something is really wrong with all of you. i thing the game looks gorgeos and i can't wait to get it. it is a shame that you people would want more than that. u guys are very selfish
How can a next gen game have worse graphics than a current gen game. If you put this trailer next to forza or PGR2 you would think that it was from the same generation. sorry but this is a good chance for me to release a lot of hate on EA.
For a start have you noticed how when EA takes over a games developer they ruin the that game series. Take Burnout, it was a great racing game that had raw racing with some sick crash and sound effects. But as soon as EA gets its hands on it they flood it with advertising on every corner and jazz it up with over the top effects and dumbed down gameplay. Another game ruined is james bond. Goldeneye from rare was the nuts, true to the film with incredible graphics and gameplay. EA comes along and makes 7 or 8 crap bond games, not only that but also use the name of goldeneye to make that joke of a FPS, Rogue agent.
I could think of more...
For EA it's all about making as much money as possible for as little effort as possible. They've already taken over valve, the genius behind half life, just think if they get ubisoft aswell. You could be getting cross com messages on ghost recon 3 advertising pepsi or a new bond game.
I wouldn't piss on EA if it was on fire.
This industrial look REALLY isn't doing it for me. But anyway...
Please EA, we've seen customization in a lot of previous games. It's old now. No one cares about side flames and enormous spoilers that add *absolutely NO dynamic effect whatsoever*. This was a HUGE opportunity to finally implement a clever wind/dynamics behaviour with all the 360's power, but no. You're going with the cheap models and textures slapped onto already rubbish-looking cars (look at pgr3) instead of being innovative and creating something new for once.
I don't know, I'm just out of words. EA execs = no soul.
Looks good to me, I think some of you have your expectation set WAY to high for next gen.
And while i don't much like EA, don't blame them for putting out crap after crap, blame the consumer for buying it up which makes EA spend less time on quality and more on quantity. Thats right, its the consumers fault EA is making crap.
That is the biggest load of crap i've ever heard. Just cause a lot of people buy their games, it dosent mean they need to make them shit. EA takes cheap shots by aiming their games at regular people that buy games based on TV ads rather than proper reviews. Just look at the console medal of honours. Both shit (both less than 7/10 in the OXM) but sold shit loads due to lots of CGI commercials. You can't blame consumers, its EA thats tricking them into buying crap after crap.
See, you just proved my point, if the consumer would actually look into the games before buying them EA wouldn't churn out crap after crap and actually spend time working on the quality of thier games.
Driftwood
Download is now functional again on Gamersyde. Sorry for the past 53 days or so when it wasn't. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
Another (French) livestream today at 2:30 CEST but you're welcome to drop by and speak English. I will gladly answer in English when I get a chance to catch a breath. :) (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
GSY is getting some nice content at 3 pm CEST with our July podcast and some videos of the Deus Ex Mankind Divided preview build. :) (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
For once we'll be live at 4:30 pm CEST. Blim should not even be tired! (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
More Quantum Break coverage coming in a few hours, 9:00 a.m CEST. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
We'll have a full review up for Firewatch at 7 pm CET. Videos will only be tomorrow though. (> 3 Months ago)
Driftwood
Tonight's livestream will be at 9:15 GMT+1, not GMT+2 as first stated. (> 3 Months ago)
Patreon
All comments (15)
Commented on 2005-09-28 14:40:50
Commented on 2005-09-28 14:46:32Hope that aint xbox 360 version!
Commented on 2005-09-28 15:37:26
Commented on 2005-09-28 16:51:53
Commented on 2005-09-28 17:06:56EAs studios never push the hardware, it doesnt look bad though.
Commented on 2005-09-28 17:30:06
Commented on 2005-09-28 18:15:51For a start have you noticed how when EA takes over a games developer they ruin the that game series. Take Burnout, it was a great racing game that had raw racing with some sick crash and sound effects. But as soon as EA gets its hands on it they flood it with advertising on every corner and jazz it up with over the top effects and dumbed down gameplay. Another game ruined is james bond. Goldeneye from rare was the nuts, true to the film with incredible graphics and gameplay. EA comes along and makes 7 or 8 crap bond games, not only that but also use the name of goldeneye to make that joke of a FPS, Rogue agent.
I could think of more...
For EA it's all about making as much money as possible for as little effort as possible. They've already taken over valve, the genius behind half life, just think if they get ubisoft aswell. You could be getting cross com messages on ghost recon 3 advertising pepsi or a new bond game.
I wouldn't piss on EA if it was on fire.
Commented on 2005-09-28 18:36:58Please EA, we've seen customization in a lot of previous games. It's old now. No one cares about side flames and enormous spoilers that add *absolutely NO dynamic effect whatsoever*. This was a HUGE opportunity to finally implement a clever wind/dynamics behaviour with all the 360's power, but no. You're going with the cheap models and textures slapped onto already rubbish-looking cars (look at pgr3) instead of being innovative and creating something new for once.
I don't know, I'm just out of words. EA execs = no soul.
Commented on 2005-09-28 21:46:23And while i don't much like EA, don't blame them for putting out crap after crap, blame the consumer for buying it up which makes EA spend less time on quality and more on quantity. Thats right, its the consumers fault EA is making crap.
Commented on 2005-09-28 21:52:28
Commented on 2005-09-28 22:06:19
Commented on 2005-09-29 02:57:04
Commented on 2005-09-29 06:01:31
Commented on 2005-09-29 06:15:18
Commented on 2005-09-29 23:38:23