Advertising
| X360, PS3 Tuesday, May 8, 2007 | 7:57 PM

Army of Two images

Army of Two images

Army Of Two is back with these five new images. It certainly doesn't look bad, but somehow I was expecting something better.


All comments

Page 1 2 >>
Commented on 2007-05-08 21:06:17
oh, thats lovely!
Are there any screenshots in the part where they make love to each other?!
:yawn:
Commented on 2007-05-08 21:11:41
omg, what the hell is going on, they produce these beautiful looking movies and pictures, then the closer the games come to release the worser they look :S
Commented on 2007-05-08 21:12:23
What's the betting these 5 shots are recalled or deemed to be a mistake. It looks blumming terrible!
Commented on 2007-05-08 21:17:14
lol the screenshot debate happens on yet another game i swear they should ban screenshots they always end up worse then what you see with your own eyes when playing and seeing videos.
Commented on 2007-05-08 21:18:19
Posted by Sheps
omg, what the hell is going on, they produce these beautiful looking movies and pictures, then the closer the games come to release the worser they look :S
Welcome to EA's world .... They are one of the best publishers in terms of doctoring their announcement screenshots. just sit down and watch the same thing happen to all their games, Skate, Burnout ....
Commented on 2007-05-08 21:18:56
Err, the videos looked better.

The outdoor parts look quite boring and dull, tbh. Indoor is ok-ish, but nothing spectacular.
Commented on 2007-05-08 21:24:46
I guess the trademark of this gen is that games look worse and worse the longer they're in development.
Commented on 2007-05-08 21:32:03
http://kotaku.com/gaming/ea/ea-gears-of-war-zero-i...

NEVER FORGET!



anyway, I'm sure the game still looks fine in motion :P
Commented on 2007-05-08 21:32:47
First and second image looks great...and what the hell though, how many weapons can you carry :P
Commented on 2007-05-08 21:50:20
Looks good, but like all other games better in motion. That's one thing some people need to understand. This is the HD era after all. Until you see the animations and lighting in full effect you're probably not going to be very impressed by a bunch of stills.
Commented on 2007-05-08 21:53:11
Yeah synce is right, screenshots always sucks, what's best in HD it's a motion ;-)
Commented on 2007-05-08 22:04:03
Posted by synce
Looks good, but like all other games better in motion. That's one thing some people need to understand. This is the HD era after all. Until you see the animations and lighting in full effect you're probably not going to be very impressed by a bunch of stills.
wahooo finally someone here see sense i thought i was only one for a minute.
Commented on 2007-05-08 22:07:42
the landscape looks great, but the those models look terrible
Commented on 2007-05-08 22:13:45
even with them being stills they dont look good at all...as someone said the character models looks very bad
Commented on 2007-05-08 22:38:13
eeeew
Commented on 2007-05-08 22:44:14
If those videos that were released were in-game, then these screenshots look nothing like it. Those in-game graphics were just so damn impressive to see in motion. Or maybe EA even doctored their footage. Wouldn't be the first time, lol.
Commented on 2007-05-08 23:24:48
Posted by Sath
First and second image looks great...and what the hell though, how many weapons can you carry :P
im just glad their visible and dont look like you pull them out your ass like most games. im still looking forward to the game, but that does look like some serious downgrade in graphics. aliasing is horrible, and overall it looks like theres more poly's and detail in the main characters then all the environments combined, which is kinda lame since there isnt many poly's or detail in the main characters to begin with.

still, i like the prospect of running through a game with a friend, especially one that is so geared towards co-op as this.
Commented on 2007-05-08 23:37:00
Haha. I thought this game was supposed to stomp Gears of War visually.
Commented on 2007-05-08 23:43:12
Pff.. this still looks good imo :\. Just gotta keep in mind it's from EA and then it looks good.

edit: I laugh at EA.. look at the last pic, the light looks SO photoshopped. Also the beam of light coming from the house is photoshopped on, it's pasted on a piece of house.
Commented on 2007-05-09 00:12:55
It looks okay, but it also seems to be downgrade week for EA...
Commented on 2007-05-09 00:20:08
Damn people its not about graphics its about the gameplay. If i was playing a game that looked like this and had very fun gameplay i would still love it. The character models look excellent I think but the enviorment doesnt look that great. But in motion wen u have a bunch of guys shooting at you I dont think you will have time to look at a still picture.

What I am worried about the most is the games story and voice acting. EA has made some very crappy games but have made some good games. Like battlefield, that was a fun game and was one of my favorite military shooters. But it lacked story big time and the only voice acting you hear in it is the normal "roger" or "ok". This game obviously will have voice acting and a story, and I know EA sucks at that. I just hope they can make this game good, but seeing that one trailer with them trying to be funny was kind of annoying. I just hope this game turns out good.
Commented on 2007-05-09 01:45:57
So this is the game that talks smack about Gears. Haha.

Two year old PC BF2 looks better than this, and 1.5 year old PDZ stomps this with one, pink-nailed girly hand.
Commented on 2007-05-09 02:51:02
im gonna be the first to say it. i think these are ps3 shots. the overall brightness, the lack of any half decent lighting, the low res textures, these are all signs of a ps3 game. that combines with the STUNNING trailers we've seen. i dont belive EA would downgrade to such an extent. so im gonna go on record and say their ps3 shots and the 360 version will look better then this in every way.
Commented on 2007-05-09 06:17:18
Posted by KORNdog
im gonna be the first to say it. i think these are ps3 shots. the overall brightness, the lack of any half decent lighting, the low res textures, these are all signs of a ps3 game. that combines with the STUNNING trailers we've seen. i dont belive EA would downgrade to such an extent. so im gonna go on record and say their ps3 shots and the 360 version will look better then this in every way.
that's exceedingly harsh man.
Commented on 2007-05-09 09:47:42
Posted by mkk316
that's exceedingly harsh man.
yeah...but he's probably right.
Page 1 2 >>

About the game


Advertising
What's up?
  • dingleberry
    dingleberry Birmignham 2 shots on goal, 11 men behind the ball. Should have been about 6 - 2 to Liverpool. Rafa's going nowhere. (13 minutes ago)
  • Slabs
    Slabs @blmbox: Keep Rafa At Pool. Love him talking bollocks. Also refs are having too much influence on results, we need video refs ASAP, the time "lost" would be less than player protests now! (56 minutes ago)
  • blmbox
    blmbox I've got to say, it's funny to see Liverpool resorting to cheating in order to pick up a point against one of the league's lesser sides. Surely Rafa's days are numbered? (1 Hour ago)
  • Haig07
    Haig07 Well Flashforward was boring again. Is it a full season or is it a nice short 16 episode one? I can't be arsed watching any more :I (1 Hour ago)
  • GeRaLTo
    GeRaLTo @Baleur: dunno what easy is ... (1 Hour ago)
  • Frozpot
    Frozpot Broncos and Steelers. TONIGHT! :8... (1 Hour ago)
  • TheBeagle
    TheBeagle 2 hours! (1 Hour ago)
PreviousNext
Top stories