Xbox 360 PS3

As promised by Rockstar, the official website for Grand Theft Auto IV (PS3, X360) has been updated with new screenshots that you can see right here. Come back to see us next week for the final trailer. Only left is a month between now and the release, so hang on!

18 Images

  • GTAIV screens - 18 Images
  • GTAIV screens - 18 Images
  • GTAIV screens - 18 Images
  • GTAIV screens - 18 Images
  • GTAIV screens - 18 Images
  • GTAIV screens - 18 Images
  • GTAIV screens - 18 Images
  • GTAIV screens - 18 Images
  • GTAIV screens - 18 Images
  • GTAIV screens - 18 Images
  • GTAIV screens - 18 Images
  • GTAIV screens - 18 Images
  • GTAIV screens - 18 Images
  • GTAIV screens - 18 Images
  • GTAIV screens - 18 Images
  • GTAIV screens - 18 Images
  • GTAIV screens - 18 Images
  • GTAIV screens - 18 Images
Redneck
Redneck
Commented on 2008-03-21 14:06:01
I want to see it in motion!

I can't imagine how this pixelish distance-textures will look when moving.

BTW, In my opinipn the game looks like knotted on carpet.
In reply to
Slabs
Slabs
Commented on 2008-03-21 14:07:13
Good lord, people need to go back and take a look at where the GTA games of the past generation stood in terms of graphical prowess. It certainly wasn't near the top.
In reply to
Krilekk
Krilekk
Commented on 2008-03-21 14:41:49 In reply to pythxvii
Posted by pythxvii
Well I'm pretty sure GTA has a much bigger map, with higher distances etc... And it has style, which is more then SR's bland look. Sure the graphics are for the ost part terrible, but if it plays smoothly and is fun then as long as it looks reasonably decent (and it does, especially the water) then thats good enough.
It has already been confirmed that GTA IV is actually smaller than SR.
In reply to
Jigen
Jigen
Commented on 2008-03-21 15:47:54 In reply to Contra
Fairly ugly in screens, but this game WILL be doing a lot of things that no other game has done before. As I've said other times this came up, to me I can't look at any of these shots and even compare them to most other games, I know too much about the context of how these graphics are going to be presented. So it doesn't look bad to me. But if you took a single frame from a lot of other games and compared it to this one without any context then the other game would usually look better...
Posted by Contra
Get the PC version(Of course it is going to come out so don't ask).
I wouldn't assume anything. GTA SA made a fair amount on PC, but of course cost Take Two over a billion dollars (because of the problems that came out). Those were PS2 games though, and things HAVE changed quite a bit since then. Porting this game is going to be more expensive, while the market has shrunk.

We'll see anyways...
In reply to
daikide
daikide
Commented on 2008-03-21 16:14:58
The comparsions to Saints Row are stupid. This game aims for MUCH MORE!!!1

Also I would love to know which version's pics are we feeded now... 360?!
In reply to
Chrislox
Chrislox
Commented on 2008-03-21 16:23:16
I really don't think it is possible to judge the quality of the graphics based on screenshots. Sure Gears look a lot better, but Gears is a linear game and you have allmost no effect on your surroundings. GTA IV will be different! And who knows anything about the framerate? Have we even seen in-game footage? (No, sadly)
So what about waiting a month before slaugthering the game?
In reply to
Ashe
Ashe
Commented on 2008-03-21 16:50:27 In reply to LEBATO
Posted by LEBATO
Graphics are pretty bad. This is something Rockstar will simply not get, ever. Would you please take a look at the last shot? Damn that's awful.

Saint's Row has much better textures, lighting, and shadows......difference is pretty damn big.

And if you are going to reply with "SR sucks!", "it's all about the gameplay".....That's not the point, don't bother.
Well, I think that it's you who is missing the point. Textures, lighting, shadows etc. are not, what makes great graphics. Artistic direction counts more than that. And on that area GTA IV beats SR and the upcoming SR2 hands down. There isn't even a real contest about that. GTA:s have always had the right feeling and atmosphere in abundance. Something that SR didn't have. Graphical trickery is just icing on the cake, althought I'm sold for the euphoria based animation system.
In reply to
blmbox
blmbox
Commented on 2008-03-21 16:51:06
People seem to forget that we've seen this game (all be it vaguely) in motion and know that it looks good, arguably great in fact.

