GT5 - new info - Main forum

Since 5537 Days

The damage control on this game is off the charts!!

Who cares if its is not the second coming of Jesus Christ?

Game will be a really good driving game IMO.

In reply to

Real Madrid C.F. fan.

dcdelgado

Since 6690 Days

Will still pick this game at some point when its cheap enough, but reading each review has really dulled my appetite.

In reply to

** Yes We CAN!! **

Frozpot

Since 6588 Days

I've never seen so many excuses/blind over-acceptance. It's as if all GT had to have was good driving phisics( debatable, IMO) and the rest of the game could be mediocre. The graphical inconsistancy is the biggest offender. Of course having weak AI has NO effect on the racing in the game. Or the poor collision physics. Or the MAJORITY of the cars being shit to mediocre visually. Or the low-poly tracks. It's all ok if the base driving physics are good. Lol. Some people have been so brain-washed that it's massively laughable. I haven't played it myself( other than the demo's at Best Buy) so I can only comment on what I can see, but I can certainly see that there has been a lot of misleading press about it up till now...

In reply to

Oooh, Profound, isn't it?

GriftGFX

Since 6830 Days

Posted by szaromir

MYTF - your example was still preposterous. Halo 3 had many gameplay enhancements, AI, physics, equuipment (which goes beyond weapon balance). However, as I understand it, GT5 directly reuses a lot of content from GT4 with 80% of vehicles and significant percentage of tracks, whereas Halo 3 has entirely new campaign, a bunch of new maps and a bunch of remade maps, not reused ( not imported from Halo 2). That's why your example was totally absurd.

It's kind of annoying that people assume that game x deserves 10/10 rating and anyone who rates it lower is an idiot/can't play/biased/based the review on hype etc. I did complain about reviews in case of GTA4 and Mass Effect 2, they unnecessarily raised my expectations and I was sorely disappointed about the game. However, I only did so after I had played the game.

Holy shit, don't bother dude.

Jesus i enjoyed Halo 3 it was good laugh.. not been fanboy here...i am just assuming your mad fanboy rage looked past the point i was trying to make.

Please. You had no point. Shut the fuck up and get on topic, or go away.

In reply to

[quote=szaromir]MYTF - your example was still preposterous. Halo 3 had many gameplay enhancements, AI, physics, equuipment (which goes beyond weapon balance). However, as I understand it, GT5 directly reuses a lot of content from GT4 with 80% of vehicles and significant percentage of tracks, whereas Halo 3 has entirely new campaign, a bunch of new maps and a bunch of remade maps, not reused ( not imported from Halo 2). That's why your example was totally absurd.

It's kind of annoying that people assume that game x deserves 10/10 rating and anyone who rates it lower is an idiot/can't play/biased/based the review on hype etc. I did complain about reviews in  case of GTA4 and Mass Effect 2, they unnecessarily raised my expectations and I was sorely disappointed about the game. However, I only did so after I had played the game.[/quote]

Holy shit, don't bother dude.

[quote]Jesus i enjoyed Halo 3 it was good laugh.. not been fanboy here...i am just assuming your mad fanboy rage looked past the point i was trying to make.[/quote]

Please. You had no point. Shut the fuck up and get on topic, or go away.

sanex

Since 5017 Days

Posted by Frozpot

I've never seen so many excuses/blind over-acceptance. It's as if all GT had to have was good driving phisics( debatable, IMO) and the rest of the game could be mediocre. The graphical inconsistancy is the biggest offender. Of course having weak AI has NO effect on the racing in the game. Or the poor collision physics. Or the MAJORITY of the cars being shit to mediocre visually. Or the low-poly tracks. It's all ok if the base driving physics are good. Lol. Some people have been so brain-washed that it's massively laughable. I haven't played it myself( other than the demo's at Best Buy) so I can only comment on what I can see, but I can certainly see that there has been a lot of misleading press about it up till now...

I have to admit the attempted damage control is this thread is embarrassing.

In reply to

Jin187

Since 6574 Days

Posted by Frozpot

I've never seen so many excuses/blind over-acceptance. It's as if all GT had to have was good driving phisics( debatable, IMO) and the rest of the game could be mediocre. The graphical inconsistancy is the biggest offender. Of course having weak AI has NO effect on the racing in the game. Or the poor collision physics. Or the MAJORITY of the cars being shit to mediocre visually. Or the low-poly tracks. It's all ok if the base driving physics are good. Lol. Some people have been so brain-washed that it's massively laughable. I haven't played it myself( other than the demo's at Best Buy) so I can only comment on what I can see, but I can certainly see that there has been a lot of misleading press about it up till now...

It really is shocking how people (also in this thread) think that standard cars are acceptable, i mean, just look at this....

Just look at it, its embarrassing, what on earth were they thinking???

In reply to

[quote=Frozpot]I've never seen so many excuses/blind over-acceptance.  It's as if all GT had to have was good driving phisics( debatable, IMO) and the rest of the game could be mediocre.  The graphical inconsistancy is the biggest offender.  Of course having weak AI has NO effect on the racing in the game. Or the poor collision physics.  Or the MAJORITY of the cars being shit to mediocre visually.  Or the low-poly tracks.  It's all ok if the base driving physics are good.  Lol.  Some people have been so brain-washed that it's massively laughable.  I haven't played it myself( other than the demo's at Best Buy) so I can only comment on what I can see, but I can certainly see that there has been a lot of misleading press about it up till now...[/quote]

It really is shocking how people (also in this thread) think that standard cars are acceptable, i mean, just look at this....

