Microsoft and Silicon Knights produced this trailer for Too Human, where they explain more about Battlecries. The game will feature a co-op mode which will be playable online with one friend.
I don't know what it is, but there's something seriously missing from this game that questions the hype. I haven't seen anything as far as gameplay that will make me go out and buy this. The actions looks so stale that it could easily be mistaken for a game from the past two generations. For a game that's been in development for over a decade, it still looks like it's in the position from where it started. I'm not being mean, but come on; does anyone really think this game warrants such a long development cycle? I can't imagine the budget. They keep saying that the gameplay features rpg elements, but what they've shown just looks like some boring upgrade system at best. I want to be so wrong about this game just as I was wrong about GTAIV. Boy was I ever wrong. I'll keep my figers crossed.
Commented on 2008-06-14 18:10:55 In reply to omegaheat
Totally agree. It certainly doesnt look like a title to warrent 8years development time. The graphics already appear very dated..with subpar textures, the level design is uninspired...all i seem to see are wide open spaces (obviously because they designed it with 4players in mind). Whats worse is that the gameplay itself just seems unappealing, addopting an xbla gameplay mechanic of mindless spraying...only littered with poor animations.
Seriously, this game needs a good demo to sell it. SK getting one out before launch though wouldnt be a safe bet.
Whilst i was excited for this game initially i can't bring myself to care about it any more. I think with all the videos and screenshots that have been released i've seen all there is to see: big wide corridoors with the same 2/3 enemies.
Agree, wide corridors, combat that looks slow and boring, characters lack personality and generally seem dull, and design that doesn't offer anything that hasn't been done/seen before.
Still, I hope the full product will at last reveal the potential Dyack's been going on like forever
Commented on 2008-06-14 19:56:36 In reply to onerous
Posted by onerous
Agree, wide corridors, combat that looks slow and boring, characters lack personality and generally seem dull, and design that doesn't offer anything that hasn't been done/seen before.
Still, I hope the full product will at last reveal the potential Dyack's been going on like forever
Slow and boring? You must not have watched any of the combat videos then. If anything the combat is too fast for certain classes.
As for the wide corridors, it does seem that we have only seen battles from the first hub, the hall of heroes. Certainly cyberspace is not a bunch of corridors.
As for role playing elements, it is chock full of rogue-like yumminess.
I don't doubt Too Human will be a good game (if not great, but we'll see) but they really need to hire a new advertising firm. This campaign is so...BLAND.
Commented on 2008-06-14 20:44:10 In reply to privatejohn
Posted by privatejohn
SK need to stop producing such video, it kills the hype!
No doubts, I understand why they think they need to aggressively market the game but still they release a bazillion videos which most of them are fairly boring.
i cant see this game doing anything but flop. most people tend to either hate it or be on the fence and i dont thing playing the game in demo form is going to change that. i think they should have just scrapped the idea after the poor showing at E3.
Commented on 2008-06-15 05:13:59 In reply to Brandino
Posted by Brandino
No doubts, I understand why they think they need to aggressively market the game but still they release a bazillion videos which most of them are fairly boring.
Not to mention how tiring the audience can get with each video, it's as if we have already finish the game by watching all the footage.
They doesn't need to release so many boring video, instead they should produce quality trailer. Quality > quantity.
The only video I actually liked was the one released on marketplace, showcasing the bar fight - it was really atmospheric and well done. Other trailers showing gameplay just don't show the potential which supposedly is there. This game really needs one GOOD trailer.
Commented on 2008-06-15 17:05:34 In reply to KORNdog
Posted by KORNdog
i cant see this game doing anything but flop. most people tend to either hate it or be on the fence and i dont thing playing the game in demo form is going to change that. i think they should have just scrapped the idea after the poor showing at E3.
There's plenty of people still interested in this game and it could turn out great.
So yes, animations are HORRIBLE (seriously!), graphics are not great but decent, and it lacks the coolness/flair some other games with a kind of similar gameplay have. But it also has a lot going for it: Gameplay looks fun imo, some of the environments look very cool, the story seems promising, the looting/upgrade system looks solid and there's probably more stuff I forget.
I've been very harsh on this game for it's lacking in certain departments, but what you're saying is plain nonsense. Perhaps this won't turn out to be AAA, but I'm still interested and so are many other with me. Not everybody hates it or is on the fence about. Please, don't spill such nonsense here.
The game is just a week away from going gold, so that much needed demo should be coming our way very shortly. I guess we'll all have our answers by then.
5 bucks says it's actually a solid and unique title ;)
nostradamus
plese gayders, get that high quality Diablo IV real-time cutscene. And DiabloII to check the insane isometric tapestry filled w/ granular detail, if you may. (1 Week ago)
nostradamus
disregards the chock points of "skmirches", the traversel is pretty smooth. Higly recommended and a classic dying breed formula of pc action shooter. (2 Weeks ago)
nostradamus
i'm enjoying Control immensely and for a late last-gen game, going by the Disgusting on-basis unacceptable performance of games/worlds, the base console performance is pretty much decent, if one (2 Weeks ago)
Driftwood
GSY is getting some nice content at 3 pm CEST with our July podcast and some videos of the Deus Ex Mankind Divided preview build. :) (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
For once we'll be live at 4:30 pm CEST. Blim should not even be tired! (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
More Quantum Break coverage coming in a few hours, 9:00 a.m CEST. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
We'll have a full review up for Firewatch at 7 pm CET. Videos will only be tomorrow though. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
Tonight's livestream will be at 9:15 GMT+1, not GMT+2 as first stated. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
New GSY Live dedicated this time to Just Cause 3 on Tuesday 9:30 GMT+2 (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
Join us tomorrow at 10 pm GMT+2 for a new livestream. We'll be playing Rise of the Tomb Raider. (> 3 Months ago)
All comments (25)
but SK next time needs to release one major video showing all they've got, these constant videos makes the game less anticipating
Seriously, this game needs a good demo to sell it. SK getting one out before launch though wouldnt be a safe bet.
Still, I hope the full product will at last reveal the potential Dyack's been going on like forever
Still, I hope the full product will at last reveal the potential Dyack's been going on like forever
As for the wide corridors, it does seem that we have only seen battles from the first hub, the hall of heroes. Certainly cyberspace is not a bunch of corridors.
As for role playing elements, it is chock full of rogue-like yumminess.
PLEASE BE GOOD!
The initial thoughts of Too Human are mostly negative and so if the demo is good, the game's reputation may get back on track.
Yet if the demo reflects the fears of potential customers, the game itself may be in severe trouble.
They doesn't need to release so many boring video, instead they should produce quality trailer. Quality > quantity.
what a shame they didnt make another Eternal Darkness, that game was amazing.
So yes, animations are HORRIBLE (seriously!), graphics are not great but decent, and it lacks the coolness/flair some other games with a kind of similar gameplay have. But it also has a lot going for it: Gameplay looks fun imo, some of the environments look very cool, the story seems promising, the looting/upgrade system looks solid and there's probably more stuff I forget.
I've been very harsh on this game for it's lacking in certain departments, but what you're saying is plain nonsense. Perhaps this won't turn out to be AAA, but I'm still interested and so are many other with me. Not everybody hates it or is on the fence about. Please, don't spill such nonsense here.
5 bucks says it's actually a solid and unique title ;)
but then with intense gameplay.
I'm just hoping they don't screw up the anticipation