| Forums-> Main forum-> GT5 - new info: 1 2 3 >> |
| Author | Message |
KORNdog Since 944 Days |
2009-08-19 00:45:41 GT5 - new info August 18, held in Cologne in Germany from "gamescom" at the Gran Turismo 5 has been announced for the latest Here are the following announcement. 1,000 vehicles 170 Premium new models (full interior modeling, interior corresponds to damage) 830 kinds of standard model (some are from Gran Turismo 4 that have been carried over) [Read: Cars we have seen in GT4 before] ? Courses 60 courses confirmed with 20 or more to be revealed ? physical simulation of vehicles Physics system simulation is brand new Represented is full fall in vehicles [possibly rollover!] Damage representation (reproduced in full by real-time collision deformation) faithfully reproducing the behavior of electric cars, i.e. Prius, Insight, hybrid cars and the latest Tesla ? arcade mode Single Race 2 player battle ? GT Mode World Map My Garage Car Dealer Tuning Shop (parts, tires) Car Washes/Oil Change Race Championship (Series system, point system) License Test ? Online Open Lobby Text / Voice Chat Private rooms Online Photo Album ONRAINRIPUREIARUBAMU YouTube replay output ? Photo Mode Photo Drive (Circuit) Photo stage (Stage Photo mode only) ? Gran Turismo TV Video output to a PSP or PSP Go Progressive Download Improved user interface Continuous Play for videos ? Museums The Gran Turismo 5 Prologue version, plus more information at TGS ? Sound Custom soundtracks (Use songs from your PS3 hard-drive) Dolby Digital 5.1 and 7.1 ? User Interface The Gran Turismo 5 Prologue, and the same design concept. The icons change color Able to track the movement of Cockpit Camera interface (confirmed in full 3-D. The camera can be fully manipulated and you can opt to have your head tracked by the PSEye) source - http://uk.ps3.ign.com/articles/101/1015164p1.html |
Optimusv2 Since 1432 Days |
2009-08-19 01:27:03 I'd be interested in seeing how their do their physics and damage. --- |
| KORNdog Since 944 Days |
2009-08-19 01:32:59 In reply to Optimusv2 (2009-08-19 01:27:03) Posted by Optimusv2 I'd be interested in seeing how their do their physics and damage. |
| deftangel Hot stuff!  Since 1408 Days |
2009-08-19 02:19:45 Does this have a release date yet? --- |
| LEBATO IS WRONG  Since 1662 Days |
2009-08-19 04:31:51 Man, I wish we had some true new information you know. This translation thing is just bad. --- |
| KORNdog Since 944 Days |
2009-08-19 13:51:24 In reply to LEBATO (2009-08-19 04:31:51) Posted by LEBATO Man, I wish we had some true new information you know. This translation thing is just bad. 1000 cars is just crazy, even when they'll have 34 Skylines, that is crazy. 170 premium models? WTF is this? I mean, in one way it sounds awesome (interior damage!), but is this going to happen only in 170 cars? Is any other type of damage also applicable here? In other words, are 170 the only ones we'll see damage on? That would be stupid. 60 courses.....Hmnn...True courses or is this a bloated number Forza style? I'm thinking it's not *that* bloated because GT4 had quite a few tracks. Represented in full fall? lol, whatever that means. Youtube replay output? OMG, the spam will be unbearable. No release date yet, incredible........ |
| Thor Since 306 Days |
2009-08-19 23:35:38 pretty sweet damage here... door and bumper... awesome stuff, they really pulled it off: |
IRAIPT0IR Since 248 Days |
2009-08-19 23:53:18 I remember when this game was announced back in 1987 XD --- |
| LEBATO IS WRONG Since 1662 Days |
2009-08-20 03:44:11 Because my post came a bit late in the news: Honestly, Kaz has made an ass out of himself--and his fans--over and over. He's probably the biggest bullshitter out there. First he was throwing that bullshit of "manufacturers won't let us", then FM came in and made PD look rather stupid. Then, since he could no longer use that excuse, he said that since their standards were so high, they were not going to do damage until they could do it right, realistic, and some other crap. Then theys show this thing. Don't get me wrong, it looks cool,......but this is far from great damage. It's crappy damage for the big deal they were making it out to be. There's barely--if any--body deformation at all whatsoever. I saw better damage in rally games this past generation. Rallisport Challenge, and a multitude of PC sims. In this game, it's like the car has "hit points", on door hinges, bumpers, and that's it. The bumper will apparently fall off, but there is barely any damage to it. In fact, I didn't even see a scrath on it. It's a bit perplexing to say the least. It's just more bullshit from Kaz. In certain aspects (and unless we