Commented on 2006-01-20 13:28:10 In reply to PS9DS
Posted by PS9DS
Those images look great and all, but don't get your hopes up, in motion it looks very much like current gen. The realistic flesh physics of the e3 demo are missing, they look like they're made of plastic when a punch connects. Great graphics for 360 though, better than DOA4.
I got to ask you how did you fix your mouth to say that? In motion it looks just as good if not better so what are you even talking about? Its one think to hate on something, but its another thing to make it obvious by making comments like that and not making valid points.
Commented on 2006-01-20 13:49:45 In reply to PS9DS
Posted by PS9DS
Those images look great and all, but don't get your hopes up, in motion it looks very much like current gen. The realistic flesh physics of the e3 demo are missing, they look like they're made of plastic when a punch connects. Great graphics for 360 though, better than DOA4.
Why are you even bothering to compare this to DOA4 the two games are completely different graphics styles. DOA4 isn't supposed to look realistic it's ment to look cartoony and larger then life! Which it does very darn well. Will people please stop comparing oranges to apples.
Seriously doa 4 wasn't meant to look as good as these boxers and you are talking about realistic flesh physics.... from e3 demo. So in other words ps3 fanboy.
If you compare this pic from the ps3 TECH demo to the 360 screens ... I'd say the 360 screens look far superior and the skin looks better. You are talking about plastic looking you have no idea what High dynamic range is do you? All the skin looks realistic if you've ever watched a boxing match the fighters are usually under alot of lights and you'll see that light reflecting off of them.
Nothing you saw in the ps3 version was actual gameplay... the developer couldn't control a single one of the fighters via that controller all he could do was pause rewind, let it play, and change camera angles nothing more. The videocard in both the ps3 and 360 are far superior to a radeon 9800 pro, and yet the radeon 9800 pro is still capable of running a real time demo of ruby and all of it looks better than anything we've yet to see from a videogame yet the 9800 pro isn't capable of handling anything like that in actual gameplay.
What you saw in that ps3 e3 fight night video was no different...
Commented on 2006-01-20 15:33:02 In reply to CockKnocker
Posted by CockKnocker
Those definitley aren't in-game gfx if thats what you think...Those are just renders or something. Btw does anyone know exactly when Fight Night is out for 360? I've seen mixed dates, i just wanna be sure.
Um those are definetly in-game graphics. I believe it's Unreal engine from what I read so far? Looks similar to Gears of War.
FNR3 graphics are looking stellar. Far better than anything I've seen so far. A sign of better things to come. Not sure if I dig the gameplay, I got bored after knocking out my opponent for the 10th time. But maybe because it's only a demo. I'd expect EA to be producing better quality games. Now give me a Halo screenshot. No that the one from DOA 4 LOL.
Commented on 2006-01-20 15:50:58 In reply to Nossy
Posted by Nossy
Um those are definetly in-game graphics. I believe it's Unreal engine from what I read so far? Looks similar to Gears of War.
maybe xbox360 will be able to have gfx like that in a couple years, that would be awesome. But those pictures arent in-game, not even the unreal 3.0 engine looks like this:
its hilarious how 3 months ago you heard nothing but EA bashing on these boards, and now this game is around the corner and you don't hear anyone bashing EA ...
Commented on 2006-01-20 20:26:49 In reply to Optimusv2
Posted by Optimusv2
Seriously doa 4 wasn't meant to look as good as these boxers and you are talking about realistic flesh physics.... from e3 demo. So in other words ps3 fanboy.
If you compare this pic from the ps3 TECH demo to the 360 screens ... I'd say the 360 screens look far superior and the skin looks better. You are talking about plastic looking you have no idea what High dynamic range is do you? All the skin looks realistic if you've ever watched a boxing match the fighters are usually under alot of lights and you'll see that light reflecting off of them.
Nothing you saw in the ps3 version was actual gameplay... the developer couldn't control a single one of the fighters via that controller all he could do was pause rewind, let it play, and change camera angles nothing more. The videocard in both the ps3 and 360 are far superior to a radeon 9800 pro, and yet the radeon 9800 pro is still capable of running a real time demo of ruby and all of it looks better than anything we've yet to see from a videogame yet the 9800 pro isn't capable of handling anything like that in actual gameplay.
What you saw in that ps3 e3 fight night video was no different...
