About the game
- Uncharted: Drake's Fortune
- PS3
- Published by Sony Computer En...
- French release: Available
Top stories
About
- Copyright 2007-2009 Gamersyde SARL
Log in
Express links
- Royal Navy to use PSPs for engineering training
- Yoko Ono infects The Beatles: Rock Band
- Church attacks Resident Evil, Capcom fights back
- Word of mouth is more important to consumers than reviews
- Square Enix providing Deus Ex 3 cinematics
- Contra on NES remade in Half-Life 2
- Dead Space 2?
- Crysis is back to the future
- Bioshock cosplay in real condition
- 10 minutes of Bad Company 2 beta
- Happy 4th birthday, Xbox 360
- Uwe Boll: Bloodrayne 3: shooting in january...
- Revelation of Infinty ward about the Airport level from Modern Warfare 2
- Mysterious new 2K games
- Police: yes kid, parents can take your Xbox
Popular games
All comments
Page 1 2 3 >>For me, Tomb Raider: Anniversary is the choice, even though it doesn't look half as good.
Lara on PS2 animated mush better in gameplay and characters in MGS3 animated mush better in cut scenes on PS2 too
all this talks about with PS3 we can do true next gen animations is stupid, Drake animation is very strange.
imho
But I loveTombRaider clones
+1
Lara on PS2 animated mush better in gameplay and characters in MGS3 animated mush better in cut scenes on PS2 too
all this talks about with PS3 we can do true next gen animations is stupid, Drake animation is very strange.
imho
But I loveTombRaider clones
and you are even "MUSH" more strange :D:D:D:
http://forums.gamemag.ru/images/smiles/em26.gif
eeh. I know. my English is suxxxx
and just as a side note, ACEfromrussia...you think lara animated better then drake in gameplay....are you blind perchance?
ACE
you think lara animated better then drake in gameplay....
are you blind perchance?
2)No, Why do you think so?
http://forums.gamemag.ru/images/smiles/em33.gif
1)Yes, much better
2)No, Why do you think so?
http://forums.gamemag.ru/images/smiles/em33.gif
Looks great but I would rather Naughty Dog used their talents on something other than a Tomb Raider clone thats going to get overlooked by anyone that doesn't own a PS3. What they need to be doing is creating a system selling game that can be developed into a franchaise unlike this game that looks like a one off...
i just find it truley laughable that anyone would think that laras robotic animations are better then drakes far more life like animations...but hey, to each his own.
i dont get whole PS3 superiority they speak about this game and how the ps3 allows dynamic animations and stuff,
So ridiculous
this is one of the best looking console games to date.
but animation is not very well
Man, may be Drake's animation is far more technologyan or something, but he moves like jerk
WTF, "technologyan"?! Looks like you're just making up words in order to kill hype on this game.
some of you guys are crazy. this is one of the best looking console games to date.
OMFG! Do you run your posts through Babelfish or something?!
WTF, "technologyan"?! Looks like you're just making up words in order to kill hype on this game.
Look at about 00:50 in, it looks wonky.
Look at about 00:50 in, it looks wonky.
Fifty seconds in, they're showing a wireframe/debug mode. Uh, I wouldn't expect the animation to look spot on there...
:|
Fifty seconds in, they're showing a wireframe/debug mode. Uh, I wouldn't expect the animation to look spot on there...
Also, if it does not work correctly in a TEST ENVIRONMENT how the feck is it going to work in-game? :P
He does move like jerk some times. I mean, seriously, i think the animations are good overall but when he's running and climbing small objects or making small jumps it looks like he's running on thin air. What a jerk! Floating around like that!
Look at about 00:50 in, it looks wonky.
This gen I want characters with actual character, not ultra pretty planks of wood, which is what the likes of marcus fenix pretty much amount to.