X360 Thursday, October 9, 2008 | 11:58 AM

TGS08: Fable 2 images

TGS08: Fable 2 images

Microsoft also released a couple of images from Fable 2, which is only a couple of weeks away from release.


All comments

Page 1 2 >>
Commented on 2008-10-09 13:59:04
Ugh. 2 weeks and all we get continually is screenshots
Commented on 2008-10-09 15:29:38 In reply to Tinks
Posted by Tinks
Ugh. 2 weeks and all we get continually is screenshots
X-Play just did a nice "Fable 2 Exclusive" show on Tuesday, might find some footage on g4tv.com or youtube.com
Commented on 2008-10-09 15:30:29
#2. Seraphim much?
#3. Play golf much?
#5. Lush weeds much?

:D i cant wait
Commented on 2008-10-09 16:23:22
I'll be waiting for the co-op patch before I pick this game up.
Commented on 2008-10-09 16:57:56 In reply to Tinks
What?, if your really interested i the game there are new videos out there you just have to look, gamersyde as good as they are, are not the only place to find game media, as mentioned above xplay have an excellent Fable2 video blowout all the links can be found on here.

http://www.gamersyde.com/forum_8_27498_5_en.html#7...
Commented on 2008-10-09 17:14:13
i dont think the game LOOKS that impressive. i mean, is it bright? yes. is it colourfull? hell yes. is it stylistically awesome? hell yes... is it a technical marvel??? not really. but im sure it'll play really well. cant wait tbh, gonna be hard to keep my ass in gear education wise with this game taunting me.
Commented on 2008-10-09 17:41:50 In reply to twoism
Posted by twoism
I'll be waiting for the co-op patch before I pick this game up.
Oh noes, a week! I'll probably just get it day one, learn the basics and be fully prepared for co-op by the time it arrives.
Posted by KORNdog
is it bright? yes. is it colourfull? hell yes. is it stylistically awesome? hell yes... is it a technical marvel??? not really.
Don't get me wrong KORNdog, I'm not arguing with you, but "bright", "colourful" and "stylistically awesome" are the reasons I'm buying Fable 2. I don't give a damn how technical it is behind the scenes, I'm not reeeaally after cutting edge gameplay as long as it's just good solid fun.
Commented on 2008-10-09 18:18:25 In reply to DDRMidian
Posted by DDRMidian
Don't get me wrong KORNdog, I'm not arguing with you, but "bright", "colourful" and "stylistically awesome" are the reasons I'm buying Fable 2. I don't give a damn how technical it is behind the scenes, I'm not reeeaally after cutting edge gameplay as long as it's just good solid fun.
i was talking visually. not gameplay wise. stylistically its awesome, as you said its the reason you're buying the game, but the game isnt technically great looking, in terms of poly count or texture resolution. as i said tho, im looking forward to it.
Commented on 2008-10-09 18:32:10
Actually Fable 2 is cutting edge technically, textures are great, polygon counts is through the roof, has the best looking forests i have seen this generation too

Also there is nothing technically not impressive about dynamic shadowed light beams, stunningly modelled and detailed trees and foliage, 50+ NPC's on screen all self shadowed, houses without a loading time like Oblivion etc

It is a artistic and technical marvel actually
Commented on 2008-10-09 19:11:51 In reply to twoism
Posted by twoism
I'll be waiting for the co-op patch before I pick this game up.
the co-op patch is ready for day1 release now
http://kotaku.com/5061048/fable-ii-online-co+op-so...
Commented on 2008-10-09 19:32:18 In reply to labwarrior
Posted by labwarrior
Actually Fable 2 is cutting edge technically, textures are great, polygon counts is through the roof, has the best looking forests i have seen this generation too

Also there is nothing technically not impressive about dynamic shadowed light beams, stunningly modelled and detailed trees and foliage, 50+ NPC's on screen all self shadowed, houses without a loading time like Oblivion etc

It is a artistic and technical marvel actually
lol, no, it really isnt

but then that doesnt matter when artistically it looks so great. art style can make up for technical shortcomings. so its all good
Commented on 2008-10-09 20:10:10
KORNdog i thnik u r a Super PS3 fanboy!
Poly count looks realy great for a open world game like this.
Commented on 2008-10-09 20:23:54 In reply to mehdino1
Posted by mehdino1
KORNdog i thnik u r a Super PS3 fanboy!
Poly count looks realy great for a open world game like this.
how so, if i was i wouldnt be supporting the game and the developers by buying the limited edition. and i certainly wouldnt be complimenting its awesome fairy tale art style. but the game doesnt shine technically, you only have to look at the screens to see that. but your right, im sorry for having an opinion. the game looks amazing and is the second coming of christ....there, that make you feel better?
Commented on 2008-10-09 20:54:58
I think this game looks fantastic, what everyone has to realise is everyone can have there own views, i love how it looks as do many others inc the gameing sites, so to each there own.
Commented on 2008-10-09 21:02:22 In reply to BLackHawkodst
Posted by BLackHawkodst
I think this game looks fantastic, what everyone has to realise is everyone can have there own views, i love how it looks as do many others inc the gameing sites, so to each there own.
it does look good, great even...but from an artistic standpoint. technically the game has serious LOD, OK textures, aliasing issues etc etc. its an OK looking game graphically. but i dont think it comes anywhere close to many other games out there currently and coming soon. but as i've already said, the art style makes up for a lot of its visual shortcomings becasue its completely different to anything else out there. so it makes it all ok. i mean, if this had an art style that was very much set in reality, i think overall the game would look pretty damn average. as is tho, with the fairy tale art style. it looks great, and very unique to boot
Commented on 2008-10-09 21:11:35 In reply to KORNdog
Regardless i think it looks fantastic and cant wait to get my hands on it.
Commented on 2008-10-09 21:46:07
no, it is disappointing graphically in screen shots for sure.. some are even compairable to fable 1 screens. In motion though it looks alot better, theres a sense that the world is alive..and it has a nice tim burton art design to it. One thing that i personaly believe distracts is the last generation level of fog that follows you around.. i dont see how thats acceptable these days, and maybe a sign that instead of building their own engine and wasting a few years they should of stuck with the unreal 3 one as originally planned. Not saying we would of had the game sooner.. but we would of definatly had a working co-op on the disc.
Commented on 2008-10-09 23:16:06
I really do not see how

