PS3 Wednesday, August 22, 2007 | 10:49 AM

GC07: HAZE Images

GC07: HAZE Images

Haze also gets a few new images for the Game Convention.


All comments

Page 1 2 >>
Commented on 2007-08-22 10:58:57
Really looking forward to picking this up this year.
Commented on 2007-08-22 10:59:14
Looks nicely polished, 2/4x AA? Love the last shot with the empty shell popping out the shotty.
Commented on 2007-08-22 11:00:41
Game's art is pretty bad.
Commented on 2007-08-22 11:07:23
This message is in "Boulet Time" (TM), If you still *really* want to see it, click here

Commented on 2007-08-22 11:13:07
This game looks soooooo damn bad ass!

This and Killzone 2 of course, but knowing this is coming for Ps3 this fall, I am picking it up for sure!

The old screenshots was obviously bad compressed, but when they are officially released by the company who makes them, then it really shows how it will look like, and it looks amazing.

I love the fact you can choose sides between high-tech soldier or a "merc".

Gonna be intense online :D
Commented on 2007-08-22 11:15:48 In reply to Sath
Posted by Sath
This game looks soooooo damn bad ass!

This and Killzone 2 of course, but knowing this is coming for Ps3 this fall, I am picking it up for sure!

The old screenshots was obviously bad compressed, but when they are officially released by the company who makes them, then it really shows how it will look like, and it looks amazing.

I love the fact you can choose sides between high-tech soldier or a "merc".

Gonna be intense online :D
I agree. Playing as a specific side, you have to watch out for the other side's special abilities (such as a Merc taking your gun). Adds some depth to the multiplayer and really steps it up.
Commented on 2007-08-22 11:29:37
Number 11 is a fakey one
Commented on 2007-08-22 11:30:21 In reply to Zaku
Posted by Zaku
I agree. Playing as a specific side, you have to watch out for the other side's special abilities (such as a Merc taking your gun). Adds some depth to the multiplayer and really steps it up.
Well the "merc" is the Revels I like to call. For instance if you are Mantel and I am a MErc, you gotta be careful I don't make you go crazy by shooting your Nectar on your back, if not you will go crazy so I can just come up and take your gun away from you and kill you.

I do love the Mantels assault rifle though, much better than the Rebels..

But yeah, you gotta be careful everytime you choose sides, gotta be aware of what the other teams abilities is, so you don't die quickly.

But I think Mantel got a bit more adtantage with the Nectar, they get like foresight, choke grab, slow mo bullets...etc.

While Rebels only has play dead, knife attack :D, and hit-and-grab weapon.

It would be bad ass if the Rebels could camo themselves with the environment for some ammont of time. But ahh well, online is gonna get intense :D
Commented on 2007-08-22 11:31:01 In reply to prodygee
Posted by prodygee
Number 11 is a fakey one
It's in-game man.
Commented on 2007-08-22 12:04:45
I did not knew that an negative opinion gets bullet timed....what kind of censorship is going on here?
Commented on 2007-08-22 12:12:47 In reply to BobaZloba
Posted by BobaZloba
I did not knew that an negative opinion gets bullet timed....what kind of censorship is going on here?
Welcome to Gamersyde...we welcome all people :P
Commented on 2007-08-22 12:15:54 In reply to BobaZloba
Well you can say negative things about games but if it is done by one sentence expect boulet times then.
Commented on 2007-08-22 12:37:46 In reply to Isomac
Posted by Isomac
Well you can say negative things about games but if it is done by one sentence expect boulet times then.
^^^^
What he said.
Commented on 2007-08-22 12:48:44
If you're gonna be critical of a game make sure it's constructive criticism, if it's a one-liner expected to have your comment placed under a bullet time.
Simple really...
Commented on 2007-08-22 13:07:07
....nice! Looks very clean.
Commented on 2007-08-22 13:09:41
Personally i dont think this game will achieve what it sets out to do , I dont know why i just feel compared to the wealth of future fps games were going to embrace in the comming months that this one ... just wont stand up against them. Then again i could be pleasently proved wrong :)
Commented on 2007-08-22 13:30:21
OK, let's try this:

I am very picky and I think that this game does not LOOK innovative. The game just looks too generic in my eyes. Jungle, hangars, construction sites etc. I'm sorry, these environments are without ideas.

Gameplaywise I can't judge. Good polished gameplay featuring 4 player coop might save the game though.
Commented on 2007-08-22 13:45:49
Looks really nice, the physical combat looks ace in this game, and really is quite an innovative feature.
Commented on 2007-08-22 14:07:52
i'll wait for the 360 one
Commented on 2007-08-22 14:26:44 In reply to BobaZloba
Posted by BobaZloba
OK, let's try this:

I am very picky and I think that this game does not LOOK innovative. The game just looks too generic in my eyes. Jungle, hangars, construction sites etc. I'm sorry, these environments are without ideas.

