GSY Review PS4

After the release of Final Fantasy XV last week, another game people have been waiting for for a very long time is about to become available. It took 7 years for The Last Guardian to be completed, and it was obviously a cause for concern, especially after some of the previews came out a little while ago. Now is the time to see if the game was worth the wait.
update: 2 FPS analysis videos added, this time on base PS4.


Verdict


While the experience may be flawed, The Last Guardian remains a must-play for anyone searching for something different and impactful. A game similar to previous works by Fumito Ueda, though perhaps closer to ICO than Shadow of the Colossus, this third game certainly took its time. By the time the credits roll and the final cinematic plays out, all doubt is erased, the long wait for The Last Guardian was not in vain. That such a unique and beautiful world may never have been released at all is certainly difficult to consider. To paraphrase Descartes on the subject of mankind, The Last Guadian is an imperfect thing that incessantly tends towards something greater than itself.
  • On the plus side
  • The hypnotic universe created by Ueda and team
  • The poetry which pulls you in from beginning to end
  • A discreet narration in serve of a lovely story
  • Incredible animation work
  • Trico, more real than nature
  • The soundtrack, expertly used
  • Great sound design
  • A plethora of memorable moments throughout
  • Smooth 1080p experience on PS4 Pro
  • On the downside
  • The camera system, tricky to control...
  • The camera can go a tad crazy at times
  • The controller prompts indicating button presses
  • One or two potentially frustrating sections
  • Graphically dated, in terms of textures and lighting effects mostly
  • Some slowdowns on base PS4 and PS4 Pro when running at 4k
  • The occasional bugs

Gammersyde images

  • Gammersyde images
  • Gammersyde images
  • Gammersyde images
  • Gammersyde images
  • Gammersyde images
  • Gammersyde images
  • Gammersyde images
  • Gammersyde images
  • Gammersyde images
  • Gammersyde images
  • Gammersyde images
  • Gammersyde images
  • Gammersyde images
  • Gammersyde images
  • Gammersyde images

12 more Gamersyde images

  • 12 more Gamersyde images
  • 12 more Gamersyde images
  • 12 more Gamersyde images
  • 12 more Gamersyde images
  • 12 more Gamersyde images
  • 12 more Gamersyde images
  • 12 more Gamersyde images
  • 12 more Gamersyde images
  • 12 more Gamersyde images
  • 12 more Gamersyde images
  • 12 more Gamersyde images
  • 12 more Gamersyde images
Sdarts
Sdarts
Commented on 2016-12-05 16:14:57
Great review. And in line with what I was expecting. Team Ico's games were never technical powerhouses and have some control problems. Still, it's great to see that in the parts that most matter, at least to me, the game is a true gem, if going by most reviews.

EuroGame even gave it an "Essential" badge (link below).

EuroGamer Review - Does the successor to Ico and Shadow of the Colossus live up to its lineage? It does so much more:
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2016-12-05-the-l...

NeoGAF - The Last Guardian: Review Thread:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=13223...
In reply to
gonzax
gonzax
Commented on 2016-12-05 16:51:08
Ico and Shadow were two of my favourite games ever. After reading the review I am sure this will be another masterpiece.
In reply to
AndreasZ94
AndreasZ94
Commented on 2016-12-05 16:53:48
Is there an ingame menu option to choose resolution on the ps4 pro?
In reply to
Driftwood - Dictateur en chef
Driftwood
Commented on 2016-12-05 16:57:57 In reply to AndreasZ94
Nope, it has to be done in the console menu itself.

