About the game
- Battlefield: Bad Company
- X360, PS3
- Published by Electronic Arts
- Developped by Digitals Illusio...
- French release: Available
Top stories
Popular articles
- A fresh pair and video from Forza 3
- Images of Two Worlds 2
- Gran Turismo PSP at 60fps
- New images of Red Dead Redemption
- Operation Flashpoint 2 out in the open
- Four more of Forza 3
- Batman asks for asylum
- E3: Parts of The Last Guardian trailer
- The first 10 minutes of Call of Juarez 2
- Guilty Gear 2 in September
About
- Copyright 2007-2009 Gamersyde SARL
Log in
Express links
- GTA IV: two multiplaform episodes in 2010 ?
- Xbox 360 has better progression than PS3 in the UK
- NBA 2k9 reaches 2 million sales worldwide
- Take-Two diversifying away from GTA dependence
- Tekken 6 director finds unlockables outdated
- IGDA found a new president, Della Rocca is out
- Midway-Warner sale: it's done
- 4-real-syde: Universal bought the rights for an Asteroids movie
- Next No More Heroes won't be a Wii game
- PSP Go! more than 40% faster than original
- Splinter Cell Conviction will last 12 hours
- Miyamoto doesn't think next Zelda will be ''that radically different'' from the previous ones
- A new Resident Evil movie on the works ?
- Valve still hates the Playstation 3
- Nerd-syde: Home-made Virtual-On controller for XBLA release








All comments
Page 1 2 >>Looks very good.. I hope it has MP though because a BF without MP is useless imho....
I hope it has MP though because a BF without MP is useless imho....
really looking forward to this one.
Looks really really great.
http://www.gamersyde.com/forum_8_22272_1_en.html
PS3 or 360 screenshots here being shown here or what?
Holy sh t. If these are all actually from gameplay, this may be the "Cleanest" looking game I have ever seen. I mean just look at the textures. Motion blur would only ruin this game.
They are notorious for putting out bullshots.
Sounds like it's not bullshots, besides AA
Looks very good.. I hope it has MP though because a BF without MP is useless imho....
It will have MP--but we need to stop pretending that it's not just Modern Combat 2. Not that there is anything wrong with that, as a lot of people really enjoyed MC.. but the game isn't the BF that many people know/love.
This is a LOT more than Modern Combat 2. This will be a REAL SP mode, not just playing against bots. Plus this adds a lot more features, like fully destructible environs...
This is a LOT more than Modern Combat 2. This will be a REAL SP mode, not just playing against bots. Plus this adds a lot more features, like fully destructible environs...
The class design is what concerns me most, not single player, or destructible walls and foliage.. and that is what essentially makes it the sequel to MC. There are stories and characters now? Okay, even less like the BF I love :P
I'm not saying it will be a bad game--or even that MC was a bad game. But as a fan of BF2, it's a little disappointing that they're taking the franchise in this direction instead of focusing on its core. DICE has let me down big time in post game support, and with 2142.. which also isn't a bad game but could have been so much more. I hope they're working on winning me back over with the inevitable BF3.
Looks alot better then cod4, cant wait Battlefield rocks!
Haha good joke! :)
It will have MP--but we need to stop pretending that it's not just Modern Combat 2. Not that there is anything wrong with that, as a lot of people really enjoyed MC.. but the game isn't the BF that many people know/love.
I'm really looking forward to this. I hope to get a deep multiplayer. As much as i am enjoying CoD4 Beta, it's still too run and frag, not much teamwork and strategy as good old BF2 (and 2142 of course).
If its not this one, hell then it will be TF2 (i already scrapped QW:ET from my list after playing the beta...)
number 2 and 6 o.O
But the gameplay will feel bland like Modern Combat... And that doesn't come close to the quality of BF2
The class design resembles MC, and that's what makes it MC2. Destructible environments aren't exactly a proven gameplay mechanic either.. nice idea, but how it actually impacts the game has yet to be seen.
The class design is what concerns me most, not single player, or destructible walls and foliage.. and that is what essentially makes it the sequel to MC. There are stories and characters now? Okay, even less like the BF I love :P
I'm not saying it will be a bad game--or even that MC was a bad game. But as a fan of BF2, it's a little disappointing that they're taking the franchise in this direction instead of focusing on its core. DICE has let me down big time in post game support, and with 2142.. which also isn't a bad game but could have been so much more. I hope they're working on winning me back over with the inevitable BF3.
Anyways, the 'main' Battlefield IP is one of multiplayer only, class based, with vehicles, crappy bots and horrible single player. MC was a 'real' Battlefield game, just not a very good one.
If anything, you should be upset that this is yet another game that takes an IP in a completely different direction, for the sake of sales alone (put a big name on a game). I think this one has lots of potential, but it will be very different from the 'real' Battlefield games.