Advertising
| X360, PS3, PC Wednesday, June 11, 2008 | 5:18 PM

Images of PS3 Bioshock

Images of PS3 Bioshock

Here are three more images from the Bioshock port on the Playstation 3. Its release date is set to the month of September 2008, as can be read on Sony's official blog, Three Speech.


All comments

Page 1 2 >>
Commented on 2008-06-11 18:29:58
Weren't these the exact same images from the previous update?
Commented on 2008-06-11 18:44:48
Ahhhhs!! it's the commonly spotted jaggy monster!!!
Commented on 2008-06-11 18:46:54
Hm... the PS3 really seems to struggle with UE3. But as long as it'll run smoothly the PS3 fans can look forward one of the best games ever^^
Commented on 2008-06-11 18:50:14
Mind you, BioShock runs on a modified UE 2.5 engine.
Commented on 2008-06-11 19:07:56
Holy downgrade much?
Commented on 2008-06-11 19:20:40
Posted by chisholm
Mind you, BioShock runs on a modified UE 2.5 engine.
Nope, it moved to UE3 towards the end of development I believe.

EDIT - Yeah there is a Case Study on the Unreal Tech site.
Commented on 2008-06-11 19:21:45
Where is a good Bump Mapping?
Commented on 2008-06-11 19:37:50
OMG where is Bump mapping ?!?!?
Oh...my...god....
i don't want to be banned for the 409830458 time....but....WTF !!
Commented on 2008-06-11 19:39:35
Posted by Sly_Marbo135
Where is a good Bump Mapping?
looks like they stripped a good portion of it to me, wtf and jaggies around girl in the first and bd in the last one.. lord they really need to take more time on this as its not looking good... i mean on the 360 it was a showcase of how good and atmospheric a game can be... on the ps3 their rushing for some reason.
Commented on 2008-06-11 19:42:09
The same graphics as on PC(dx9) and X360. As i expected. :(
Commented on 2008-06-11 19:42:20
Gosh, the 360 and PC looked way above and beyond this. O.o
Commented on 2008-06-11 19:43:56
Big Daddy = Big Jaggy.
Commented on 2008-06-11 19:44:01
Posted by Fleshstalker
Gosh, the 360 and PC looked way above and beyond this. O.o
You sure? I played Bioshock on PC and can't see any difference
Commented on 2008-06-11 19:56:56
Bioshock runs on UE2.5 with the UE3 renderer. These screens look about the same as 360 version and PC. Smoke is better on 360. UE3-games all suffer from jaggies cause the engine can only do software antialiasing.
Commented on 2008-06-11 19:59:37
Posted by Slabs
Nope, it moved to UE3 towards the end of development I believe.

EDIT - Yeah there is a Case Study on the Unreal Tech site.
That seems to be the case. I stand corrected.
Commented on 2008-06-11 20:09:17
The textures in that third screen are just... wow.
Commented on 2008-06-11 20:31:37
The 360 version looked better at least.
Commented on 2008-06-11 20:35:13
nice shadow in the third screenshot. overall looks a bit to light?
Commented on 2008-06-11 20:35:59
Posted by blmbox
Big Daddy = Big Jaggy.
The 360 version had no AA either you know, have you all ever seen pictures of bioshock one? Its not that pretty as a still image.
Commented on 2008-06-11 20:49:13
Here's a screenshot from the 360 version:

http://xbox360media.ign.com/xbox360/image/article/...

See anything familiar? Starts with a j.

Here's another one so you know it's not just a one-in-a-million.

http://xbox360media.ign.com/xbox360/image/article/...
Commented on 2008-06-11 21:19:59
Posted by Sly_Marbo135
Where is a good Bump Mapping?
Dude i agree, but bump mapping is sooooooo 2001!
Normal Mapping is soo 2007!
Now we should expect Parralax Occlusion Mapping (as in the crysis pebblestones you know) :)
Commented on 2008-06-11 21:21:24
Posted by MvmntInGrn
The 360 version had no AA either you know, have you all ever seen pictures of bioshock one? Its not that pretty as a still image.
Did he ever say anything about it not being jaggy on the 360? No.
This game will suck and be a 1-day play-then-collect-dust game just as much as it was on the 360 :P
Commented on 2008-06-11 21:40:52
Fanboys always jump to fast conclusions. The fact is that these screens look horrid. But let's see how it turns out in the end. Xbox screens weren't beautifull, too, but the game was a looker when running.
Commented on 2008-06-11 21:53:04
i thought the graphics were supposed to be enhanced for the ps3 version? If the 3rd screen shot is anything to go by then they've been downgraded. The textures, lighting, and colour all seem to look inferior to the 360 version.. unless thats just a very bad quality picture.
Commented on 2008-06-11 22:05:33
Posted by Contra
Weren't these the exact same images from the previous update?
Nope ...
Page 1 2 >>

About the game


Advertising
What's up?
  • upsnake
    upsnake any one played machinarium here? (11 minutes ago)
  • docLEXfisti
    docLEXfisti Modern Warfare was the last CoD I bought, waste of money for me. All scripted, makes you appreciate Halo even more (Infinit Ward: THAT is some good example of AI) (1 Hour ago)
  • GeRaLTo
    GeRaLTo borderlands dlc 2day xD (2 Hours ago)
  • Doom_Bringer
    Doom_Bringer oh yea that, Dragon Age was preloading at the time (10 Hours ago)
  • GriftGFX
    GriftGFX Maybe.. it's different for pre-loaded stuff too. (10 Hours ago)
  • Doom_Bringer
    Doom_Bringer @GriftGFX: well Dragon age extracted is suppose to be arround 20 gigs but the download was only 8 gigs or 15 gigs...procedure might be different for newer games (11 Hours ago)
  • GriftGFX
    GriftGFX 45 minutes for this game would have to be like... 3+ megabytes per second. My Comcast can't do that. (11 Hours ago)
PreviousNext
Top stories