The menu is pretty empty, on-screen prompts cannot even be deactivated...
In reply to
AndreasZ94
AndreasZ94
Commented on 2016-12-05 17:05:24 In reply to Driftwood
Thats a shame. The control hints UI is really distracting
In reply to
Wheat_Thins
Wheat_Thins
Commented on 2016-12-05 17:12:38
I'm really curious what the typical play through length will be.
In reply to
Tinks
Tinks
Commented on 2016-12-05 18:16:28
Hopefully it makes some money

Maybe some day they'll make Shadow of Colossus 2
In reply to
Megido
Megido
Commented on 2016-12-05 18:28:16
I really want to play this, but at the same time i feel like the graphics are complete cabbage and i shouldn't have to pay 60 buckaroos for what is essentially the HD port of a last gen game :P
In reply to
This message and account have been deleted at the user's request
KORNdog
KORNdog
Commented on 2016-12-05 19:18:52 In reply to Wheat_Thins
Posted by Wheat_Thins
I'm really curious what the typical play through length will be.
12 hours based on neogaf early recievers. Good length. Longer than ico and shadow of the collosus. It was honestly my biggest worry.
Posted by droezelke
After all these years, they didn't manage to get a consistant framerate with dated graphics? And then there are bugs on top of that? I'm sorry, but even though it might be a masterpiece, there is no excuse for that.

The camera system was obvious from the last trailer. It made me think of Knack when I saw it.
You'd almost think it was a team ico game, eh? Lol. And it's not like it was being developed for 8 years...
even sony aren't that forgiving with long dev cycles.
In reply to
This message and account have been deleted at the user's request
KORNdog
KORNdog
Commented on 2016-12-05 22:44:59
Posted by droezelke
Come on, you didn't forgive Gearbox for the awfull Duke Nukem, did you?

I've been reading reviews on the game, and I allways skip the 100 scores because those are as reliable as Trump.
So, in almost every review that doesn't praise the game as a true masterpiece, gameplay mechanics and camera issues are mentioned and seem to be a pain in the ass. It's also often mentioned that your pet doesn't allways react to commands which make it frustrating to get timed puzzles done.
And then there are the framerate issues with dated graphics.
So, I'm not buying this game at full price.
They had loads of time to address obvious issues. The fact that they didn't, shows a certain lack of respect.
So your argument is "if you ignore all the majority of possitive reviews, the remaining bad reviews make the game seem shit", well no shit sherlock. You know what, you continue having a brain damaged logic. I'll stick to the average being 80+ on metacritic and see it as what it is. A troubled, albeit still great game.

I mean, do you feel the same about dishonored 2 by any chance?. Did you strip away all the possitive reviews for that game and say to yourself. "Oh, it's got 2 7's and a 5...must be shit". That game also had a plethora of bugs, glitches and a shit framerate. Or are your standards of the double variety? I think the latter.

...And your duke nukem example is fucking dumb too, and you know it.
In reply to
This message and account have been deleted at the user's request
sulei
sulei
Commented on 2016-12-06 00:12:30
Tearing in ps4Pro 1080 mode? Please tell me NOT
In reply to
KORNdog
KORNdog
Commented on 2016-12-06 00:26:52 In reply to sulei
Posted by sulei
Tearing in ps4Pro 1080 mode? Please tell me NOT
Nope. It's vsync'd on all modes

"From a performance perspective, the bottom line is this. The only option available to PlayStation gamers in getting a regularly smooth 30fps is to use PlayStation 4 Pro, running at 1080p. If you're on a regular PS4 you're in for a very variable experience; lurching between 20-30fps just by running around empty areas, and with stutters to over 110ms. All playthroughs have full v-sync, and there are thankfully no frame-pacing issues at 30fps, but sadly playing The Last Guardian on a standard PS4 easily gives the worst performance of all three options."