The colors, shadows, lighting on the new video of FN just don't seem as realistic as that e3 demo, skin and shadows looked way better in that demo or whatever you want to call it. But i guess it was just a fancy tech demo so now its been downgraded... still looks great though.
Oh btw, Ruby has to be the lamest demo i've ever seen.. maybe it was just the lazy character design that ruined it for me.
Commented on 2006-01-20 22:30:16 In reply to purbeast
Posted by purbeast
its hilarious how 3 months ago you heard nothing but EA bashing on these boards, and now this game is around the corner and you don't hear anyone bashing EA ...
buncha hypocrites I tell ya ... lol
its was al justified this is the only true next gen game they have released so far the other where 1/2 hacks with lack of features
Commented on 2006-01-21 02:55:03 In reply to purbeast
Posted by purbeast
its hilarious how 3 months ago you heard nothing but EA bashing on these boards, and now this game is around the corner and you don't hear anyone bashing EA ...
buncha hypocrites I tell ya ... lol
Its all justified, i hate EA for the Madden and Live series, they've really slacked off the last 5 years by not really improving the game and not changing up stuff that really needs to cuz they know fanboys are going to buy it regardless, well i stop buy that shit after the 2004 version, i just let my brother buy it so i dont waste money on a roster updated game. Their basicly adding a couple of features each year most that has nothing to do with gameplay and put a new sticker date on it, basicly their just saving money. So ima stay on them about that till they produce something worth my $50, or in this case next gen $60. Im giving credit to EA chicago for their effort that they are obviously showing in the games that they make. But EA Tiburon and EA Canada, ima stay on them until they improve the Madden and Live series. Especially since i cant play NFL 2k anymore. Its a shame that EA Tiburon puts more effort into the NCAA football game(which is a hot game every year) than they put in Madden. I have a lot more stuff to complain about in relation to EA but i would have to pack a lunch cuz it would take all day to get everything down.
Commented on 2006-01-21 03:54:13 In reply to PS9DS
Posted by PS9DS
The colors, shadows, lighting on the new video of FN just don't seem as realistic as that e3 demo, skin and shadows looked way better in that demo or whatever you want to call it. But i guess it was just a fancy tech demo so now its been downgraded... still looks great though.
Oh btw, Ruby has to be the lamest demo i've ever seen.. maybe it was just the lazy character design that ruined it for me.
The only advantage the PS3 demo had was the animations, and that was because they were entirely scripted. The Xbox 360 game sports better skin textures, lighting, and just about everything else. And this is actual gameplay, not some scripted tech demo.
Loakum
Ugh….scratch that previous comment. The upcoming Game of Thrones video game is a F’in mobile phone game. Why can’t they came an open world GoT game, like Witcher 3 or God of War? (> 3 Months ago)
Loakum
By FAR, the upcoming Game of Thrones King’s Road was the Game of the Show! It plays like God of War Ragnarok! :) (> 3 Months ago)
Loakum
@Driftwood Awesome! I’m loving it! It does show a much crisper picture and the frame rate looks good! I was playing Stella Blade and Dragonball Soarkling Blast! :) (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
@Loakum: enjoy, the one Sony sent us will be there on launch day. Coverage will follow asap. (> 3 Months ago)
Loakum
*takes a large sip of victorious grape juice* ok….my PS5 pro arrived early! So much winning! :) (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
@reneyvane: non ils l'ont publié le 1er octobre et je crois que tu l'avais déjà linkée. ;) (> 3 Months ago)
reneyvane
Factornews à joué à KingdomComeDeliverance2 au Gamescom 2024 mais ne publie sa preview que maintenant ? [url] (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
Download is now functional again on Gamersyde. Sorry for the past 53 days or so when it wasn't. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
Another (French) livestream today at 2:30 CEST but you're welcome to drop by and speak English. I will gladly answer in English when I get a chance to catch a breath. :) (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
GSY is getting some nice content at 3 pm CEST with our July podcast and some videos of the Deus Ex Mankind Divided preview build. :) (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
For once we'll be live at 4:30 pm CEST. Blim should not even be tired! (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
More Quantum Break coverage coming in a few hours, 9:00 a.m CEST. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
We'll have a full review up for Firewatch at 7 pm CET. Videos will only be tomorrow though. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
Tonight's livestream will be at 9:15 GMT+1, not GMT+2 as first stated. (> 3 Months ago)
Patreon
All comments (70)
Commented on 2006-01-20 08:46:35
Commented on 2006-01-20 08:54:46 In reply to JonesCK1
Commented on 2006-01-20 10:04:24
Commented on 2006-01-20 11:18:04DAMN! I cant wait to see EA NHL 2007 looking like this..