are missing something, ie. not the way it'll look on release), FM damage looks better. In what aspects? Well, in FM there seems to be more body deformation, and A LOT of scratches, broken windshields, headlights, etc etc. And then, not all cars have damage. It creates an inconsistent environmnet. Again, for making an ass out of himself for so long, you'd at least expect all cars to have damage. Oh, yeah, inconsistency is such a high standard. I loved the fact that the engine is also modeled, but then again, is this also on a few "select" vehicles. lol. What a joke. Seriously, I thought the guys at T10 (mainly Greenawalt) made an ass of themselves with some of the things they say, but this dude is something else. Ah well. --- |
A_M Since 543 Days |
2009-08-20 03:58:30 TBH when it comes to damage on the cars, I got a sneaking suspicion from the E3 trailer that it's only implement on rally cars. From the footage that was shown at gamescon it seems (so far) that it is only on the rally cars. I say this cos when you look at the gamersyde footage of the damage, you see a white Evo (non rally version) which crashes into the rally subaru. |
| LEBATO IS WRONG Since 1662 Days |
2009-08-20 04:44:27 In reply to A_M (2009-08-20 03:58:30) Posted by A_M TBH when it comes to damage on the cars, I got a sneaking suspicion from the E3 trailer that it's only implement on rally cars. From the footage that was shown at gamescon it seems (so far) that it is only on the rally cars. I say this cos when you look at the gamersyde footage of the damage, you see a white Evo (non rally version) which crashes into the rally subaru. Now the subaru takes damage but the road version of the evo drives off with no damage at all, which for now makes me think that the damage is only extended to rally cars. I guess we will have to wait until there is conformation from PD themselves on which cars do have damage. There is still the debate of whether or not we'll get 1000 cockpits. They better though. If T10 managed to do 400+, why couldn't PD have done a 1000 with a million years in development? Also, I guess I'm the only who noticed something terrible was missing in that leaked release of info. There was *no word* on weather, or time of day change. What's up with that? Kaz also said that was going to be part of the game. Seriously, if they dropped this one, Yamamuchi will officially become one of biggest assholes when it comes to the video games industry. --- |
| Tomarru Since 612 Days |
2009-08-20 11:13:50 A lot of us have had suspicions for a while as to how close to the touted feature set the game will actually get and as time drags on it seems more and more likely that features are only gonna be half assed like the damage or the cockpits. If PD miss their targets like T10 missed theirs in FM2 and no day/night in FM3 expect it to receive every bit the same flak. I was comparing FM3 to GT5 in the forza thread and ended up getting warnings and all sorts, i still feel FM2 is a weak game compared to where it should have been, especially visually, and some of the decisions taken in FM3 left me disappointed. However if the bar is missed by as much is being speculated by GT5 (and the words coming out of PD are very selective) then i cant be anything but disappointed aswell. |
| A_M Since 543 Days |
2009-08-20 14:40:26 In reply to LEBATO (2009-08-20 04:44:27) Posted by LEBATO Yeah, some people believe that, some others are saying damage is only going to be there for race cars (of any cars, including rally). Pretty dumb actually, it's non-sense almost. There is still the debate of whether or not we'll get 1000 cockpits. They better though. If T10 managed to do 400+, why couldn't PD have done a 1000 with a million years in development? Also, I guess I'm the only who noticed something terrible was missing in that leaked release of info. There was *no word* on weather, or time of day change. What's up with that? Kaz also said that was going to be part of the game. Seriously, if they dropped this one, Yamamuchi will officially become one of biggest assholes when it comes to the video games industry. |
| LEBATO IS WRONG Since 1662 Days |
2009-08-20 22:28:29 What's wrong with *^that* guy? --- |
Jin187 Since 1284 Days |
2009-08-21 02:16:36 Heres another gameplay video |
| LEBATO IS WRONG Since 1662 Days |
2009-08-21 05:36:26 In reply to Jin187 (2009-08-21 02:16:36) Posted by Jin187 Heres another gameplay video http://www.eurogamer.net/videos/gran-turismo-5-sho... Cars look really nice as always, but A.I, Collision Physic and Car Physics still remain unchanged since GT3 and having damage only on 15% of the cars is pretty retarded to be honest. --- |
| KORNdog Since 944 Days |
