| Forums-> Main forum-> Call of Duty 4 thread: << 1 ... 25 26 |
| Author | Message |
| GriftGFX He can also ban your ass! Since 1538 Days |
2008-06-06 15:08:44 In reply to TheBeagle (2008-06-06 13:45:25) Posted by TheBeagle Hmm. I really hate tearing though. Even when your FPS is high, the screen has this weird feel to it without Vsync. You can tell when it's about to tear and to me that feels almost as bad as a frame drop. I almost always use VSync (when using a rig that will push 60+) in single player games, but in MP I don't want any frame data sacrificed, ever. Although I do have two binds set up, one that locks my max fps @ 125, and another that locks it @ 60 for the sake of smoothness. Still, I almost always keep it locked at 125 anyway. I'm digging the new content. It's fun. |
| Isomac Since 1305 Days |
2008-06-07 15:33:48 In reply to GriftGFX (2008-06-06 08:14:53) 1000 kills that's just insane. The other 1000 is a lot too but something I can get someday too :p --- |
| TheBeagle Since 1143 Days |
2008-06-07 15:34:41 Oh we've all done that. That is why they are there. --- |
| GriftGFX He can also ban your ass! Since 1538 Days |
2008-06-07 22:11:03 Yea I did that a few times the first time I played Killhouse--I had to do a double take. It's actually pretty funny when you think about it. What's even funnier, is that in front of those mock soldiers are spawn spots, so occasionally you may even pass them by thinking they're just targets. It's probably best to shoot at them just to make sure ;) |
| TheBeagle Since 1143 Days |
2008-06-07 22:45:34 Dude.... --- |
| LEBATO IS WRONG Since 1660 Days |
2008-06-08 00:55:39 Wow Grift, the graphics you are running on suck major ass. Like no AF, no textures, crappy resolution.......ewww. --- |
| GriftGFX He can also ban your ass! Since 1538 Days |
2008-06-08 01:14:04 In reply to LEBATO (2008-06-08 00:55:39) Posted by LEBATO Wow Grift, the graphics you are running on suck major ass. Like no AF, no textures, crappy resolution.......ewww. But hey, the console version has shit for texture filtering and is sub 720p too ;) "It looks better in motion." |
| alimokrane Since 1468 Days |
2008-06-09 15:47:46 I wasnt sure this required a new thread so I am posting it here --- |
| mt_sabao Since 969 Days |
2008-06-09 17:23:13 In reply to GriftGFX (2008-06-08 01:14:04) Posted by GriftGFX Yup. Low everything. No AA, no AF, 800x600. Frames FTW. I could bump it up a lot, but I'm not willing to sacrifice the performance. I'll turn it up when I get better hardware to run it on. I'll be playing this game for a long time anyway. Oh, and don't forget the increased FOV--I hate the way it makes the game look but I can't not use it knowing that other people are. But hey, the console version has shit for texture filtering and is sub 720p too ;) "It looks better in motion." |
| GriftGFX He can also ban your ass! Since 1538 Days |
2008-06-09 17:34:42 In reply to alimokrane (2008-06-09 15:47:46) Posted by mt_sabao Run it wireframe! Heard you'll get an extra 12fps and average 2.3 k/d ratio, now that will impress your friends! COD2 actually ran better on this PC, thanks to the ability to use DX7. I could set the textures up and run it @ 1680x1050, but IW decided to give us less options so far as turning down the shaders in COD4, so I'm stuck with lowering the resolution, and the majority of my other settings, in order to get competitive performance in multiplayer. Oh, and I know you're just being a complete asshole and everything, but if you could play it in wire frame, you'd probably get hundreds of FPS. You could also see through walls, which would make it cheating. But why would I bother pointing that out when you're just being a complete tool anyway? Must be bored! Posted by alimokrane I wasnt sure this required a new thread so I am posting it here Call of duty 5 details - WWII and CO-OP for the first time in the series. http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=14... It was said that IW was trying to negotiate a deal with Activision to stop the Treyarch madness. I guess that was either a bunk rumor, or just won't effect the development of COD5. |
