All comments

Is it just me or does it look better than the before screens?

Compared to screen 5 of ps3 and screen 6 of 360s.. the ps3 seems to show more colour..

They look identical, and that's great, because the game itself looks atrocious.

Ive seen some gameplay videos, and Conan seems way too agile in this game. He's like doing flips and stuff, just seems inappropriate.

poor man's god of war. This game is a bad rip off of GoW

I think you've got those backwards...

I agree the 360 one looks like it has more color.

THe xbox 360 ver has alot more bump mapping 4 sure

as 4 anything else well they look the same after all its the same game

looks like there are way more jaggies in the 360 version than the PS3. also the textures look pretty weak in both versions, maybe the 360 suffers from the multi-console design of the game, because in other games 360 almost every time has slightly better textures.

anyhow: gotta see it in motion to really judge it. looks like fun nonetheless...

there's no denying that this is a complete rip off of GoW, and I used to have no hope for this game, but it is looking slightly better now, and the latest E3 videos were alright.. at least the gameplay looks like it *might* be fun.

Jaggies for all I'm afraid. I would have been happy if they modelled Conan on Arnie, otherwise just another generic barbarian... hang on...

:o)

Well, I'm surprised how this game changed. Hm, it quite awakes my interests. I'm a big fan of the first movie with Arnie... so, thematically this game is hot. Well, I don't think you should compare this with god of war. It's an hack 'n slash... what do you expect?? thinking that way you could also say GOW is a ripp off of DMC!!!!
Both versions look quite good, 360 has more details and textures, but think in motion you won't see any difference. I'm really looking forward for this barbarian adventure. Quite cool that mammoth monster!!!

Mark of Kri anyone ?

Unfortunatly never played Kri, but the look is quite similar yeah. Kri was more Comic orientated... but quite brutal when I remember good. Hm... that's a game I'm quite sad I never had it ^^
But why does every body want to compare this game (Conan) with others... ??

of course theres jaggies, these are screenshots, theres no FSAA applied unless its photoshopped in afterwards, sheesh -_-

Im not trying to compare it to anything. Its fighting system that reminds me of Mark of Kri ( which was awesome ) but its a good thing. Both games have a lot in common. Weapon system, counter attacks, BLOOD etc etc. I really miss good hack'n slash games placed in dark fantasy universes so I keep my thumbs up.

Ah, now, that's declaration ^^
really wasn't able to define what you wanted to tell us ^^
Yeah, you're shurely right, can't really admit 'caus never played Mark of Kri...
But Conan really seems to get some fun... well, it has however hard competition!! (Heavenly sword)
Hmm, a demo would be nice!

I dont think its trying to compete with Heavenly Sword, it'd be stupid. Heavenly sword is supposed to be bigass, killer game and maybe even a system seller for some ppl. Just let Conan be nice and bloody pleasure as it should be :p

Cheers

Yepp, I agree totally, but what I wanted to say is:
I think, I can talk for almost everybody; you want a new game, go to the store, and see 2 new games in quite the same stile. The first is Heavenly sword, the other is Conan. What do you think most people would buy ^^

I'd get both but first play would be HS :p

Yeah, a demo would be nice.
Hm, not everybody can afford two games. ^^
Is there already a release date set for this game??

Every time I see the name "Conan" I think of a red-headed Irish dork. Sorry, no sale! I'll be too busy with Heavenly Sword, anyway.

Conan just looks boring and uninspired if you ask me...

who's that chick on the first screen for x360?