I personally can't wait. This and Viking: Battle for Asgard for the next couple of months, sorted!
In reply to
Viginti_Tres
Viginti_Tres
Commented on 2008-03-21 18:50:18 In reply to Sheps
Posted by Sheps
So ugly but so beautiful...

Attack of the vampires btw...... its the vampires with no shadows right?
No you can't see a vampire in a mirror. Etirely diffrent thing. ;)
In reply to
Moonwalker
Moonwalker
Commented on 2008-03-22 00:50:50 In reply to LEBATO
Posted by LEBATO
Graphics are pretty bad. This is something Rockstar will simply not get, ever. Would you please take a look at the last shot? Damn that's awful.

Saint's Row has much better textures, lighting, and shadows......difference is pretty damn big.

And if you are going to reply with "SR sucks!", "it's all about the gameplay".....That's not the point, don't bother.
When will we ALL finally understand that screenshots NEVER do any game justice? The pics look great when you see the small versions of them, when you enlarge them though they lookblurry and low res as hell. BUT, have you forgotten how awesome the graphics look in the trailers? It's THOSE graphics that you are gonna see when you are playing the game.

Do you not know about all the previews from magazines and sites that stated that while they played the game they thought the graphics was one of the best graphics in todays games...not just for a GTA game, but for games in general.

Do you honestly think the characters will look that low res and blurry? Like i said..go watch those trailers again , and then come tell me Saints Row looks better......for real.

Take this for example



Looks pretty nice, right?

The high res version is all the sudden much uglier

http://www.rockstargames.com/IV/screens/100.jpg


It's crazy that some people still fall for screenshots..i mean...you think those trailers of IV weren't in-engine? It's what the game looks like. The reason why these pics look so ugly in high res...that the image was originally captured as a smaller image. And you know what happens when you try to make small images bigger.. they get all pixelated
In reply to
Getpwned
Getpwned
Commented on 2008-03-22 01:00:49 In reply to LEBATO
Posted by LEBATO
Graphics are pretty bad. This is something Rockstar will simply not get, ever. Would you please take a look at the last shot? Damn that's awful.

Saint's Row has much better textures, lighting, and shadows......difference is pretty damn big.

And if you are going to reply with "SR sucks!", "it's all about the gameplay".....That's not the point, don't bother.
lol. QFT.
In reply to
Moonwalker
Moonwalker
Commented on 2008-03-22 01:08:10 In reply to Getpwned
Posted by Getpwned
lol. QFT.
There;s actually nothing true about it. Watch the goddamn GTA IV trailers and then come back and say Saints Row looks better in those aspects...recently i fired up SR...man...if you think that looks better,....get new glasses or eyes.
In reply to
Moonwalker
Moonwalker
Commented on 2008-03-22 01:15:11 In reply to Moonwalker


Looks nice, right?



Still so nice?


Tell me, which looks better?





Lets talk about lighting and shadows...hmm....you dont see any character shadows in that Saints pic...you do see it in the gta pic. need i go on? Watch the trailers.


check this

http://xbox360.ign.com/dor/grand-theft-auto-iv/827...

looks very nice..click it to see the full pic and see how ugly all the sudden the car looks?
In reply to
squarejawhero
squarejawhero
Commented on 2008-03-22 10:41:53
Ashe is correct. Good to read some people who actually take time to appreciate what GTAIV is doing, what it's about, instead of complaining how little it looks like the nearest shiny shiny FPS. GTAIV is about wealth of detail over graphical fidelity and the cartoonish design is purposeful to making sure that the violence isn't too realistic to be able to sell it.