| mt_sabao Since 969 Days |
2008-06-09 18:14:39 In reply to GriftGFX (2008-06-09 17:34:42) Posted by GriftGFX Oh, and I know you're just being a complete asshole and everything, but if you could play it in wire frame, you'd probably get hundreds of FPS. You could also see through walls, which would make it cheating Posted by GriftGFX Must be bored! Posted by GriftGFX Neat. I'll have to play it, even though I despise Treyarch. I enjoyed the pain that was Call of Duty 3, for some reason, and I do love the WWII weapons and setting. |
| alimokrane Since 1468 Days |
2008-06-09 18:31:54 Scans of COD5 are out there if you wanna have a look at them ;) The game really doesnt look too bad! Co OP is for 2-4 people! multiplayer from 2-16. Looks like there is offline co-op for 2 people - So people in the other thread can stop complaining :D ;) Also Player can swim now! (not that it's a revolutionnary thing but it never was possible in COD) --- |
| TheBeagle Since 1143 Days |
2008-06-09 18:35:51 Grift, it is mentioned in that link that the game will be coming to PC also. I think that is the only place I will be playing it...and just for the single player. --- |
| GriftGFX He can also ban your ass! Since 1538 Days |
2008-06-09 18:53:26 In reply to TheBeagle (2008-06-09 18:35:51) Posted by mt_sabao No shit Mr. Obvious? And go easy on the insults mk? To Infinity Ward's credit, they removed DX7 from Call of Duty 4 for that very reason. They didn't want people to be able to go light on effects in order to give themselves an unfair advantage over the noobs who either don't care or don't know better. In a way I appreciate that effort, but, as someone who is actually using hardware that's several generations old.. I'm not sure it's exactly fair either. I'm not sure why they didn't remove the manual FOV setting though. Personally I'd rather play the game @ 16:10 instead of the goofy FOV everyone uses for competition, and honestly, I don't think it really makes that big of a difference.. but again, it comes down to feeling like I'm giving myself a handicap if I don't.. even if it doesn't really matter. Oh I know, lets all play on a console--level the playing field, right? Not only is that a load of shit, since there are other factors that weigh in on your multi-player experience (lag/host advantage, P2P FTW, right?--SD versus HD, etc), but it's also a bit like entering a bicycle race where everyone is riding the same piece of shit.. and to top it all off, everyone has flat tires (except the host, of course), handlebars that don't actually steer, and training wheels. That'll make it more fun right? Posted by mt_sabao Did you tried MoH: Airborne? I too was a sucker for WWII, but i couldn't stand it anymore and only gave MoH: Airborne a try because i found it cheap and i was damn pleasantly surprised. Gameplay+gfx were realy cool, but then again this was on the 360 with all the aiming assists and dumbing down they have for us kids ;) I'm quite looking forward to the new Brothers in Arms too, even though I've never played any other game in the franchise. Posted by alimokrane Scans of COD5 are out there if you wanna have a look at them ;) The game really doesnt look too bad! Co OP is for 2-4 people! multiplayer from 2-16. Looks like there is offline co-op for 2 people - So people in the other thread can stop complaining :D ;) Also Player can swim now! (not that it's a revolutionnary thing but it never was possible in COD) Posted by TheBeagle Grift, it is mentioned in that link that the game will be coming to PC also. I think that is the only place I will be playing it...and just for the single player. |
| GriftGFX He can also ban your ass! Since 1538 Days |
2008-06-29 06:16:23 This is old news by now but FYI, the 1.7 patch is out. |
| TheBeagle Since 1143 Days |
2008-06-29 18:12:16 Anything note worthy? --- |
| GriftGFX He can also ban your ass! Since 1538 Days |
