X360 Friday, February 10, 2006 | 1:05 PM

Rumble Roses XX scans

Rumble Roses XX scans

This is a habit now, this week Famitsu Weekly had two full pages about Rumble Roses XX, with new images and artworks of this very classy game.
Update : Better quality images.


All comments

Commented on 2006-02-10 13:18:44
i love girls but i won,t buy this game.
Commented on 2006-02-10 13:33:53
Looks beautiful..

This is the game most people will buy but be ashamed to speak of it's ownage. I can just see people defending the game.."no..no i bought it because the gameplay rocks! the intense fights, physics, arena design etc.."

Why do they have to make this game seem like a playboy magazine.. -_-'
Commented on 2006-02-10 13:34:45 In reply to school
Posted by school
i love girls but i won,t buy this game.
If you're not into wrestling then yeah, there's no point. Which is why the first RR I never gotten into, but being that this game looks to be much better than the first in gameplay and graphics it's certainly gotten me interested, with the bonus that it's free from greasy sweaty men.
Commented on 2006-02-10 15:24:51
How much imagination do they use with on the second page a Lei Fang and Ayane look-a-like...
Still doesn't look as good as DOA4 (and that one is not even making full use of the 360 hardware).
Commented on 2006-02-10 15:47:26
The thing with this game is still shots look better than video's (at least of what video's i have watched), the animation is really bad!

But pretty much all wresling games have clunky controls and moves.
Commented on 2006-02-10 15:47:42 In reply to willdabeast
Posted by willdabeast
If you're not into wrestling then yeah, there's no point. Which is why the first RR I never gotten into, but being that this game looks to be much better than the first in gameplay and graphics it's certainly gotten me interested, with the bonus that it's free from greasy sweaty men.
I'm not into wrestling and I'm thinkin about getting this game. The game has some uh..charm; I just can't tell if it's going to look awsome in motion or terrible..the girl's look awsome in some scans and then the game looks sorta terrible in other pics/vids thus far..so I don't know what to think about this one at all.
Commented on 2006-02-10 16:04:16
xDDDD Look Look in the second Scan!!!

Ayane and Lei Fang from DOA xDDDD
Commented on 2006-02-10 16:45:11 In reply to willdabeast
Posted by willdabeast
If you're not into wrestling then yeah, there's no point. Which is why the first RR I never gotten into, but being that this game looks to be much better than the first in gameplay and graphics it's certainly gotten me interested, with the bonus that it's free from greasy sweaty men.
I thought the same thing with the first game on the PS2. I picked it for cheap and I was actually surprised how good the game was, and I am NOT a wrestling fan at all. I may check this one out.
Commented on 2006-02-10 16:59:12
well Ima be honest I want this game cause of customize a girl feature and thats it!
Commented on 2006-02-10 19:04:21
The people who offer negative opinions and views about RRXX and who openly state that DOA4 "looks better", is "animated better" etc. haven't got a leg to stand on. I was in contact with Konami's PR department early last year with suggestions about this game, which I asked them to forward to Yukes - so you see, I take this game and its content rather seriously.
Anyway, I guarantee you that when RRXX is released it will blow DOA4 and ANY other wrestling game right out of the water. It will have more features. The characters will be multi-dimensional in terms of game play ( altered looks will significantly alter strength/stamina/agility, etc.). The animation will be life-like and superb, not cartoon-ish with poorly proportioned toy-like characters involved in ultra-quick, non-human movements. The background scenery will put DOA4's and the rest of the childish junk out there to shame, and a lot more.
As for those wimpering, whipped, well-programmed souls who are scared to play this game because of being ostracized by those in society with a demented Feminist mindset, well, YOUR LOSS!
RRXX will end up set ting the standard for wrestling games for years to come - and will move the bar much higher for delivering a superb finished product.
Commented on 2006-02-10 20:33:20
This game only has girls right?
Commented on 2006-02-10 20:58:45 In reply to xofficio
Posted by xofficio
The people who offer negative opinions and views about RRXX and who openly state that DOA4 "looks better", is "animated better" etc. haven't got a leg to stand on. I was in contact with Konami's PR department early last year with suggestions about this game, which I asked them to forward to Yukes - so you see, I take this game and its content rather seriously.
Anyway, I guarantee you that when RRXX is released it will blow DOA4 and ANY other wrestling game right out of the water. It will have more features. The characters will be multi-dimensional in terms of game play ( altered looks will significantly alter strength/stamina/agility, etc.). The animation will be life-like and superb, not cartoon-ish with poorly proportioned toy-like characters involved in ultra-quick, non-human movements. The background scenery will put DOA4's and the rest of the childish junk out there to shame, and a lot more.
As for those wimpering, whipped, well-programmed souls who are scared to play this game because of being ostracized by those in society with a demented Feminist mindset, well, YOUR LOSS!
RRXX will end up set ting the standard for wrestling games for years to come - and will move the bar much higher for delivering a superb finished product.
Do..you work for Konami or something? Anyway looking good and I don't want to derail this into a thread about DOA4 so I'll leave it alone.
Commented on 2006-02-10 21:32:40
This message is in "Boulet Time" (TM), If you still *really* want to see it, click here

