About the game
- Halo 3 ODST
- X360
- Published by Microsoft Game S...
- Developed by Bungie
- French release: 4th quarter 2009
Top stories
About
- Copyright 2007-2009 Gamersyde SARL
Log in
Express links
- Royal Navy to use PSPs for engineering training
- Yoko Ono infects The Beatles: Rock Band
- Church attacks Resident Evil, Capcom fights back
- Word of mouth is more important to consumers than reviews
- Square Enix providing Deus Ex 3 cinematics
- Contra on NES remade in Half-Life 2
- Dead Space 2?
- Crysis is back to the future
- Bioshock cosplay in real condition
- 10 minutes of Bad Company 2 beta
- Happy 4th birthday, Xbox 360
- Uwe Boll: Bloodrayne 3: shooting in january...
- Revelation of Infinty ward about the Airport level from Modern Warfare 2
- Mysterious new 2K games
- Police: yes kid, parents can take your Xbox
Popular games

All comments
Page 1 2 3 >>Kinda epic style - that's what I expect from a Halo game :D
Hope they use a new engine on Reach though :)
Hope they use a new engine on Reach though :)
Okay, since no one else is going to do it, I'll be the first to put it out there. After 3 Halo games before this and almost ten years of the Halo franchise, is this all that Bungie can give us? It's the same f--king game. I am not whining about it, and I know there are some of you guys that don't like my comments sometimes, but I don't bash games just for the sake of bashing them, I bash games that deserve to be bashed. I was a die-hard Halo player; almost to the point that no other fps was good enough for me. Dare I say that I didn't even purchase my own copy of Call of Duty4. I liked it and played it, but I never bought it. Now after watching that video in hd it just proved my point even more that when a developer becomes reknowned for a particular title, they eventually slack off from delivering a descent sequal. Bungie are definitely guilty. Halo3 was just the unfinished game of Halo2. Anyone who completed Halo2 on the Xbox would know that it was cut short and that the devs obviously had to rush the game to store shelves to meet deadline. So in turn we got Halo3, which was almost technically identical to it's last gen little brother. You don't have to have 20/20 vision to see that. Now they decide to give us this ODST game that looks like a launch title. WTF? Did you see the animations? The enemies didn't even look like they were in battle. My gosh, upgrade the engine why don't you. The brown and 5:00p.m lighting is so out of touch. If this game has a 59.99 price, they are robbing their fanbase. It's just wrong. I only made it through 2/3 of the video before my eyes glazed. If this game doesn't sale well, it will be their own fault. Maybe it will make them step up like the other developers who are doing it better. If some of you don't like my comments (and you know who you are), piss off.
And also this isn't the same linear corridor shooter Halo 2 and Halo 3 were. It's structured similar to the way the new PoP was. You have a massive overworld to explore and then more linear missions scattered about for you to complete in any order you see fit. Just in terms of gameplay mechanics, yes this is pretty much identical to Halo 2 and 3, but there are some new tweaks to the formula and the game is structured completely differently than any prior Halo game.
To me it looks like the cutscenes are CG. And the level of the cutscene graphical quality should have been the level Halo 3 should have had from the start.
Now that there are rumours that Gearbox might make a PC-Halo, I wonder what they are able to do with the graphics (if the rumours are true; Pitchford didn't deny it, so it might be true).
It's the same f--king game.
looks pretty dated, but at least the narative looks to be half decent this time around.
I'm quite surprised at the bashing this is taking, because I personally think it looks pretty good - and that's coming from someone who can't say he loved Halo 3. The visuals look fine to me; face models are vastly improved, the environments look decent enough and there appears to be a much better narrative. Just because it isn't anything mindblowing doesn't necessarily mean it looks bad.
Sure, when you compare it to other FPS games coming out - Call of Duty springs to mind - it doesn't really compete but, then again, this isn't meant to be a sequel is it?
I won't be buying it anyway, and I can imagine many others are in the same boat. This will still sell well, what with it being Halo, but it's not going to enhance Bungie's reputation much (if at all).
Eh, at least it looks better than Halo 3. I mean, it should anyway, but still.
I'm quite surprised at the bashing this is taking, because I personally think it looks pretty good - and that's coming from someone who can't say he loved Halo 3. The visuals look fine to me; face models are vastly improved, the environments look decent enough and there appears to be a much better narrative. Just because it isn't anything mindblowing doesn't necessarily mean it looks bad.
Sure, when you compare it to other FPS games coming out - Call of Duty springs to mind - it doesn't really compete but, then again, this isn't meant to be a sequel is it?
I won't be buying it anyway, and I can imagine many others are in the same boat. This will still sell well, what with it being Halo, but it's not going to enhance Bungie's reputation much (if at all).
as for sales, i honestly dont think this is going to be a huge runaway success like previous titles for a few reasons, firstly, the aformentioned backlash against the game from even die hard fans, and the fact it's an expansion. it will sell well obviously, but i dont think it's going to even approach the numbers seen for halo 3.
Shit, they actually used Nathan Fillion's face!
Goddamn FireFly is so awesome :(
Awesome vid!
Kinda epic style - that's what I expect from a Halo game :D