (you can SPRINT). How is that the same, or a shame?
I think it looks good...not as amazing as the press it was getting..and not to beat a dead horse, definitely not as impressive as KZ2...but it looks great, and what impressed me, is that they are cramming alot of gameplay variety in there
Commented on 2007-08-12 17:58:15 In reply to catfish
Posted by catfish
I think it looks good...not as amazing as the press it was getting..and not to beat a dead horse, definitely not as impressive as KZ2...but it looks great, and what impressed me, is that they are cramming alot of gameplay variety in there
Are you referring to this video or the single player videos?
Commented on 2007-08-13 00:36:32 In reply to GriftGFX
Posted by GriftGFX
This game has very different mechanics than COD2. Classes, gun modification, kill streak bonuses, and additional gameplay modes being the most obvious--and even the most basic gameplay mechanics have been updated (you can SPRINT). How is that the same, or a shame?
I said game mechanics.
It's leaning too much on the arcade style of things and the run animations, the gun movements, the speed, jumps, weapon aiming, the dying animations it all seems too familiar from COD2.
It's a shame becuse I would have loved a game leaning more on realism. Damn am I iching for an old Rainbow Six game, the ones on the pc before it turned into an arcade style game.
Those are game mechanics--and if you're just talking about movement--that's different too. Of course it still feels like a Call of Duty game though, and if you were expecting that to change.. well I'm glad you're disappointed, because some of us like Call of Duty :)
The one thing I haven't seen confirmation of is leaning, which you can't do in the console COD games.. I hope for simplicities sake they didn't take it out of the PC version of the game as well. That would sorta suck.
I must be looking at different videos though, and reading different information, because the gameplay mechanics (from movement, to gun play) are vastly different from COD2. Seriously--how can the gun play be the same when we're moving from Lee Enfield's to M16's and G3's? They're vastly different weapons--and that's not even considering attachments like the M203.
COD2 had a severe lack of death animations BTW--even if they just ADD several more, it would still be a vast improvement.
Driftwood
Download is now functional again on Gamersyde. Sorry for the past 53 days or so when it wasn't. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
Another (French) livestream today at 2:30 CEST but you're welcome to drop by and speak English. I will gladly answer in English when I get a chance to catch a breath. :) (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
GSY is getting some nice content at 3 pm CEST with our July podcast and some videos of the Deus Ex Mankind Divided preview build. :) (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
For once we'll be live at 4:30 pm CEST. Blim should not even be tired! (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
More Quantum Break coverage coming in a few hours, 9:00 a.m CEST. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
We'll have a full review up for Firewatch at 7 pm CET. Videos will only be tomorrow though. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
Tonight's livestream will be at 9:15 GMT+1, not GMT+2 as first stated. (> 3 Months ago)
Patreon
All comments (24)
Commented on 2007-08-11 19:08:12Graphically it's really not that incredible. It's a pretty good looking game that runs at 60 fps just like the last Call of Duty games. And from judging from the footage captured by a lot of people at e3, the game looks like it plays not very differently from past Call of Duty games.
It really is just Call of Duty in a modern setting. It's more than likely going to be great, just like its predecessors, but not the GOTY quality FPS all of these @$$kissers on IGN, TXB, etc. are saying it is.
Commented on 2007-08-11 19:16:45well, i would never trust a guy with a Kameo fairy avatar
i think this games looks amazing
it looks alot differant to call of duty 2.
great graphics, great music, bucketfulls of atmosphere
how anyone can say it dosnt look good i just do not know.
Commented on 2007-08-11 19:19:20is this game mixture of espionage and run and gun shooting?????
Commented on 2007-08-11 20:17:34
Commented on 2007-08-11 20:59:33 In reply to Mech_MasterIt really is just Call of Duty in a modern setting. It's more than likely going to be great, just like its predecessors, but not the GOTY quality FPS all of these @$$kissers on IGN, TXB, etc. are saying it is.
Commented on 2007-08-11 22:04:19
Commented on 2007-08-11 22:42:18
Commented on 2007-08-11 22:46:03
Commented on 2007-08-11 22:48:10But it was about damn time to move on from a WW2 shooter to something "new".... in my book this isnt CoD 4, its CoD 2.
Commented on 2007-08-11 22:48:56 In reply to ompalompaBut it was about damn time to move on from a WW2 shooter to something "new".... in my book this isnt CoD 4, its CoD 2.
Commented on 2007-08-11 23:18:27
Commented on 2007-08-12 00:54:06
Commented on 2007-08-12 01:09:06 In reply to GriftGFX
Commented on 2007-08-12 06:12:44
Commented on 2007-08-12 07:38:57
Commented on 2007-08-12 08:40:19 In reply to Eddy186
Commented on 2007-08-12 13:50:10Graphically it's really not that incredible.
LMAO! yeah right ho!
Commented on 2007-08-12 13:58:21
Commented on 2007-08-12 17:50:11
Commented on 2007-08-12 17:58:15 In reply to catfish
Commented on 2007-08-13 00:36:32 In reply to GriftGFXIt's leaning too much on the arcade style of things and the run animations, the gun movements, the speed, jumps, weapon aiming, the dying animations it all seems too familiar from COD2.
It's a shame becuse I would have loved a game leaning more on realism. Damn am I iching for an old Rainbow Six game, the ones on the pc before it turned into an arcade style game.
Commented on 2007-08-13 01:47:20The one thing I haven't seen confirmation of is leaning, which you can't do in the console COD games.. I hope for simplicities sake they didn't take it out of the PC version of the game as well. That would sorta suck.
I must be looking at different videos though, and reading different information, because the gameplay mechanics (from movement, to gun play) are vastly different from COD2. Seriously--how can the gun play be the same when we're moving from Lee Enfield's to M16's and G3's? They're vastly different weapons--and that's not even considering attachments like the M203.
COD2 had a severe lack of death animations BTW--even if they just ADD several more, it would still be a vast improvement.
Commented on 2007-09-08 21:38:18
Commented on 2007-09-09 08:39:29