Ubisoft released Gearbox' Brothers in Arms: Hell's Highway last week on Playstation 3 and Xbox 360, while the PC version will hit the stores next week. Here are the first 10 Minutes of the game, actually more than that since the intro is really long. Some of this is in the newly released Playstation 3 demo, but since it's not sure when the Xbox 360 version comes up I decided to just capture this part for now.


We got the game really late so I haven't really been able to play it much, but so far I've been pleasantly surprised with it. The graphics aren't that bad and some things actually look pretty good, specially the ground - a part a lot of game developers seems to ignore. I've always been a fan of the series and this is very much like the previous games, so I really can't complain on the gameplay. As you will see in the video when I enter the house, the enemy sometimes simply stands still in the open just waiting to be shot. Close combat, specially in buildings, doesn't work well with the AI.

So the AI isn't exactly groundbreaking , and the Unreal Engine 3 slow texture loading is as usual fully visible in the cut-scenes. The much hyped "emotions" the characters show leave a lot to be desired, something we could see in the previous trailers - they just doesn't seem to be alive enough to show the tears, hopelessness that the developers seem to aim at.

As usual you guys are free to write your impressions in the comments below, and if you haven't played the game yet, enjoy these videos below.
squarejawhero
squarejawhero
Commented on 2008-10-05 01:30:51
Despite the really, really obvious technical difficulties, I really have to admire the ambition. Sure, the script is a little stilted, the camera direction's going for Scorcese but is hamstrung by bad pacing and the delivery is hampered by robotic faces, but it's admirable in the sense that it's very close to achieving its goal. And yet it's also frustrating that it's not quite attained it.

It actually made me think of Ace Combat 6, which stunningly had better cutscenes with very crisp graphics and nice character models - and that's a game which didn't really need character models for the gameplay. Again, that had some real nasty scripted moments, but it really tried to deepen the core gameplay experience by making you feel you were making a difference, whilst trying to (mawkishly, maybe) actually say something about how war affects people on all sides.

It's a shame UE3's texture loading difficulties and some nasty tearing and slowdown affect it so much, but you know - sometimes I really feel developers are almost trying too hard. Too many effects when they're actually losing out by layering too much. It'd be better to tone them down and up the performance rather than make the story suffer by obvious technical faults.

That said it's a reasonable looker and the fact that the locations are real and mapped out so closely... despite the problems, I may end up eventually picking this up.

(oh and it's "leave a lot to be desired") ;)
In reply to
jklmr3
jklmr3
Commented on 2008-10-05 01:35:00
Poor AI...Poor density.....
In reply to
licenturion
licenturion
Commented on 2008-10-05 02:09:02
Almost completed it. It's a great game in terms of gameplay and graphics.
Each level is fairly long and really varied. Also you feel like you are in a wide open environment, a feeling that was not really apparent in a game like COD4

The story is bad though. I almost completed the game and can barely follow the story, nor am I attached to any character. It's just drama for the sake of drama...
In reply to
Baleur
Baleur
Commented on 2008-10-05 02:36:20
Manager-dude.. How is the multiplayer? Is it as laggy as it was for me with the 360 version? (practically unplayable with enemies running into walls and teleporting away, it felt alot like the good old pc internet days with a 28.8k modem)
Or does the ps3 version somehow have a better netcode? Thanks.
In reply to
romeolives
romeolives
Commented on 2008-10-05 08:05:45
Although it has some issues (AI + limited terrain), it really is a great game. Looking forward to the sequel !
In reply to
Stoffinator
Stoffinator
Commented on 2008-10-05 08:22:54
Its not that bad of a game. Some issues as stated above, but over all a good experience.
In reply to
j0k3r
j0k3r
Commented on 2008-10-05 13:36:42
I really enjoyed it even though it had a few problems was just a shame it was over so quick! Can't wait for the next one were hopefully they sort put the texture loading (only Epic have no texture loading problems with unreal engine! LOL) and sort out the animations and facial expressions! Because they were pretty bad! Worth the wait though but I have all the BiA games so I'm a bit of a fan. :)
In reply to
PlumbDrumb - Still drinking
PlumbDrumb
Commented on 2008-10-05 13:42:44
This game would be good, if not for the horrible texture loading.

(joking guys; I've not played this game)
In reply to
Inflatable
Inflatable
Commented on 2008-10-05 14:27:26
As you will see in the video when I enter the house, the enemy sometimes simply stands still in the open just waiting to be shot. Close combat, specially in buildings, doesn't work well with the AI.
Shows that all the multi-core and Cell processors in the world are useless if you don't have programmers that can write good AI for a game..
and the Unreal Engine 3 slow texture loading is as usual fully visible in the cut-scenes.
Yup, that is pretty dumb aswell, especially on a PC which has plenty of RAM to load everything in it's memory before you go into the game or cutscene.. But I guess you can only blame Epic for that, I think they put it in to deal with the limited memory of the consoles and keep loadingtimes down.. I wonder if UE 3.5 will still have that "feature" (It probably will)..

BIA:HH still looks cool and has my interest though, especially because it plays in my own country.. I'll check it out on PC when it's released..
In reply to
This message and account have been deleted at the user's request
PlumbDrumb - Still drinking
PlumbDrumb
Commented on 2008-10-05 15:23:14
I don't believe a fucking word of that.
sorry :)
In reply to
bleachedsmiles
bleachedsmiles
Commented on 2008-10-05 15:23:26
Bakers actually 23yrs old, thats what war does to you.. gives you Dawson creek syndrome
In reply to
This message and account have been deleted at the user's request
PlumbDrumb - Still drinking
PlumbDrumb
Commented on 2008-10-05 16:49:03
no no, sorry.
Just realised I'm wrong about everything.