- dynamic shadowed light beams
- shaders everywhere
- translucency in tree leaves
- shadows from every single leaf on every other
- 50+ NPC's on screen self shadowed
- huge landscapes fulled with detailed trees, forests, cities and houses with no loading

.. is not considered technically impressive

Actually Fable 2 is one of the most technically impressive games this gen, they just forcus on other things than best textures, and that is exactly what makes the art look so sweet
Commented on 2008-10-09 23:30:57 In reply to Tinks
Posted by Tinks
Ugh. 2 weeks and all we get continually is screenshots
Well yeah... Because they want you to experience the game on your 360, not your computer.
Commented on 2008-10-09 23:52:24
These images suck, i can say,
gameplay videos look much better, atleast in country side,
the town also doesn`t look impressive...
Commented on 2008-10-10 02:05:26
Another knockout 360 exclusive! Win!
Commented on 2008-10-10 03:06:36
Lion Head- "Looks like Day One Patch."



http://community.lionhead.com/blogs/fable_2_develo...
Commented on 2008-10-10 05:31:49
I'm with KORNdog on this one. Artistically, the game looks phenomenal, and I think it's going to looks TONS better on a nice hdtv and in motion. Technically, however,... it really doesn't look like it can hold a candle to Gears 2, KZ2, or RE5.

That said, it's going to be one of the few SP games I actually pick up because if it's anything like the first, I know I'll enjoy it tons.
Commented on 2008-10-10 08:35:34 In reply to KORNdog
Posted by KORNdog
i was talking visually. not gameplay wise. stylistically its awesome, as you said its the reason you're buying the game, but the game isnt technically great looking, in terms of poly count or texture resolution. as i said tho, im looking forward to it.
Okay?
Do you look at a painting based on how many paint-molecules there are, or based on the actual artwork?
Do you listen to music because of how many vibrating atoms are generated in your room, or because of the art in the song itself?
Do you read a book based on how many words there are, or based on how the story is?

Nuff said, i think i made my point :)
Technical stuff is pointless. Its the artistic style that matters, and its all that matters.
Look at the old over-used-in-comparisons WoW, it has craptacularly low-res textures and low-poly models, yet some enviroments look truly amazing, artistically.

Obviously newer gen games are gonna look nicer than old-gen games, due to better technology etc. Such as softer lighting, softer grass and trees, less flat shaders and stuff.
But comparing current-gen to current-gen tech is pointless. Its what they do with the tech that matters.
I'd rather look at Fable 2 than Crysis, which is a technical marvel, but still looks like shit. Its like comparing a painting with a blueprint. Blueprints have no soul.
Commented on 2008-10-10 09:38:40 In reply to Ronsauce
This message is in "Boulet Time" (TM), If you still *really* want to see it, click here

Page 1 2 >>

About the game


What's up?
  • asdfg
    asdfg Such a nice celebration of their 30th anniversary by breaking their whole service. (1 Hour ago)
  • asdfg
    asdfg Screw it, I'm gonna try out the new Rocket League update by a company that actually communicates when their servers go down or have issues. (1 Hour ago)
  • asdfg
    asdfg Ubi servers have been terrible all night with minimal communication from Ubisoft. (1 Hour ago)
  • KORNdog
    KORNdog @GriftGFX: yup. Was free a while ago. Boss rush game, pretty tough. Some overly long winded bosses, but its a pretty stylish game. (2 Hours ago)
  • GriftGFX
    GriftGFX Has anyone played Furi? Looks really neat: [url] (2 Hours ago)
  • GriftGFX
    GriftGFX @aphex187: I wouldn't bother.. controls feel like poo and I really don't think it's going anywhere on the W10 store. (4 Hours ago)
  • amerakindesi
    amerakindesi @Tiz: the new halo 5 "gifting" thing is stupid. who the hell would actually do that? (4 Hours ago)
PreviousNext
  • Driftwood
    Driftwood GSY is getting some nice content at 3 pm CEST with our July podcast and some videos of the Deus Ex Mankind Divided preview build. :) (> 3 Months ago)
  • Driftwood
    Driftwood For once we'll be live at 4:30 pm CEST. Blim should not even be tired! (> 3 Months ago)
  • Driftwood
    Driftwood More Quantum Break coverage coming in a few hours, 9:00 a.m CEST. (> 3 Months ago)
  • Driftwood
    Driftwood We'll have a full review up for Firewatch at 7 pm CET. Videos will only be tomorrow though. (> 3 Months ago)
  • Driftwood
    Driftwood Tonight's livestream will be at 9:15 GMT+1, not GMT+2 as first stated. (> 3 Months ago)
  • Driftwood
    Driftwood New GSY Live dedicated this time to Just Cause 3 on Tuesday 9:30 GMT+2 (> 3 Months ago)
  • Driftwood
    Driftwood Join us tomorrow at 10 pm GMT+2 for a new livestream. We'll be playing Rise of the Tomb Raider. (> 3 Months ago)
PreviousNext
Top stories