[img]http://image.bayimg.com/aaakjaadn.jpg[/img]
[img]http://image.bayimg.com/aaakmaadn.jpg[/img]
[img]http://i56.tinypic.com/hu0cjt.jpg[/img]

Just look at it, its embarrassing, what on earth were they thinking???

GriftGFX

Since 6830 Days

Wait... that's GT5? I'm so confused. I saw a post on Kotaku (or Gizmodo) comparing GT5 screen shots to real life. How could there be such a huge gap between some images and others?

In reply to

Frozpot

Since 6588 Days

Yeah, and those shots are missing the aliasing. You can't see the janky shadows either....

In reply to

Oooh, Profound, isn't it?

GriftGFX

Since 6830 Days

I don't even understand how that happened. There are clearly better looking models in the game (hell, prologue clearly looks better). Talk about a lack of consistency.

In reply to

scoobs0688

Since 5464 Days

Terrible standard model right there, atleast premium models looks good. It'll be interesting to see what they do w/ GT6. 1000 premium cars?

In reply to

Currently playing: Bad Company 2(PC), Uncharted 2(PS3), Dead Space (PS3)

ManThatYouFear

Since 6773 Days

Posted by Jin187

It really is shocking how people (also in this thread) think that standard cars are acceptable, i mean, just look at this....

[img]http://image.bayimg.com/aaakjaadn.jpg[img]
[img]http://image.bayimg.com/aaakmaadn.jpg[img]

Just look at it, its embarrassing, what on earth were they thinking???

Is that one for real ? as i said i bought the game i just dont intend on playing it yet.. but seriously img3?

In reply to

I want my games room finished now :(

szaromir

Since 6586 Days

Posted by GriftGFX

I don't even understand how that happened. There are clearly better looking models in the game (hell, prologue clearly looks better). Talk about a lack of consistency.

Apparently they decided to import cars and tracks from GT4, some of them without any retouching whatsoever.

In reply to

"That just happened 'cause that was awesome" - Randy Pitchford, Gearbox

Slabs

Since 6860 Days

Posted by szaromir

Apparently they decided to import cars and tracks from GT4, some of them without any retouching whatsoever.

Bullet points on the back of the box. Simple as that. "OVER 1,000 CARS!" isn't a lie, but it isn't exactly the whole truth.

In reply to

ManThatYouFear

Since 6773 Days

To be fair who wants to race the celica anyway :)...supra on the other hand

In reply to

I want my games room finished now :(

Corellianrogue

Since 5994 Days

Posted by ManThatYouFear

Most big AAA games dont send there review code out till very last thing.

I know, I was just pointing out the hypocritical hysteria over the (as you pointed out, standard practice) Kinect review embargo when it was obviously actually about a day (or at least a few days in the case of IGN's Sonic Free Riders review) earlier than GT5's review embargo.

In reply to

Stacy>>>>>>>>>>Fergie http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ne0rqn_VAOE

Kids Incorporated (original members)>>>>>>>>>>Any band since! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gbcgNhYC7M

GriftGFX

Since 6830 Days

Posted by szaromir

Apparently they decided to import cars and tracks from GT4, some of them without any retouching whatsoever.

Yeah, that's pretty pathetic. Was it really necessary to have 1000 cars if a number of them look that bad? Holy shit.

In reply to

ManThatYouFear

Since 6773 Days

Posted by Corellianrogue

.

Most people like to moan, i am one of these people.. but there is a diffrence i suppose between the review of a £130 piece of kit and a £34.99 game, but if people were THAT bothered by reviews, i am sure they could wait a few more days to read reviews before buying the product, not like they HAVE to buy it on launch, not like there family is going to die if they do not.

In reply to

I want my games room finished now :(

IRAIPT0IR

Since 5537 Days

Posted by GriftGFX

Yeah, that's pretty pathetic. Was it really necessary to have 1000 cars if a number of them look that bad? Holy shit.

They dropped the ball pretty bad, I mean 5+ years in the making and "that" its one of the cars you can get :/

I really hope you are not stuck with non premium cars for too long at the start of the game if not the backlash will be insane,driving simulation or not.

In reply to

Real Madrid C.F. fan.

ManThatYouFear

Since 6773 Days

Seriously that IMG3 is ...wow, why cant i stop ... wow, the deadly smooth frame then bang unltra jaggie lights that have bigger jaggies than GT1

In reply to

I want my games room finished now :(

Frozpot

Since 6588 Days

Posted by ManThatYouFear

To be fair who wants to race the celica anyway :)...supra on the other hand

It may not apply so much to you, but that is exactly the kind of stuff the SDF have been spouting as some kind of excuse. Then they get pissed when people don't want to give the game a 10/10. That pic isn't indicative of the games AA though, and the "jaggies" are the pixels from the mega low-rez texture.

In reply to

Oooh, Profound, isn't it?