About 14 years ago, I was 14 years younger and I remember being blown away by Duke Nukem Forever's E3 trailer. Little did I know I would talk about the game's final release on a website dedicated to video games in 2011. As you will see, Duke shows his age, both graphically and when it comes to level design. Still, the game is a good laugh, but you have to accept a huge leap in time, which very few people will be ready to in my humble opinion. The console version suffers from many slowdowns and awfully long loading times, but things are smoother and faster on PC. The videos are from the PC version in 1080p and 30 fps but the game obviously runs at 60 fps. Update: Two gameplay videos added. Update 2: Last video added, so you can see Duke's legendary finesse.
I really expected CDProject to deliver on the graphics as they really did so with Witcher 2. Oh well, it still looks like it'll be way above average grejfix. (5 Hours ago)
@GriftGFX: Maybe, but hopefully Witcher 3 will at least not be rushed and broken on release. At least i hope so. The graphics still look good, even if the visual downgrade is disappointing. (5 Hours ago)
@Moonwalker: I thought the ocean in particular looked really bad. Remember that initial reveal video w/ crazy waves and awesome water effects? Gone. (6 Hours ago)
Either way..i am not concerned about colours, its something you can change yourself. But i am a little about some parts in the PC video, some things looking really nice and others rather...mediocre. (7 Hours ago)
@droezelke: CDPR said it was running on Xbox One during MS' press conference. :) (7 Hours ago)