Grand Theft Auto : San Andreas has just been released on Xbox 360 and the port is quite awful in every possible respect. There is a bug causing the sound of the cutscenes to frequently disappear, giving you the impression that someone stepped on the remote and muted the TV. The frame rate is horribly choppy which is unacceptable considering it's a PS2/Xbox title running on a hardware that can actually have GTA IV run better (yes, it's that bad at times in San Andreas). Then, there is everything controls related, that may have been ok back in 2004 but it now feels so dated it does not really make you want to keep playing. With GTA V to come on PS4 and Xbox One, why would you even consider going back to 2004 Los Santos anyway? Note: Videos were captured at 1080p but the game's native resolution is obviously 720p.
FFA deathmatch is pretty fun in OW even though it's totally not balanced. Great Tracer practice. (52 minutes ago)
The Orville episode 3 was amazing. Very heavy topic but handled it extremely well. (1 Hour ago)
I wasn't really setting up any specific comparison at all. I said modern phones and many PCs. That's pretty vague. You can set whatever limits on that you want. (2 Hours ago)
Granted.. synthetic benchmarks are just that.. but in Geekbench 4 a Snapdragon 835 can outperform a Q9550.. which is definitely faster than the E6600. (2 Hours ago)
My personal history of personal computing goes back to 8-bit computers. I think 2017 ARM CPUs are amazing. (2 Hours ago)
@droezelke: I said E6600.. and its single core performance in synthetic benchmarks is certainly comparable. But yes. You can go back to the 80s. I didn't say anything about them being modern. (2 Hours ago)
@GriftGFX: no, a snapdragon 835 does not have computing power of a Q6600 (9 years old). Do you really want to go further in time to prove your statement made sense? (2 Hours ago)