:/

This is why this game isn't as good as other BF games, because it doesn't require you to work together with you teammates as much. You should absolutely have to rely on your team for resupply.

The game is good though, but I still find the performance pretty disappointing. I even turned down the settings and it still has that sorta slow sluggishness that it does with everything jacked up, so I don't really even know how to explain it. It's not terrible and I'm probably pulling more than 60 frames much of the time, but it's the lack of consistency that I think is getting to me. Going back to COD4 @ an almost steady 125fps feels ridiculously fluid by comparison.

I've heard people with GTX295's complaining. That should tell you something.

Does anyone know what last nights patch did?

Well it stopped the game from dumping you to desktop after every round, so that's nice at least.

Wow. That's horrible. That's on a fucking 4Ghz quad. Frostbite is garbage :(

No wonder this game runs so poorly on consoles, it runs poorly on everything. I fear for BF3 and Medal of Honor.

The fact that a 4GHz C2Q with the fastest GPU on the market is still averaging 30 fps with max details is pretty discouraging. I know I'm CPU limited, I can turn everything down and barely see a hint of improvement.

I just ran FRAPS and it's really not that bad. Most of the time it's hovering between 30-50fps.. but I'm spoiled with games like L4D and COD4, and I realize they're fairly low tech, but how do you go from 180fps almost solid to a 30 and not stable? It's so damn jarring. I go back to COD4 and everything feels stupid smooth by comparison. I would love it if they could tweak or optimize this engine to scale a little more respectably.

It's probably because you're CPU bottlenecked. Your processor can't push the game to the fullest ability of your GPU.I'm sorry, no. When the game only pulls an average of 33 fps with the fastest single GPU on the market on a 4Ghz Core 2 Quad, people have the right to be disappointed by its performance. Sure, maybe we've spoiled ourselves this generation with mutliplayer games that run at smooth, consistent framerates, but a lot of us gamers who play multiplayer FPS are willing to sacrifice eye candy for performance regardless. When the game runs like poo on relatively new rigs, even when you drop some of the settings down, it's just poo performance. It makes me worry about future games that run on the engine, but hopefully they can optimize it further.

I recognize the tech gap between these games, but it makes it harder to convince myself to play these games when there are alternatives that look nice and run excessively well. I think I'm still buying it though. I'm having fun despite all of the problems the game has. It is a totally ham-fisted Console port though, so Acert was right. DICE are just taking advantage of our emotions. They're no more dedicated to the platform than Infinity Ward, so they need to stop pretending or STFU.The destruction is cool.Those were never my only standards.

I'd be at least a little worried. I don't think we're going to see drastic changes take place in a month, especially in terms of performance.

It's a little frustrating that this game doesn't save your kit setup. I guess I'll add that to the list of things to post about on their forums.

The F2000 blows too. The rate of fire is awesome but in this game damage wins over ROF almost every time thanks to the wonky accuracy and framerate. Oh, and I love lightweight. I'm never using the red dot.

I've had a few of those games this morning. It helps when you get a single medal that's worth 5000 XP :P