Commented on 2006-01-20 13:28:10 In reply to PS9DS
Commented on 2006-01-20 13:49:45 In reply to PS9DS
Commented on 2006-01-20 15:18:20http://media.ps3.ign.com/media/748/748455/img_3323...
If you compare this pic from the ps3 TECH demo to the 360 screens ... I'd say the 360 screens look far superior and the skin looks better. You are talking about plastic looking you have no idea what High dynamic range is do you? All the skin looks realistic if you've ever watched a boxing match the fighters are usually under alot of lights and you'll see that light reflecting off of them.
Nothing you saw in the ps3 version was actual gameplay... the developer couldn't control a single one of the fighters via that controller all he could do was pause rewind, let it play, and change camera angles nothing more. The videocard in both the ps3 and 360 are far superior to a radeon 9800 pro, and yet the radeon 9800 pro is still capable of running a real time demo of ruby and all of it looks better than anything we've yet to see from a videogame yet the 9800 pro isn't capable of handling anything like that in actual gameplay.
What you saw in that ps3 e3 fight night video was no different...
Commented on 2006-01-20 15:20:57 In reply to Critx
Commented on 2006-01-20 15:33:02 In reply to CockKnockerFNR3 graphics are looking stellar. Far better than anything I've seen so far. A sign of better things to come. Not sure if I dig the gameplay, I got bored after knocking out my opponent for the 10th time. But maybe because it's only a demo. I'd expect EA to be producing better quality games. Now give me a Halo screenshot. No that the one from DOA 4 LOL.
Commented on 2006-01-20 15:50:58 In reply to Nossyhttp://gamereports.com/grimages/591/1137702519/3/1...
Its CGI, look at the shadows casted, look at the lighting, look at the lady's hair. This is in-game: http://img.gamespot.com/gamespot/images/2005/296/9...
Back to FN3, does anyone possibly know if this game uses more than 1 of the xbox360's processors?
Commented on 2006-01-20 16:48:05buncha hypocrites I tell ya ... lol
Commented on 2006-01-20 20:26:49 In reply to Optimusv2http://media.ps3.ign.com/media/748/748455/img_3323...
If you compare this pic from the ps3 TECH demo to the 360 screens ... I'd say the 360 screens look far superior and the skin looks better. You are talking about plastic looking you have no idea what High dynamic range is do you? All the skin looks realistic if you've ever watched a boxing match the fighters are usually under alot of lights and you'll see that light reflecting off of them.
Nothing you saw in the ps3 version was actual gameplay... the developer couldn't control a single one of the fighters via that controller all he could do was pause rewind, let it play, and change camera angles nothing more. The videocard in both the ps3 and 360 are far superior to a radeon 9800 pro, and yet the radeon 9800 pro is still capable of running a real time demo of ruby and all of it looks better than anything we've yet to see from a videogame yet the 9800 pro isn't capable of handling anything like that in actual gameplay.
What you saw in that ps3 e3 fight night video was no different...
Oh btw, Ruby has to be the lamest demo i've ever seen.. maybe it was just the lazy character design that ruined it for me.
Commented on 2006-01-20 21:57:29
Commented on 2006-01-20 22:30:16 In reply to purbeastbuncha hypocrites I tell ya ... lol
Commented on 2006-01-21 02:01:56
Commented on 2006-01-21 02:55:03 In reply to purbeastbuncha hypocrites I tell ya ... lol
Commented on 2006-01-21 03:37:09
Commented on 2006-01-21 03:54:13 In reply to PS9DSOh btw, Ruby has to be the lamest demo i've ever seen.. maybe it was just the lazy character design that ruined it for me.
Commented on 2006-01-21 16:02:28and to the tech guys,can you guys break your post down to our language?n tell us which is better
Commented on 2006-01-21 17:07:34 In reply to ywjand to the tech guys,can you guys break your post down to our language?n tell us which is better