I'ts hard to accept this game may not be the stuff, I've been waiting for it to come.
In reply to
Se777eN
Se777eN
Commented on 2008-10-05 17:04:18
Finished the game is less than 9 hours AI was poor and it it got boring online is poor as hell but the story mode was good..
In reply to
extraextra
extraextra
Commented on 2008-10-05 17:36:04
Is it just me or does this look worse than the ps3 demo? I don't know, I think its the colors
In reply to
This message and account have been deleted at the user's request
newbielives
newbielives
Commented on 2008-10-05 21:15:34
Posted by droezelke
Graphically, there is no difference between PS3 an 360.
Is the 360's framerate only better in cut scenes or during gameplay aswell?
In reply to
Trebby
Trebby
Commented on 2008-10-05 22:00:31 In reply to licenturion
Posted by licenturion
Almost completed it. It's a great game in terms of gameplay and graphics.
Each level is fairly long and really varied. Also you feel like you are in a wide open environment, a feeling that was not really apparent in a game like COD4

The story is bad though. I almost completed the game and can barely follow the story, nor am I attached to any character. It's just drama for the sake of drama...
varied? each level is just the same old stuff. a pool of 3-4 enemies, surpress them, flank them, kill them. and on to the next 4 groups of enemies. and once in a while you can ride a tank or go solo. that's it. graphics are pretty good but not outstanding good.

it's a pretty average game and everything which the game has as it's "features", we have already seen in the past. So in my point of view, this game has failed to impress and deliver something new.
In reply to
Ve3tro
Ve3tro
Commented on 2008-10-05 22:01:03
I thought the demo was pretty boring, to me it didn't feel like there was enough action. Hopefully the full game delivers more.
In reply to
moroboshi
moroboshi
Commented on 2008-10-06 00:19:12
I played through the demo and was unimpressed. It's not a bad game to play, just average, but visually it's really sub-par. It has an overly colourful cartoony look, which is pretty gaudy at times, the lip syncing and animation in general is absolutely terrible, the environments are simplistic and flat, and the frame rate is all over the place.

With all the amazing games due out soon this is going to get lost, and it will be no great loss.
In reply to
licenturion
licenturion
Commented on 2008-10-06 02:56:47 In reply to Trebby
Posted by TrebuTa
varied? each level is just the same old stuff. a pool of 3-4 enemies, surpress them, flank them, kill them. and on to the next 4 groups of enemies. and once in a while you can ride a tank or go solo. that's it. graphics are pretty good but not outstanding good
It's as varied as other games like COD4 or GOW. Find cover, point and shoot. Move to next cover: find enemy point and shoot. Everyone dead; move to next area and repeat proces...

If you want extremely varied gameplay play Zelda :)
In reply to
This message and account have been deleted at the user's request
This message and account have been deleted at the user's request
dofry
dofry
Commented on 2008-10-06 09:18:01
Posted by droezelke
During gameplay, the framerate is solid on both systems.
In cutscenes, both versions have stuttering. No difference between the 360 and the PS3.
In reply to
About the game
Platform
PC X360 PS3
Published by
Ubisoft
Developed by
Gearbox Software
Patreon

$224 of $400 per month

What's up?
  • MikeManiac61

    MikeManiac61 @jmd749: Think i'm gonna try the demo out to see what the fuss is about. It looks fun and cartoony. (2 Days ago)

  • jmd749

    jmd749 @der_ton: Yeah, I took a chance and got it on sale for £10, but I would have gladly paid £15. :) (2 Days ago)

  • der_ton

    der_ton yeah even the Supraland demo had alot to offer. It's on my wishlist now. (3 Days ago)

  • jmd749

    jmd749 I am hooked on Supraland, finding every nook and cranny. Proper OCD stuff. :) (4 Days ago)

  • MrWhite

    MrWhite Inject it into your veins? [url] (4 Days ago)

  • Tinks

    Tinks @Loakum: yeah. They finally portray Peter Parker properly in this one (4 Days ago)

  • nostradamus

    nostradamus INJECT THIS RIGHT INTO MY VEINS [url] damn timming with RE2make, they won't make a new HD Remaster of RE3, but i WANT IT! (4 Days ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood GSY is getting some nice content at 3 pm CEST with our July podcast and some videos of the Deus Ex Mankind Divided preview build. :) (> 3 Months ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood For once we'll be live at 4:30 pm CEST. Blim should not even be tired! (> 3 Months ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood More Quantum Break coverage coming in a few hours, 9:00 a.m CEST. (> 3 Months ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood We'll have a full review up for Firewatch at 7 pm CET. Videos will only be tomorrow though. (> 3 Months ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood Tonight's livestream will be at 9:15 GMT+1, not GMT+2 as first stated. (> 3 Months ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood New GSY Live dedicated this time to Just Cause 3 on Tuesday 9:30 GMT+2 (> 3 Months ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood Join us tomorrow at 10 pm GMT+2 for a new livestream. We'll be playing Rise of the Tomb Raider. (> 3 Months ago)

Also on Gamersyde

We reviewed Etherborn

  • Thursday, July 18, 2019
  • Driftwood

Our PC videos of Night Call

  • Wednesday, July 17, 2019
  • Driftwood

Our PS4 Pro videos of Dragon Quest Builders 2

  • Tuesday, July 16, 2019
  • Driftwood