2009-08-21 13:17:39 In reply to LEBATO (2009-08-21 05:36:26) Posted by LEBATO Collisions have definitely improved, you have to go watch some GT3/4 to see some true pinball action. Physics, I don't know. AI continues to be completely retarded. |
| Jin187 Since 1284 Days |
2009-08-21 14:31:08 In reply to KORNdog (2009-08-21 13:17:39) Posted by KORNdog i dont think the Ai is retarded, they make for some stiff competition, it's the fact they dont seem to be all that "human", they stick to a race line like nothing i've ever seen, but then pro racers do the very same thing. the main issue with the AI is that they dont seem that aware of the player or anyone else. they simply follow their line, and if you hit them, they dont really react, they just carry on with their race line. it was better in prologue then it was in 3/4, but they're a little TOO perfect in the way they drive. |
| Jin187 Since 1284 Days |
2009-09-02 20:21:32 Finally, some new Screenshots :) |
| LEBATO IS WRONG Since 1662 Days |
2009-09-03 03:03:46 Those are very old actually. At least 2 weeks now. --- |
| Thor Since 306 Days |
2009-09-07 08:56:19 What I read today made me gasp and wanting to have it with even less patience, GT5 is confirmed to be the first console game that utilizes "3D head-tracking" with the use of PS-Eye... in plus of 3D stereoscopy! |
Jollipop Since 1423 Days |
2009-09-07 09:16:33 In reply to Thor (2009-09-07 08:56:19) Posted by Thor What I read today made me gasp and wanting to have it with even less patience, GT5 is confirmed to be the first console game that utilizes "3D head-tracking" with the use of PS-Eye... in plus of 3D stereoscopy! Here's what PSinsider writes: "First of all, there is the full head tracking offered by PlayStation Eye. Move your head forward while in cockpit view, you see more of the car around you, as if you are looking through a window rather than a flat screen (see the video below for an example). Turn it to the side, look out your side window. This alone brings the level of visual realism miles beyond what has ever been done in a videogame before." More here: http://psinsider.e-mpire.com/index.php?categoryid=... With the features KORNdog collected above and the photorealism in mind, doubled with these tendencies in 3D above... this has got to be the most immersive racing experience ever! I have the PSEye and there is no way im setting it up just for that. Now if they could implement head tracking on those 3D glasses that would be something to be talking about. --- |
| deftangel Hot stuff! Since 1408 Days |
2009-09-07 13:44:14 Gimmick but neat I'd say. --- |
| KORNdog Since 944 Days |
2009-09-07 13:57:52 In reply to Jollipop (2009-09-07 09:16:33) Posted by Jollipop Gimmick. I have the PSEye and there is no way im setting it up just for that. Now if they could implement head tracking on those 3D glasses that would be something to be talking about. |
Viginti_Tres Since 1042 Days |
2009-09-07 21:50:06 Actually headtracking is pretty cool. It's much more substantial than 3D that requires two consoles, a new TV and glasses. Not sure if you have an idea of how it works and looks like but here is some basics (MS hired the guy for Natal): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jd3-eiid-Uw |
| Forums-> Main forum-> GT5 - new info: 1 2 3 >> |
You have to be logged in to post in this forum!
Log in
- 14 Guy, Cody et Adon in Super SFIV
- 8 The First 10 Minutes: Saw
- 26 Final Fantasy XIII trailer
- 13 Aliens vs Predator multiplayer trailer
- 8 Avatar: Dev Diary #4
- 3 Gameplay of Gravity Crash
- 6 Darksiders weapons trailer
-
-
SimonM7 Sorry, imagine THEM standing on THEIR own I meant to say. (31 minutes ago) -
SimonM7 The games counterpart is the interaction, the rules of it, the mechanics. Yet many seem to vastly value its storytelling component over those. Or rather, be unable to imagine it standing on its own. (33 minutes ago)
-
SimonM7 Sure, but games are much more than storytelling devices, unlike movies. Sure, a song can move you with lyrics, but we listen for the melody, something a book can't give us. (35 minutes ago)
-
Ronsauce If paintings/sculptures /movies/fashion can all be praised for their esthetics, I'm sure games can too. (39 minutes ago) -
Ronsauce @SimonM7: I always thought the debate was whether games were art, NOT whether they are their own artform...which they would be if they were art in the first place. (42 minutes ago)
-
Doom_Bringer ATI makes the crappiest GPU's seriously, my GPU keeps freezing and crashing my computer after a 30 min intense workout. Didn't the 360 ATI GPU have the same problem? Cheap bastards (1 Hour ago)
Top stories
About
- Copyright 2007-2009 Gamersyde SARL