You certainly have noticed that we've been having some rather big bandwidth issues lately, forcing us to deactivate part of our streaming system while looking for a solution. Well, we have part of this solution ready, but now we need you to fine tune it!
It's very easy, all you have to do is try downloading for at least 30 seconds the file from each of these three servers, and then report the speed you got in the news comments. It's *very* important that you do not use a download manager (or that you use only one thread) for this test to be worthwhile!
Thanks for your help!
All comments (88)
Commented on 2008-04-18 01:39:081 - 382 kb/s
2 - 420 kb/s
3 - 20 kb/s
Commented on 2008-04-18 01:58:04These are all averages. (no huge up and downs noticed)
1. ~580 KB/s
2. ~260 KB/s
3. ~9 KB/s (lol)
Commented on 2008-04-18 02:24:021. ~290 KB/s
2. ~240 KB/s
3. ~275 KB/s
Commented on 2008-04-18 03:05:231. 320 kbps
2. 390 kbps
3.430 kbps
Each download would jump up and down though from 200 back up to its peak
Commented on 2008-04-18 03:08:21 In reply to Eddy1861. ~290 KB/s
2. ~240 KB/s
3. ~275 KB/s
Commented on 2008-04-18 03:19:16#2: 93-107KB/s
#3: 2-256KB/s Average Speed 50.90 KB/s Very unstable
Country: China
Connection: CNC 10mbit
Download Manager:FlashGet(one thread only)
Good luck
Commented on 2008-04-18 03:23:181: 10kbps
2: 100kbps
3: 139kbps
Commented on 2008-04-18 03:24:39#1: 5000kB/s (5MB/s)
#2: 400kB/s (0.4MB/s)
#3: 10000kB/s (10MB/s)
From Lund (southern part of Sweden) (ISP: Adamo / RixPort80 - 100/100):
#1: 4000kB/s (4MB/s)
#2: 320kB/s (0.32MB/s)
#3: 4000kB/s (4MB/s)
From Stockholm (ISP: Bredbandsbolaget - 100/10):
#1: 1200kB/s (1.2MB/s)
#2: 300kB/s
#3: 1920kB/s (1.92MB/s)
Commented on 2008-04-18 06:18:16Server2: 100 Kb/Seg
Server3: 120 Kb/Seg
I hope Im helping =)
Commented on 2008-04-18 06:33:12#1 = 850 KB/sec
#2 = 200 KB/sec
#3 = 850 KB/sec
Commented on 2008-04-18 06:45:35Server 1: 3007 kb/s
Server 2: 280 kb/s
Server 3: 2137 kb/s
Commented on 2008-04-18 07:30:121 845 kb sec
2 274 kb sec
3 848 kb sec
Commented on 2008-04-18 07:39:45#1 - 660 kb/s
#2 - 660 kb/s
#3 - 660 kb/s
6 MB Cable connection.
Commented on 2008-04-18 07:43:17#1 : between 250-320Kb/sec (for this city that's really good!)
#2 : beween 5-6kb/sec (very slow, even for China)
#3 :between 4-8kb/sec (very slow, even for China)
Downloading from western sites usually goes at around 100Kb/sec so server one is unusually good for me. You can definitely keep that one :P
Commented on 2008-04-18 07:46:15server
1 - 200kb
2 - 150kb
3 - 120kb
Commented on 2008-04-18 07:51:38 In reply to dzuser1- average 236
2 - " 180
3 - " 240
Commented on 2008-04-18 08:27:12#1 ~240 kb/s
#2 ~250 kb/s
#3 ~240 kb/s
Connection 2 Mb
Commented on 2008-04-18 08:57:03#1 ~210 KB/Sec
#2 ~211 KB/Sec
#3 ~207 KB/Sec
Connection 2 Mb
Commented on 2008-04-18 09:01:04Server 1, 200 -240 kbps (basically maxed out, with a few dips).
Server 2, 110 kbps.
Server 3, 220 kbps.
Commented on 2008-04-18 09:02:15server2 : 375 kbps
server3 : 3520 kbps
Location : Holland
Commented on 2008-04-18 09:13:122 - 176kbps
3 - 172kbps
from the uk running on a 3MB connection :(
Commented on 2008-04-18 09:15:05Server 1: 250 KB/s
Server 2: 300 KB/s
Server 3: 250 KB/s
Commented on 2008-04-18 10:20:47Server 1: 4,54MB/s
Server 2: 380KB/s
Server 3: 7,85MB/s
I'll try from my homeconnection (24Mbit FtH) later tonight.. ;)
Commented on 2008-04-18 10:22:18Server 1: 1.3MB/s
Server 2: 300KB/s
Server 3: 1.0MB/s
Commented on 2008-04-18 10:35:07#2: 250kb/s
#3: 300kb/s
Downloaded in Arnhem (Netherlands)