About 14 years ago, I was 14 years younger and I remember being blown away by Duke Nukem Forever's E3 trailer. Little did I know I would talk about the game's final release on a website dedicated to video games in 2011. As you will see, Duke shows his age, both graphically and when it comes to level design. Still, the game is a good laugh, but you have to accept a huge leap in time, which very few people will be ready to in my humble opinion. The console version suffers from many slowdowns and awfully long loading times, but things are smoother and faster on PC. The videos are from the PC version in 1080p and 30 fps but the game obviously runs at 60 fps. Update: Two gameplay videos added. Update 2: Last video added, so you can see Duke's legendary finesse.
Also, the art direction in Dying Light is not exactly visually pleasing. It's really drab yellow and brown imo. Dead Island 2 looks far more enticing, cartoonish saturation. (2 Hours ago)
Nah i don't understand the praise. :) (3 Hours ago)
Take a look at FC4 for example, that game looks clean, little aliasing, not nearly as rough looking as DL. (4 Hours ago)
@droezelke: Xbox One man. But i take back what i said..i really don't find it looking all that good. I saw the PS4 video where the player is outside for the first time...it looks messy imo. (4 Hours ago)
It sounds like Valve is jumping into the VR hardware game after all. (7 Hours ago)
@Moonwalker: PS4, Xbox1 or PC. I think dying light looks great on PS4. (7 Hours ago)
Since the ultimate sale ive been going haam on m:cc and it packs a punch with content (12 Hours ago)