All comments

Its out feb 14th :)

Nice info JonesCK1 I love reading this stuff.

Not out till the 10th of March here :( oh well

These look amaizing, by far the best looking human characters I have seen in any game..

DAMN! I cant wait to see EA NHL 2007 looking like this..

I got to ask you how did you fix your mouth to say that? In motion it looks just as good if not better so what are you even talking about? Its one think to hate on something, but its another thing to make it obvious by making comments like that and not making valid points.

Why are you even bothering to compare this to DOA4 the two games are completely different graphics styles. DOA4 isn't supposed to look realistic it's ment to look cartoony and larger then life! Which it does very darn well. Will people please stop comparing oranges to apples.

Seriously doa 4 wasn't meant to look as good as these boxers and you are talking about realistic flesh physics.... from e3 demo. So in other words ps3 fanboy.

http://media.ps3.ign.com/media/748/748455/img_3323...

If you compare this pic from the ps3 TECH demo to the 360 screens ... I'd say the 360 screens look far superior and the skin looks better. You are talking about plastic looking you have no idea what High dynamic range is do you? All the skin looks realistic if you've ever watched a boxing match the fighters are usually under alot of lights and you'll see that light reflecting off of them.

Nothing you saw in the ps3 version was actual gameplay... the developer couldn't control a single one of the fighters via that controller all he could do was pause rewind, let it play, and change camera angles nothing more. The videocard in both the ps3 and 360 are far superior to a radeon 9800 pro, and yet the radeon 9800 pro is still capable of running a real time demo of ruby and all of it looks better than anything we've yet to see from a videogame yet the 9800 pro isn't capable of handling anything like that in actual gameplay.

What you saw in that ps3 e3 fight night video was no different...

Good god... his face was massacred I was just taking notice.

Um those are definetly in-game graphics. I believe it's Unreal engine from what I read so far? Looks similar to Gears of War.

FNR3 graphics are looking stellar. Far better than anything I've seen so far. A sign of better things to come. Not sure if I dig the gameplay, I got bored after knocking out my opponent for the 10th time. But maybe because it's only a demo. I'd expect EA to be producing better quality games. Now give me a Halo screenshot. No that the one from DOA 4 LOL.

maybe xbox360 will be able to have gfx like that in a couple years, that would be awesome. But those pictures arent in-game, not even the unreal 3.0 engine looks like this:

http://gamereports.com/grimages/591/1137702519/3/1...

Its CGI, look at the shadows casted, look at the lighting, look at the lady's hair. This is in-game: http://img.gamespot.com/gamespot/images/2005/296/9...

Back to FN3, does anyone possibly know if this game uses more than 1 of the xbox360's processors?

its hilarious how 3 months ago you heard nothing but EA bashing on these boards, and now this game is around the corner and you don't hear anyone bashing EA ...

buncha hypocrites I tell ya ... lol

The colors, shadows, lighting on the new video of FN just don't seem as realistic as that e3 demo, skin and shadows looked way better in that demo or whatever you want to call it. But i guess it was just a fancy tech demo so now its been downgraded... still looks great though.

Oh btw, Ruby has to be the lamest demo i've ever seen.. maybe it was just the lazy character design that ruined it for me.

PS9DS you must be kidding...right the xbox360 version looks much better then that ps3 tech demo.!!

its was al justified this is the only true next gen game they have released so far the other where 1/2 hacks with lack of features

I don’t really like boxing games (or EA), but this game looks REALLY good.

Its all justified, i hate EA for the Madden and Live series, they've really slacked off the last 5 years by not really improving the game and not changing up stuff that really needs to cuz they know fanboys are going to buy it regardless, well i stop buy that shit after the 2004 version, i just let my brother buy it so i dont waste money on a roster updated game. Their basicly adding a couple of features each year most that has nothing to do with gameplay and put a new sticker date on it, basicly their just saving money. So ima stay on them about that till they produce something worth my $50, or in this case next gen $60. Im giving credit to EA chicago for their effort that they are obviously showing in the games that they make. But EA Tiburon and EA Canada, ima stay on them until they improve the Madden and Live series. Especially since i cant play NFL 2k anymore. Its a shame that EA Tiburon puts more effort into the NCAA football game(which is a hot game every year) than they put in Madden. I have a lot more stuff to complain about in relation to EA but i would have to pack a lunch cuz it would take all day to get everything down.

please learn the meaning of "hypocrite" before throwing the word around.

The only advantage the PS3 demo had was the animations, and that was because they were entirely scripted. The Xbox 360 game sports better skin textures, lighting, and just about everything else. And this is actual gameplay, not some scripted tech demo.

game look good.

and to the tech guys,can you guys break your post down to our language?n tell us which is better

LOL, I'm not a tech guy, but you can count on this. Xbox360=PS3.