Gameplaywise I can't judge. Good polished gameplay featuring 4 player coop might save the game though.
Well what do you expect...going into buildings with terroist, then it would become Rainbow. Or did you think of going to some cave and find monsters to fight againt, then it would be too generic (which is a word is being used TOO MUCH these days by gamers).

I rather have them set in jungles, construction sites, big buildings, desert...etc. but with great gameplay.

And the gameplay looks to be awesome, and I have seen almost all the gameplay footages both low and HD and it looks awesome.

There is gonna be a demo out for a pre-release so I can't wait for it...and obviously its only for PS3 this year, meaning no demo for 360 until they announce the game next year which is most likely they will.
Commented on 2007-08-22 17:11:35
vehicle combat FTW!
Commented on 2007-08-22 18:22:31
Some of those look pre-rendered, like the screenshots for GRAW 2 when they came out. Remember?

But I love the main rifle design, very aesthetically pleasing and memorable. Could be even more memorable than the Assault Rifle of Halo 1 !
Commented on 2007-08-22 19:27:16
Digi the screenshots are 100% in-game, you can clearly see jaggies and such in some corners, pre-rendered images would not look this.

And I like these assault rifles more than any of the Halo rifles.
Commented on 2007-08-22 19:37:20 In reply to Sath
Posted by Sath
Digi the screenshots are 100% in-game, you can clearly see jaggies and such in some corners, pre-rendered images would not look this.
I don't know.. they look a little too crisp to me as well. I'll meet you somewhere in the middle. 55% real time ;) Just because they're "in game" doesn't mean they're not cleaned up.
Commented on 2007-08-22 19:54:57 In reply to Myro
Posted by BobaZloba
I did not knew that an negative opinion gets bullet timed....what kind of censorship is going on here?
Yeah, eventually you learn to live with it...
Posted by Myro
vehicle combat FTW!
and what about also void comments like this?
Posted by IIGrayFoxII
....nice! Looks very clean.
what about one line positive comments?!

be coherent mods...
Page 1 2 >>

About the game


What's up?
  • GriftGFX
    GriftGFX Destiny 2 comes out in September and they haven't even announced it. (1 minute ago)
  • Moonwalker
    Moonwalker @Sdarts: Really looking forward to RDR2 but it's odd that we're like 7 months after the debut trailer and nothing else. Really wonder if they actually launch it this year too. (11 minutes ago)
  • GriftGFX
    GriftGFX Activision doesn't "own" Blizzard Entertainment. Activision Blizzard owns Blizzard Entertainment. They didn't buy Blizzard. That was a merger. (44 minutes ago)
  • GriftGFX
    GriftGFX There's a lot of internal politics at play at ActivisionBlizzard. I doubt killing the battle.net brand was a unanimous decision. (46 minutes ago)
  • GriftGFX
    GriftGFX It's not like the sell it anymore anyway. "Very generous" seems a bit overstated. And what we know of their "free reign" is probably less than informed than you think. (46 minutes ago)
  • Sdarts
    Sdarts Blizzard giving the original StarCraft for free is very generous of them. Weird to think Activision owns it, even though Blizzard has free reign. One of the best onwed by one of the worst. (4 Hours ago)
  • Sdarts
    Sdarts StarCraft Remastered's additions - more in the article - and the fact that Blizzard will make the original StarCraft free, and let players of the original play with those of the remastered is great. (4 Hours ago)
PreviousNext
  • Driftwood
    Driftwood GSY is getting some nice content at 3 pm CEST with our July podcast and some videos of the Deus Ex Mankind Divided preview build. :) (> 3 Months ago)
  • Driftwood
    Driftwood For once we'll be live at 4:30 pm CEST. Blim should not even be tired! (> 3 Months ago)
  • Driftwood
    Driftwood More Quantum Break coverage coming in a few hours, 9:00 a.m CEST. (> 3 Months ago)
  • Driftwood
    Driftwood We'll have a full review up for Firewatch at 7 pm CET. Videos will only be tomorrow though. (> 3 Months ago)
  • Driftwood
    Driftwood Tonight's livestream will be at 9:15 GMT+1, not GMT+2 as first stated. (> 3 Months ago)
  • Driftwood
    Driftwood New GSY Live dedicated this time to Just Cause 3 on Tuesday 9:30 GMT+2 (> 3 Months ago)
  • Driftwood
    Driftwood Join us tomorrow at 10 pm GMT+2 for a new livestream. We'll be playing Rise of the Tomb Raider. (> 3 Months ago)
PreviousNext
Top stories