I mean - bad lighting and so on - you can argument "but it has a lot of action on screen going on" - well, okay. But thats not an excuse for those wrong-mapped textures etc.
Stupid thing to say. It's a 60FPS, fast paced game with lots of stuff going on to boot. For it to look this crisp is a feat in itself. Looks a lot better in motion than in screenshots I suppose, nice lighting effects in the trailer.
Yeah it was around Crackdown 2's level, graphically, when it was announced. Then again this is 60fps and has a lot more going on than C2 so this is a big step up from that technically. Seems to be a lot of fun too :) Probably worth a buy.
Commented on 2011-06-17 21:39:14 In reply to Mac1988
Posted by Mac1988
It looks like a PS2-title ... Really ...
I mean - bad lighting and so on - you can argument "but it has a lot of action on screen going on" - well, okay. But thats not an excuse for those wrong-mapped textures etc.
You need to get your eyes checked out, PS2 was a great console with great and advanced graphics for its time, the trailer clearly shows most of the check list features expected of the current gen withing the realm that this is a game where there is alot of multiplayer chaos going on between what seems like more than 16 players online on a map, not the 6 versus 6 you are used to on Call of Duty.
Commented on 2011-06-19 21:32:07 In reply to PlumbDrumb
Posted by PlumbDrumb
dude, stop with the eyes checked thing.
if not I'll just hit the ban button.
Mac1988 made use of the PS2 as a way to imply that somehow in 2011, FIVE years after the PS3 was launched in 2006 that this game still "looks" like a PS2 game against the images and video evidence.
Why do we have to go online to read such bunk and not see that properly addressed, why do we have to read somebody's opinion of using the PS2 like its a dirty word?
There is no secret that PS2 was designed to battle the not so secret and leaky Sega console projects and whatever Nintendo was going to make way back in 1998 and 1999. Specially considering it was no secret that hardware was pretty much final back in 1999 and Sony was waiting for a engineering process die shrink from .250nm to .180nm
Twisted Metal PS2 version exists, there are plenty of screenshot images online, why does someone have to use the "visual" trick to imply that we are also blind to not believe his posted message?
Driftwood
Download is now functional again on Gamersyde. Sorry for the past 53 days or so when it wasn't. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
Another (French) livestream today at 2:30 CEST but you're welcome to drop by and speak English. I will gladly answer in English when I get a chance to catch a breath. :) (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
GSY is getting some nice content at 3 pm CEST with our July podcast and some videos of the Deus Ex Mankind Divided preview build. :) (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
For once we'll be live at 4:30 pm CEST. Blim should not even be tired! (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
More Quantum Break coverage coming in a few hours, 9:00 a.m CEST. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
We'll have a full review up for Firewatch at 7 pm CET. Videos will only be tomorrow though. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
Tonight's livestream will be at 9:15 GMT+1, not GMT+2 as first stated. (> 3 Months ago)
Patreon
All comments (13)
Commented on 2011-06-16 23:04:40I mean - bad lighting and so on - you can argument "but it has a lot of action on screen going on" - well, okay. But thats not an excuse for those wrong-mapped textures etc.
Commented on 2011-06-17 00:17:11I wish MY PS2 games had looked this good.
Commented on 2011-06-17 00:35:22
Commented on 2011-06-17 00:42:08I think someone has forgotten what the ps2 era games looked like....
this game runs on the warhawk engine which is a solid engine for sure
Commented on 2011-06-17 00:54:36http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2011-twisted-metal/715428
Commented on 2011-06-17 00:57:27
Commented on 2011-06-17 03:03:47http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2011-twisted-metal/714905
The gfx have definitely been improved from last year.
Commented on 2011-06-17 03:54:11
Commented on 2011-06-17 14:22:06
Commented on 2011-06-17 17:26:34
Commented on 2011-06-17 21:39:14 In reply to Mac1988I mean - bad lighting and so on - you can argument "but it has a lot of action on screen going on" - well, okay. But thats not an excuse for those wrong-mapped textures etc.
Commented on 2011-06-17 22:00:48if not I'll just hit the ban button.
Commented on 2011-06-19 21:32:07 In reply to PlumbDrumbif not I'll just hit the ban button.
Why do we have to go online to read such bunk and not see that properly addressed, why do we have to read somebody's opinion of using the PS2 like its a dirty word?
There is no secret that PS2 was designed to battle the not so secret and leaky Sega console projects and whatever Nintendo was going to make way back in 1998 and 1999. Specially considering it was no secret that hardware was pretty much final back in 1999 and Sony was waiting for a engineering process die shrink from .250nm to .180nm
Twisted Metal PS2 version exists, there are plenty of screenshot images online, why does someone have to use the "visual" trick to imply that we are also blind to not believe his posted message?