Kameo :
1up : 7.0
IGN: 8.4
Gamespot: 8.7
Gamespy: 4/5
TeamXbox: 8.8

Project Gotham Racing 3 :
1up : 10
IGN : 8.8
Gamepro : 8.0
TeamXbox : 9.4
Gamespot : 8.8

Madden NFL 06 :
IGN : 8.0
Next Level G : 8.2
TeamXbox : 8.0
Gamespot : 7.4
1up : 8.0

NBA 2K6 :
IGN : 7.8
1up : 7.0
Gamespot : 8.3
TeamXbox : 8.5

Amped 3 :
1up : 7.0
Gamespy : 3.5/10
IGN : 6.9
Gamespot : 7.6

Fifa 06: RTWC :
1up : 7.0
IGN : 6.9

Call of Duty 2 :
Totalgames : 9.4
Gamespot : 8.8
Gamepro : 10
TeamXbox : 9.0
Official Xbox Magazine US: 9.0
Next Level G : 9.2
IGN : 9.0
1up : 9.0

Need for Speed: Most Wanted :
Totalgames : 7.8
1up : 8.5
IGN : 8.0
TeamXbox : 8.3
Gamespot : 8.4

Tony Hawk: American Wasteland :
Gamepro : 9.0
IGN : 8.3
Gamespot : 6.3
TeamXbox : 7.0

GUN :
Gamepro : 9.0
Gamespy : 4/5
IGN : 7.9
Next Level G : 8.5
Gamespot : 6.4

Condemned :
Official Xbox Magazine US: 8.5
IGN : 8.7
Gamespot : 8.0
1up : 8.0

King Kong :
Official Xbox Magazine US: 9.0

NHL 2K6 :
IGN : 7.5
TeamXbox : 7.7

NBA Live 06 :
Gamepro : 7.0
1up : 7.5
IGN : 5.9
TeamXbox : 8.1

Ridge Racer 6 :
1up : 8.5

Swedish magazine Super Play reviewed Perfect Dark Zero, and gave it a 9/10. They also gave Condemned 9/10. Not that reliable.
For comparison, other scores:
Project Gotham Racing 3 - 9
Kameo - 6
FIFA 06: Road to World Cup - 7

Swedish magazine Reset reviewed Perfect Dark Zero, and gave it 7/10. They also reviewed:
Project Gotham Racing 3 - 10 (second opinion: 9)
Kameo: Elements of Power - 8 (5)
Condemned - 8

Updated: 20/11

The topic will be updated when new reviews are online.

Exactly, everybody fears the Gregster. It's mind bogglingly confusing to the point of PAIN that IGN gave it 8.4 because they usually hand out 9's like candy. It's also a shocker that the game is "8 to 10 hours long" after Rare throwing numbers like 30 (!!) around for the main quest.

Anyway, Gamespot - and Greg, Jeff and Alex in particular - is where my trust lies, so I'm picking Kameo up for release.

Roll on the PDZ reviews!

IGN now has a NBA2K6 review up as well. They give it a 7.8 and call it the "Sadly the best basketball game on the 360".

http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/666/666970p4.html

They love the player and court graphics, but are upset that the coaches look bad and that it is "the same exact game that we saw in the current generation. While 2K6 was a very good game on those consoles, we want to be blown away by our next-generation games" in reference to features and gameplay--they did not cut anything at all, but they did not add anything less the on court visuals.

One odd comment: "NBA 2K6 for the Xbox 360 is an improvement over the current-generation version, but only barely. The fact that you can only get a hint of the 360's power when you go into high-definition mode on your HD set tells me that gamers may want to think twice before throwing down the $450-plus needed to bring this particular NBA experience into their homes."

This is one of those comments that makes you smack your head. While I know that a lot of general consumers have a hard time judging graphics, let alone distinguishing between art and technology and visuals and animation, I have to laugh if they have a hard time seeing the difference in lower resolutions. The stadiums and the player models--and the fluidity of the models and unis--sticks out.

It is like watching a Lord of the Rings on TV broadcast or LotR on DVD. Yeah the DVD version looks better, but no one is going to mistake the TV broadcast CGI for the old Donkey Kong CGI cartoon! And comparing the DK CGI in HD still wont make it look better than the LotR CGI!

"That is, for the price of the premium Xbox 360 bundle and a copy of NBA 2K6 you're going to get the same game we saw two months ago on PS2 and Xbox but with slightly better player models and improved animations when you're playing on an HD display in 720p. If you're squinting you might confuse high definition NBA 2K6 for a live broadcast, but I think Xbox 360 fans can and should expect more out of developers and the hardware as we all move forward with this new console."

Slightly upgraded player models?

Not only do they have superior poly counts and textures, the models have a slew of advanced graphical features being applied (ambient occlusion, haze, sweat, skin shaders, eye shaders, beaded sweat, multi source light reflections and color, etc). The game has AA, DOF, adaptive filtering, and so forth. And it also has the sexy cloth physics that give a great sense of motion and individuality--not to mention they get sweat stains in game!!

To call these slightly upgraded player models is a crime. With their comment about "expecting more" from next gen in regards to this issue is a joke. Yes, games will get better and look better, but expecting more at launch? No PC game running on top end hardware has pushed out player models as good as NBA 2K6.

We are talking about models and technology not found on current PC games or current gen Console games. They are significant upgrades over the current gen models, so I do not know what they are seeing if they think they are only slight upgrades. That definately is overstating their let down with the game.

I'm also baffled at the fact that they go "THIS GAME IS THE SAME GAME - AND IT'S THE SAME GAME!!"

I mean what the hell?

Kameo :
Gamespy: 4/5

I'll be honest, I always take a crapload of time to complete a game. People said PDS was 8 hours long and I spent like 17 hours before I finished it. I'm just terrible at rushing through stuff.

IGN review of PGR3 is up:
http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/667/667076p3.html

IGN are being anal for the sake of being anal it seems. They have issues that never were issues in the past. PGR3 seems to be marked down for at its core being PGR2, but with that logic, how the hell did MGS2 manage 9.fuck knows what?

So yeah, I think they've plain made up their minds about being extremely harsh and mention "expect more" and "next gen" a whole bunch.

I'm just gonna wait for Gamespot to review the lot.