"shakes head".........every time i see sports games, the characters always look like a bunch of mindless husks. 2k and EA should look into using "blend shapes" now for expressions, that would totally make the characters a lot more lifelike.
all of new games are using blend shapes, like Ryse, Uncharted, the order, halo, quantum break. it does serious wonders.
Commented on 2014-08-13 23:16:21 In reply to GunsnSwords
Posted by GunsnSwords
"shakes head".........every time i see sports games, the characters always look like a bunch of mindless husks. 2k and EA should look into using "blend shapes" now for expressions, that would totally make the characters a lot more lifelike.
all of new games are using blend shapes, like Ryse, Uncharted, the order, halo, quantum break. it does serious wonders.
You actually need to see a game animation running to know whether or not if blend shapes are being used. Any game that has facial animation uses them anyway,so they don't need to look into using them, as they've been doing so for years, and to create individual ones based on each person in a game is just far too much of an ask. I'm also not sure why people look at video game human based characters and expect them to resemble real life people or convince that they are. Not even complex offline CG and animation is there yet, so why should a game be any closer?
The technology you're probably thinking of is one that captures facial expressions and animation in the form of pixel data which is then baked into normal maps. LA Noire made use of it, as does Quantum Break. EA bought the tech a few years ago, but for some reason, they've yet to put it to any visible use as yet. Maybe it was just for CGI. Maybe we'll se it in a fighting or golf sim where there are less character models to concentrate on to capture the data from.
you're probably right, i would need to see this in motion. it's just there's something in sports games that makes them feel a little soulless in their expressions. EA's Fight Night and UFC are the only ones which come to mind on fairly good they've progressed, for all of the animations.
Commented on 2014-08-14 03:49:56 In reply to MrWhite
Did you even watch Avatar? Those blue people weren't real. So yes, offline CG is there. Nobody cares to put in the effort though. Can't really blame them though.
That aside, not sure why they don't use the detailed photos they take of the players as part of the textures. Maybe I'm just asking for too much. Not a designer so I don't know their woes.
Commented on 2014-08-14 05:02:57 In reply to bubble2020
Posted by bubble2020
Did you even watch Avatar? Those blue people weren't real. So yes, offline CG is there. Nobody cares to put in the effort though. Can't really blame them though.
That aside, not sure why they don't use the detailed photos they take of the players as part of the textures. Maybe I'm just asking for too much. Not a designer so I don't know their woes.
Bubble, Avatar looked good. I'm not denying that, but it was far from convincing the human brain that those blue things were actually real. Offline renders can make something look completely realistic and utterly convincing when it's a static render. It's when it's animated that the illusion breaks and betrays it's CG origin. Animation is still the biggest hurdle in CGI. We still don't have computers fast enough to capture the tiniest of movements realistically that an organic object or living creature exhibits in real life. It's just the tiniest of details in the nuance of movement that always give it away. There is nothing out there that exists that looks 100% authentic. Yet.
And they do use the photo's of the players as textures, and also as reference points for the model tweaks. They don't need to model these players off of an image plane as you would do traditionally. They are scanned from a number of cameras covering a 360 degree view. All that data gets used to build an accurate true to life model, including mapping. They use the technology in Fifa and a lot of titles now.
Commented on 2014-08-15 06:50:43 In reply to MrWhite
I get what your saying. It's true that nothing is 100% authentic. I doubt it ever will be, but we are pretty close. I don't think it's too much to ask for life-like* characters. CG has come a long way:
It may not be perfect, but it's pretty damn good. It's certainly good enough for me not to complain about it if I ever saw it in a basketball game. Maybe consoles don't have the power and maybe it might take a behemoth of a computer, but no one even tries to take it that far. Again though, I can't blame them.
As for the whole photo thing, I guess I was thinking more along the lines of something like The Vanishing of Ethan Carter. They make models from the photos themselves. Not sure if you ever saw the whole photogrammetry thing they posted earlier. Still, I guess they are doing a lot with the photos as you pointed out.