Commented on 2006-02-10 21:45:57
I don't have very high hopes for this game, mainly because it's a wrestling game. I don't like wrestling games.
Commented on 2006-02-10 22:29:43
If only DOA4 would have looked as good as this game.
Commented on 2006-02-10 23:06:47
Jesus Christ, you can't post one RRXX update without someone bringing up DOA4. If it's about which looks better, I'm going to point you in the direction of Google where you can look up real porn for free. That said I don't see the point of RRXX. The new multiplayer makes little sense to me since most people who bought the first game played by/with themselves. And I don't care how you thought DOA4 looked, DSPS9 (or whatever), because I've spent WELL over 100 hours on XBox Live with the game and I'm not disappointed.
Commented on 2006-02-10 23:29:32
Got news for you, synce, it takes a warped mind to somehow inject a designation of "Porn" onto RR or RRXX. There's nothing at all pornographic in it. It contains EROTIC elements - that is, playfully and humorously EROTIC elements - but it has nothing overtly sexual or pornographic * ( no kissing, no fondling, no sexually suggestive spread-legs posing, nothing). People who go off the deep end over exposure of the human form (but who see nothing wrong with games featuring human slaughter, ultra-violence, decapitation, etc.) are in need of help.
You say you don't see the point of RRXX? Well, what's the "point" of DOA4? What's the point of ANY game of any kind? ENTERTAINMENT, RIGHT?!
The fact that you're not disappointed in DOA4 means nothing in relation to its quality compared to RRXX. In DOA4, all the characters look the same - same facial features, same stove pipe-legs, same "plastic / doll / toy-like" look to them. And are there any differences in the moves they use on one another? Now consider the sophistication of RRXX which features characters who are significantly different from one another even in their default personas, and then add to this the Customization Feature which not only allows for drastic changes to the appearance of each character, BUT ALSO TO THEIR PERFORMANCE CAPABILITIES. Lastly, consider the life-like pace of movement, stamina levels, varying strength levels, etc. - all possibly differing greatly from one character to the next. Consider all that, and try to put something simplistic like DOA4 in the same ballpark for quality, repeat playability, and interesting play. Can't be done - not logically, anyway.
And, to top it all off, RRXX has EXCELLENT EYE CANDY!
Commented on 2006-02-11 01:29:15
hmmm...i'll pass on this one, i didn't even get to see the previous one :(

and judging by the comments i guess i didn't miss much :D
Commented on 2006-02-11 07:29:34
Another Japanese pervert simulator. Nice.

No.
Commented on 2006-02-11 14:47:06
I bet you'll be the first in line to get it Turtle, lol.
Commented on 2006-02-11 15:03:24
Comparing the FOURTH VARIANT outfit of an INDIAN GIRL to Lei-Fang's (a CHINESE girl... which herself is a Chun-Li rip-off) and the FOURTH VARIANT, maskless outfit of a MASKED WRESTLER to Ayane (a character that was ADMITEDLY based on Rei Ayanami)... It's retarded to say the least.
Commented on 2006-02-12 04:07:01
The similarities to DoA are no coincidence. The original RR's character designs were done by the same group that designed the look of DoA's characters, Polygon Magic. I don't think they're involved in RRXX (if they were I don't think the superstar outfits would look so horrible), but there are still many remnants of their style in the basic facial features of the characters.

And BTW, Aigle is Mongolian, not Indian. Which means she's from a country that's about as close to China as Canada is to the US.

And with that I've said all I can say about it. I won't be getting a 360.
Commented on 2006-02-12 04:21:17
gojira, Polygon Magic is not involved with DOA character design, thats all Team Ninja. They only did the crappy CG from the DOA games.
Commented on 2006-02-12 23:31:08
yeah please stop comparing cause its not even the same type of game.

About the game


What's up?
  • droezelke
    droezelke @Moonwalker: I agree. Other than the Metal Gear series, he didn't really present something as good. And I thought MGS5 was ultra boring (57 minutes ago)
  • nostradamus
    nostradamus never played snatcher, but policenauts has a awesome scenario. (1 Hour ago)
  • b0vril
    b0vril I never liked MGS series, but I loved 5 (1 Hour ago)
  • Tiz
    Tiz @Moonwalker: 2 is the best Metal Gear Solid though. (1 Hour ago)
  • Moonwalker
    Moonwalker Personally i find Kojima rather overrated. Yes MGS and MGS3 were fantastic, 2 wasn't nearly as good, same for 4 and 5....nah. (2 Hours ago)
  • nostradamus
    nostradamus @jmd749: Kojima Productions is independent. wrap that and give it away to your other half. (3 Hours ago)
  • GriftGFX
    GriftGFX Ultimates do drive big plays. Don't think it makes everyone Seagull. (3 Hours ago)
PreviousNext
  • Driftwood
    Driftwood GSY is getting some nice content at 3 pm CEST with our July podcast and some videos of the Deus Ex Mankind Divided preview build. :) (> 3 Months ago)
  • Driftwood
    Driftwood For once we'll be live at 4:30 pm CEST. Blim should not even be tired! (> 3 Months ago)
  • Driftwood
    Driftwood More Quantum Break coverage coming in a few hours, 9:00 a.m CEST. (> 3 Months ago)
  • Driftwood
    Driftwood We'll have a full review up for Firewatch at 7 pm CET. Videos will only be tomorrow though. (> 3 Months ago)
  • Driftwood
    Driftwood Tonight's livestream will be at 9:15 GMT+1, not GMT+2 as first stated. (> 3 Months ago)
  • Driftwood
    Driftwood New GSY Live dedicated this time to Just Cause 3 on Tuesday 9:30 GMT+2 (> 3 Months ago)
  • Driftwood
    Driftwood Join us tomorrow at 10 pm GMT+2 for a new livestream. We'll be playing Rise of the Tomb Raider. (> 3 Months ago)
PreviousNext
Top stories