All comments

Visually, looks pretty awesome. I'm less confident about the gameplay, but who knows.

There's nothing really special about this type of trailer. It seems to obviously geared towards the cliches of this genre.

That totally did NOT sound as the Battlefield 3 trailers at all. As the above post indicates.

I didn't say it did..

It's unremarkable, and does the typical thing of covering itself up with fast editing & exciting music.

Hopefully the campaign will be longer than the previous game.

Great graphics, good settings, I hope the gameplay is fun in SP, but above all, I am more excited to see how the MP side of it turns out since thats the decision factor of me buying it or not.
First one lacked weapons, settings, just overal depth, hopefully it changes now.

Definitely PC footage, looks very good, but I wonder what daylight will look like. I hope they will really focus on the SP campaign (that is what MoH should be about), and that it will be longer than the last game.

The previous game was the most generic and dull shooter i have ever played, the only thing this game has got going for it is the frostbite engine.

All looks so new. Love it
Thanks EA!

The best part is that DICE is no longer obligated to help develop it. I approve of this.

Hopefully they can start fixing their already released game now lol

11%

11% working game, yes lol

Looks pretty, but is it pretty beyond the shell? Who knows, but I'm not expecting wonders.

I thought the feel of the guns in singleplayer was easily the most satisfying of the modern shooters.

They still make single player campaigns with these games? After trying to suffer through BF3's interactive movie sequence er I mean "campaign", I figured they would all just say screw it, let's focus on the MP. Don't get me wrong, I'm a SP gamer, I just can't remember the last time I played a decent SP shooter game. At least I have Sniper Elite to look forward to..........

you do realize the medal of honor games started off as singleplayer games right? battlefield was never a single player game. it would make sense if BF3 didn't have a campaign, but MOH coming without one is sort of a slap to the face to anyone who was a fan of the original games.

My point was that pretty much all first person shooter SP campaigns seem to be tacked on nowadays. COD, BF, MOH, etc all have extremely linear, heavily scripted, short campaigns, with terrible AI. I would love a good SP 1st person shooter as I can't stand playing MP, but with the effort that the devs put into them, they might as well not bother. Do you really think this one will be any different?

the way I see it, there is only so much you can do with multiplayer that even if you focused the entire dev team on the MP there is no guarantee it will be a great game. you also have to take into account that not everyone has an internet connection or an xbox live gold account, so they will lose many sales if they shipped it with multiplayer only. companies will focus on whatever aspects of a game that can get them the maximum number of sales possible, and by adding a campaign they are getting sales from not just multiplayer fans but singleplayer fans as well

Looks really nice. I just hope its not gonna loose that great feeling like previous MoH and its not gonna slide into more CoD gameplay. I want it more real, less action. Oh....and I demant the music will be made by Ramin Djawadi, like in previous game.

.... and you hear the first buzzing bass war sound jumping thru BF3 style. LOL!

Wow a dazzling display of out of the box thinking.

I have a strong feeling it will be more fun than BF3 for me.
If they focus on infantry combat, no perks and no killstreaks with alot of depth of weapon customization and ALOT of weapons and good maps, it would be good.

As long as the weapon and movements doesnt handle shit like BF3.

like nothing I've seen before.

Bravo, Company, Bravo.

I actually think having a massive range of weapons and attachments is detrimental to shooters.