All comments

Hmm, well, some textures look just too dissapointing!
Only look at the red bricks!!!
The athmosphere seems to be okay, but does this game bring st new???

It brings that: "Been there, done that, got a t-shirt" kind of feeling....

that big old concrete tower thing looks a bit tasty. Still not sure it's got anything over the UBI one..... yet

Probably not. I'd like to see a game played from the German perspective maybe? SO tired of shooting Gerry... Let's shoot brits instead! (Preferably chavs...)

man, the texturing looks horrible, i want a WW2 FPS where you play as the germans trying to win the war, least that would be more interesting, but only game im ever gonna get thats close to that is turning point : fall of liberty, but thats not really the same

yeah this game looks worse everytime I see it. I think cod3 is the last ww2 game im gonna play. Ive played too many and none bring anything new to the table really. Call of duty 4 looks amazing, i just hope it doesnt play like cod3 otherwise its just a coat of paint.

WW2 fps' ftw.

Ezekiel, MOH itself plays totally different from cod. Dunno what you're mumbling about.

i can't say I am looking forward to this after seeing COD4

cod3 looks better...but ill probably get this coz i love FPS

Im getting this!
Loved the MoH games and the whole Airborne aspect should be good!
I think the GFX look good! Maybe not CoD GFX, but do the GFX always make the game better? No!
Look at Gears of War! Looks good boring as hell!

Gears of War is boring? I guess there are taste for everyone.. lol

Did you guys watch the Gamespot live demo? The game looks amazing!! This is going to be the best WWII shooter ever IMO

What?? Never heard saiying someone Guirs of War is boring before...
Well, if you think so ^^
But you're right with the grafix! I love Resistance, which has really ugly grafx on some places.
But gameplay is cool, very great story, and man, what an athmosphere during gameplay.
So, why not this one, grafix is not THE argument for buying a game, it's either secondary!!

I heard that it was said in OXM preview that this game would be running at 60fps. Anyone can confirm that? If true grpahics are actually good, obviously don't really compare with COD4 but still solid.

On 1up yours they said this game was actually good after countless crappy MoHs, I would like to see demo on MArketplace.

maybe I am just tired of WW2 lol

I'm sick of WWII FPSes too. But with that said I am totally wanting the next BiA game. With team tactics and a destructible cover system running on a non-shinny UE3 engine? I can get by with the WWII setting.

+good storytelling

it's graphic's.

well the new aspect of this game is that you can start from any part of the map.

like rob said, this one is different in that you are in the airborne, and you paradrop into every mission. you can literally start and go anywhere on any mission. brings alot of replayability.

not to mention that if youre doing good with a particular weapon, the weapon will level up over time.

Enough with WW-games. BIA:HH is more impressive with the thirdperson view and ability to control the squad team. That gives the player a big responsibility how the game will develop. The graphics looks better on BIA also. Shadowing and dynamics are really impressive from what I've seen so far in the gameplayvideos.
I've been a fan of MoH in the past times but MoH:Airborne doesn't deliver the goods as I was expecting and I can remind you that this title has been active since last year. No thanks this time !

They showed some gameplay on g4 last week and looked guite impressive in motion.


I think BIA looks like trash to be honest. The FPS view sucks, the third person view is great but I dont need cover in every single game and its the same as the last BIAs. This MOH is new and brings a new twist that you can start literally anywhere and that is pretty awesome.

You ! Here ! En garde !