MrWhite
And if you know your history, that spilled over into America too. "Hill Billies" didn't get that name by accident. There's a very specific reasoning for it. (20 Hours ago)
MrWhite
@jmd749: Yeah. Happened in my country too. Only they used religion and fealty to the monarchy of England as the divider instead of skin colour. Property ownership and jobs were the bribe. (20 Hours ago)
jmd749
is not unique to Trump, neither is it new. It's been happening from the days of Jim crow where poor whites were given the illusion of inclusion. The age old divide and conquer play book. (1 Day ago)
jmd749
Yes, agreed. Had they been anything but white nationals they'd have been slaughtered. Chappelle said it best [url] This manipulation of poor white US nationals... (1 Day ago)
MrWhite
If you storm a building like that and call it a revolution, you better be prepared to die. They clearly weren't or hadn't any clue of what a revolution entails. (1 Day ago)
MrWhite
@gigantor21: I found her to be a bit endearing in how naive she was. The police and guards in that building had the power to literally open up and slaughter the lot of them. (1 Day ago)
gigantor21
@MrWhite: That one lady whining about getting maced even though "it's a revolution" was the patron saint of the insurrectionists: entitled, weak and stupid. (1 Day ago)
Driftwood
GSY is getting some nice content at 3 pm CEST with our July podcast and some videos of the Deus Ex Mankind Divided preview build. :) (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
For once we'll be live at 4:30 pm CEST. Blim should not even be tired! (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
More Quantum Break coverage coming in a few hours, 9:00 a.m CEST. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
We'll have a full review up for Firewatch at 7 pm CET. Videos will only be tomorrow though. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
Tonight's livestream will be at 9:15 GMT+1, not GMT+2 as first stated. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
New GSY Live dedicated this time to Just Cause 3 on Tuesday 9:30 GMT+2 (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
Join us tomorrow at 10 pm GMT+2 for a new livestream. We'll be playing Rise of the Tomb Raider. (> 3 Months ago)
Patreon
All comments (11)
Commented on 2014-08-13 17:02:17
Commented on 2014-08-13 17:09:46 In reply to digi_matrix
Commented on 2014-08-13 18:18:58 In reply to digi_matrix
Commented on 2014-08-13 19:12:12
Commented on 2014-08-13 21:06:43
Commented on 2014-08-13 22:14:43all of new games are using blend shapes, like Ryse, Uncharted, the order, halo, quantum break. it does serious wonders.
Commented on 2014-08-13 23:16:21 In reply to GunsnSwordsall of new games are using blend shapes, like Ryse, Uncharted, the order, halo, quantum break. it does serious wonders.
The technology you're probably thinking of is one that captures facial expressions and animation in the form of pixel data which is then baked into normal maps. LA Noire made use of it, as does Quantum Break. EA bought the tech a few years ago, but for some reason, they've yet to put it to any visible use as yet. Maybe it was just for CGI. Maybe we'll se it in a fighting or golf sim where there are less character models to concentrate on to capture the data from.
Commented on 2014-08-14 00:33:44
Commented on 2014-08-14 03:49:56 In reply to MrWhiteThat aside, not sure why they don't use the detailed photos they take of the players as part of the textures. Maybe I'm just asking for too much. Not a designer so I don't know their woes.
Commented on 2014-08-14 05:02:57 In reply to bubble2020That aside, not sure why they don't use the detailed photos they take of the players as part of the textures. Maybe I'm just asking for too much. Not a designer so I don't know their woes.
And they do use the photo's of the players as textures, and also as reference points for the model tweaks. They don't need to model these players off of an image plane as you would do traditionally. They are scanned from a number of cameras covering a 360 degree view. All that data gets used to build an accurate true to life model, including mapping. They use the technology in Fifa and a lot of titles now.
Commented on 2014-08-15 06:50:43 In reply to MrWhitehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fBR4cT-0sKY
It may not be perfect, but it's pretty damn good. It's certainly good enough for me not to complain about it if I ever saw it in a basketball game. Maybe consoles don't have the power and maybe it might take a behemoth of a computer, but no one even tries to take it that far. Again though, I can't blame them.
As for the whole photo thing, I guess I was thinking more along the lines of something like The Vanishing of Ethan Carter. They make models from the photos themselves. Not sure if you ever saw the whole photogrammetry thing they posted earlier. Still, I guess they are doing a lot with the photos as you pointed out.