2008-06-29 18:16:57 Not really.. just a hotfix, mostly to fix some server side stuff it seems. I think they may have messed with some exploitive jumps too, but I could have just missed the mark when I was trying to land on one in District. It's pretty much required regardless. |
| TheBeagle Since 1143 Days |
2008-06-29 18:30:03 I guess you have to support a game that has sold so well. Is it the most played PC FPS at the moment? --- |
| GriftGFX He can also ban your ass! Since 1538 Days |
2008-06-29 18:40:49 I think Counter Strike 1.6 still holds the crown by a reasonably large margin, but it's probably in a solid second place, followed by Source. There are literally hundreds of thousands of people all over the world playing CS every day still, ten years later, and clocking a ridiculous amount of time in it too. |
| LEBATO IS WRONG Since 1660 Days |
2008-06-30 00:24:45 In reply to TheBeagle (2008-06-29 18:30:03) Posted by TheBeagle I guess you have to support a game that has sold so well. Is it the most played PC FPS at the moment? And the one I play the most would have to be CSS. --- |
| GriftGFX He can also ban your ass! Since 1538 Days |
2008-06-30 15:35:39 They haven't stopped supporting the console version freely in terms of patching it, it's just.. slower. I guess that makes sense though, since the PC version does not require any form of certification, it makes a good testing ground for hotfixes that could be applied to both. |
| TheBeagle Since 1143 Days |
2008-06-30 16:01:41 I think because of certification they wait until they have a more substantial amount of changes before bringing out patches. Console players seem to be less aware of these things in general anyway. I bet the majority of players on XBL are fairly happy with the way the game is at the moment. --- |
| Inflatable Since 2176 Days |
2008-06-30 21:17:43 In reply to GriftGFX (2008-06-29 18:40:49) Posted by GriftGFX I think Counter Strike 1.6 still holds the crown by a reasonably large margin, but it's probably in a solid second place, followed by Source. There are literally hundreds of thousands of people all over the world playing CS every day still, ten years later, and clocking a ridiculous amount of time in it too. I played some oldskool DM with Quake4 and UT2004 in the meantime, and nowadays I'm more into CoD4 and TF2.. I really like the pixar-style Valve has put in TF2, and the game is so full of humor, it's crackin'.. And offcourse RTS games, I still play a lot of Company of Heroes, a highly strategic RTS game set in WWII with awesome physics and graphics.. And I recently started playing Settlers VI for it's SP, which is a very fun relaxing gaming for me.. --- |
| TheBeagle Since 1143 Days |
2008-07-03 13:16:03 Grift, I was wondering if you could post that insane video of Shipment again. I can't find it in the thread. --- |
| GriftGFX He can also ban your ass! Since 1538 Days |
2008-07-03 15:45:27 In reply to Inflatable (2008-06-30 21:17:43) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gpp43YnKCJM Posted by Inflatable Yeah, crazy how popular CS still is, especially the old CS 1.6.. I lost interest in the game when my clan stopped playing matches back in 2005, played CS since the very fist beta mod (summer 1999).. Did some CS:Source just for fun, but then lost interest completly.. I played some oldskool DM with Quake4 and UT2004 in the meantime, and nowadays I'm more into CoD4 and TF2.. I really like the pixar-style Valve has put in TF2, and the game is so full of humor, it's crackin'.. And offcourse RTS games, I still play a lot of Company of Heroes, a highly strategic RTS game set in WWII with awesome physics and graphics.. And I recently started playing Settlers VI for it's SP, which is a very fun relaxing gaming for me.. |
| Forums-> Main forum-> Call of Duty 4 thread: << 1 ... 25 26 |
You have to be logged in to post in this forum!
Log in
- 9 Aliens vs Predator multiplayer trailer
- 15 Mass Effect 2: Two more vieos
- 15 Lost Planet 2 images
- 23 Ryu Ga Gotoku 4 trailer
- 7 Kingdom Under Fire 2 trailer
- 23 Final Fantasy XIII trailer
- 26 Crackdown 2 images
Top stories
About
- Copyright 2007-2009 Gamersyde SARL