Sure they could make it look realistic - but at what cost to the gameplay, the world? And to the possibility of releasing the damn thing? Come on, people, screw the ol' noggins on straight and think realistically. Naturally this isn't going to be on a par technically with games that put their processing power straight into the nearest graphical effects to hide bad design. But look at the clarity of what's being presented and bear in mind what's going on behind the scenes... it becomes very hard to make any legitimate complaints.
In reply to
macphisto80
macphisto80
Commented on 2008-03-23 06:19:23 In reply to LEBATO
This message is in "Boulet Time" (TM), If you still *really* want to see it, click here
Posted by LEBATO
Graphics are pretty bad. This is something Rockstar will simply not get, ever. Would you please take a look at the last shot? Damn that's awful.

Saint's Row has much better textures, lighting, and shadows......difference is pretty damn big.

And if you are going to reply with "SR sucks!", "it's all about the gameplay".....That's not the point, don't bother.
SR textures and lighting are better? Get your eyes tested. Oh, and wait for the fucking game to come out first before you talk this amount of shit.
Sheps
Sheps
Commented on 2008-03-23 14:33:17
Oh my Jesus bloody Christ would you people STOP comparing SR to GTA, especially on graphics, SR was a damn near launch title, of course GTA is going to look bloody better.

Get over it for Christ sake. At the end of the day GTA looks weird in screenshots, theres no denying it, it looks distorted and warped to say the least with a weird.

And all kids saying "SR isn't as good as GTA" and "GTA has better graphics" do what you preach and hush making comments until GTA has come out.

This whole discussion is self masturbation.
In reply to
About the game
Platform
PC X360 PS3
Published by
Rockstar Games
Developed by
Rockstar Games
Patreon

$135 of $400 per month

What's up?
  • Loakum

    Loakum Ugh….scratch that previous comment. The upcoming Game of Thrones video game is a F’in mobile phone game. Why can’t they came an open world GoT game, like Witcher 3 or God of War? (> 3 Months ago)

  • Loakum

    Loakum By FAR, the upcoming Game of Thrones King’s Road was the Game of the Show! It plays like God of War Ragnarok! :) (> 3 Months ago)

  • Loakum

    Loakum @Driftwood Awesome! I’m loving it! It does show a much crisper picture and the frame rate looks good! I was playing Stella Blade and Dragonball Soarkling Blast! :) (> 3 Months ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood @Loakum: enjoy, the one Sony sent us will be there on launch day. Coverage will follow asap. (> 3 Months ago)

  • Loakum

    Loakum *takes a large sip of victorious grape juice* ok….my PS5 pro arrived early! So much winning! :) (> 3 Months ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood @reneyvane: non ils l'ont publié le 1er octobre et je crois que tu l'avais déjà linkée. ;) (> 3 Months ago)

  • reneyvane

    reneyvane Factornews à joué à KingdomComeDeliverance2 au Gamescom 2024 mais ne publie sa preview que maintenant ? [url] (> 3 Months ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood Download is now functional again on Gamersyde. Sorry for the past 53 days or so when it wasn't. (> 3 Months ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood Another (French) livestream today at 2:30 CEST but you're welcome to drop by and speak English. I will gladly answer in English when I get a chance to catch a breath. :) (> 3 Months ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood GSY is getting some nice content at 3 pm CEST with our July podcast and some videos of the Deus Ex Mankind Divided preview build. :) (> 3 Months ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood For once we'll be live at 4:30 pm CEST. Blim should not even be tired! (> 3 Months ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood More Quantum Break coverage coming in a few hours, 9:00 a.m CEST. (> 3 Months ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood We'll have a full review up for Firewatch at 7 pm CET. Videos will only be tomorrow though. (> 3 Months ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood Tonight's livestream will be at 9:15 GMT+1, not GMT+2 as first stated. (> 3 Months ago)

Also on Gamersyde

SnowRunner now on Switch 2

  • Saturday, June 13, 2026
  • Driftwood

Our Switch 2 video of Final Fantasy VII Rebirth

  • Thursday, June 11, 2026
  • davton

Our video of NODE

  • Thursday, June 11, 2026
  • Driftwood