Advertising
| X360, PS3 Thursday, August 9, 2007 | 1:49 AM

Xbox 360 & PS3 images of Timeshift

Xbox 360 & PS3 images of Timeshift

Vivendi Games had the very strange idea of releasing two bunchs of TimeShift screenshots, one from the Xbox 360 build and the other from the PS3 build. We count on you to find differences between the two (invent them if you don't, we won't mind).


All comments

Commented on 2007-08-09 03:24:17
pic 9 on the 360 looks ugly is all i could say. after that. ehh, same stuff
Commented on 2007-08-09 03:31:58
for me all the pics looks the same.
Commented on 2007-08-09 03:43:31
From these screens I think the ps3 version looks better, but at the same time I think some of the ps3 screens are more interesting than the 360 ones.
Commented on 2007-08-09 03:47:51
I dunno know what looks better than what, would be more interesting if they both showed the same scene.
Commented on 2007-08-09 03:49:57
there is no significant difference between the two versions
Commented on 2007-08-09 05:28:36
Posted by threesixty
pic 9 on the 360 looks ugly is all i could say. after that. ehh, same stuff
Holy sh#*! That guy's fingers are GINORMOUS!!!
Commented on 2007-08-09 05:52:35
I don't see any HDR in either version. In general this game looks horrible.
Commented on 2007-08-09 05:53:05
Looks better on PS3 in my book and also i love the Sixaxis alot more for a console FPS.
Commented on 2007-08-09 05:54:49
Yeah, I'm not seeing any major differences either. The blood splatter in PS3 image 9 looks really nice.
Commented on 2007-08-09 06:29:27
this game is so old it looks pretty crappy in both versions.
Commented on 2007-08-09 08:43:31
Graphicswise the main difference between these two versions seems to be that depth of field kicks in earlier in the PS3 version. Backgrounds become blurry far earlier. Best example of this is found on both versions first pic, since the picture of the environment and situation is taken from nearly same point. But the same thing applies to the other pictures as well. Other than that, it seems to be pretty much even-steven.
Commented on 2007-08-09 09:43:15
This message is in "Boulet Time" (TM), If you still *really* want to see it, click here

Commented on 2007-08-09 09:59:59
no differences at all, only the fact that whoever took the 360 screenshots, is a bit retarded, since theyre so awful and dull
Commented on 2007-08-09 10:23:33
They're the same - bland and uninteresting.
Commented on 2007-08-09 12:52:36
This message is in "Boulet Time" (TM), If you still *really* want to see it, click here

Commented on 2007-08-09 12:55:03
I could play this game last week in Valencia´s Campus Party (7000 people lan party) in EA stand and can tell that they could work a little beat in the character´s movement and playability. There´s something about this game that I don´t like :/
Commented on 2007-08-09 12:59:19
both identical, but i kinda like the forced depth of field on the ps3 more then the 360, completely unrealistic, but better from an artistic standpoint. i like the look of it tho, looks way better then fear (which i compare it to most) but will it be good enough to play and compete against the big boys in the genre? we'll soon see i guess.
Commented on 2007-08-09 13:36:33
I think both look equally horrible :P. I don't know what it is. The textures are nice, the shadows are nice, it just seems like everything has a lower poly count then it should at this stage. I'm sure some of you graphics terminology junkies out there would know a better way to put it.
Commented on 2007-08-09 13:38:39
Posted by GrimThorne
there is no significant difference between the two versions
Yes there is two months is the difference (in release dates)
Commented on 2007-08-09 14:30:40
they showed the worst pics for 360, they really try hard to find blurry pics; we need to see this on gameplay level anyway
Commented on 2007-08-09 23:37:08
Cant see any difference to speak of, and since the scenes are not from the same frames/timestamp comparisons either way are baseless.

But what I do see is downscaled supersampling, so both sets of pics look far better than the game actually will.

About the game


Advertising
What's up?
  • IRAIPT0IR
    IRAIPT0IR Funny you said that because I just finished what I had to do today and I have the rest of the day to chill and relax and surf the net,sad I have to be here and not in my home =( (37 minutes ago)
  • Phaethon360
    Phaethon360 Been so busy lately, now I can relax. (43 minutes ago)
  • Frozpot
    Frozpot @Doom_Bringer: Thanks for the Shattered Horizon Pass. It was interesting, even though they could have done much more with the graphics... (1 Hour ago)
  • IRAIPT0IR
    IRAIPT0IR Agreed,in this one I wanted more with each mission and all were different unlike AC that I was bored in the first hour :O (3 Hours ago)
  • SimonM7
    SimonM7 Yeah it's brilliant. I wouldn't say it's nothing like AC1, but AC1 just seems like a bizarrely long, super early demo of 2. (3 Hours ago)
  • IRAIPT0IR
    IRAIPT0IR No,the feeling not the taste XD....I played AC2 yesterday and it was awesome indeed,its hard to believe that the same team made AC1 its nothing like it. (3 Hours ago)
  • SimonM7
    SimonM7 If your first college girl tasted like coffee, then no, that wasn't her mouth. (3 Hours ago)
PreviousNext
Top stories