From Digital foundry.
In reply to
AndreasZ94
AndreasZ94
Commented on 2016-12-06 11:11:56
Played 3-4 hours and i really love it so far. Some first impressions
The visuals are beautiful. There some ps3 era stuff but the art direction, lighting and especially trico are gorgeous
The camera is different to other games and can be a little hard to control sometimes but its not major issue for me. I recommend turning up camera speed option in the menus.
The controls are responsive and the animations are incredible for both the boy and trico. There is occasionally some clumsiness to the controls but i was never frustrated or felt the controls suck.
Also hearing so many people complain its annoying that trico doesn't respond immediately, so far i completely disagree. At first Trico doesn't trust you so of course its trickier but again i was never frustrated at all and now that i ve earned trust Trico is surprisingly very obedient to me. You can give him or her ( not sure which actually) specific commands by holding R1 and pressing the face buttons, left stick.
Overall i think anyone who enjoyed team icos previous games and likes animals they are gonna love this game
In reply to
gonzax
gonzax
Commented on 2016-12-06 16:37:42 In reply to Megido
Well to each their own but I'd happily pay 60 bucks or more for ICO if it came out right now exactly as it was then and the same goes for SOTC, which also suffered from bad frame rate when it came out but that didnt stop it from becoming one of the best games I have ever played.
In reply to
Tinks
Tinks
Commented on 2016-12-06 16:59:34
^Didn't they re-release those in hd?

It is pretty funny that the same issues that plagued those past games are still here.
Typically a dev learns from their mistakes, why do they keep repeating them?
Just because they always have these issues, doesn't make it OKAY korn.
In reply to
KORNdog
KORNdog
Commented on 2016-12-06 19:09:56 In reply to Tinks
Posted by Tinks
^Didn't they re-release those in hd?

It is pretty funny that the same issues that plagued those past games are still here.
Typically a dev learns from their mistakes, why do they keep repeating them?
Just because they always have these issues, doesn't make it OKAY korn.
Says the guy who litterally dribbles cum over the souls series...that have the same appalling framerate issues time and time and time again...but yeah, please. Continue. You don't sound hypocritical at all...nope, not one bit. Lol.
In reply to
Tinks
Tinks
Commented on 2016-12-06 19:15:47 In reply to KORNdog
Posted by KORNdog
Says the guy who litterally dribbles cum over the souls series...that have the same appalling framerate issues time and time and time again...but yeah, please. Continue. You don't sound hypocritical at all...nope, not one bit. Lol.
lol did you mean to quote Megido here Korn? ;P
In reply to
KORNdog
KORNdog
Commented on 2016-12-06 19:18:52 In reply to Tinks
Posted by Tinks
lol did you mean to quote Megido here Korn? ;P
Lol. Brain fart. Sorry. For some reason i read his name. Meh. I will keep it posted to shame myself. Lol.

I will say though, while framerate issues aren't ideal. They also didn't effect my enjoyment of both ico or shadow of the colossus on PS2. So *shrugs*
In reply to
Sdarts
Sdarts
Commented on 2016-12-06 22:25:24
After reading all the comments, and in hopes of putting an end to a stupid discussion - that will never end, really.

Yes, ideally - or to put in another way, in a perfect world - all games should have from none to almost no technical problems and be great at gameplay, visuals, art, direction, story, characters, lore and everything else.

But since we don't live in a perfect world where everything is - obviously - perfect, in our real world we must choose what is most important to each of us. Is it the substance or the package?

And before anyone answers it, please consider the 2 cases below:

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt has a lot of technical issues and hundreds of bugs even to this day, and was far, far worse at launch with many game-breaking bugs. Yet, it's the game with the most number of Game of The Year awards to date, and the general consensus is that it's an excellent game that everyone should play.

The Order: 1886 has gorgeous visuals and a rock-solid framerate that rarely goes below 30fps, and when it does, most of the occurrences happen on cuts, making them totally unnoticeable - it was in this state at launch, before any patches, now it might just be almost perfect technically-wise. But how many Game of The Year awards has it won? And the overall consensus is that the game is average at best, one that not many people would recommend.

So which is it? Substance or package.

PS. There's no wrong answer. What matters to you might not matter to others, and vice-versa.
In reply to
This message and account have been deleted at the user's request
Megido
Megido
Commented on 2016-12-07 01:33:46 In reply to KORNdog
Somehow i just don't get how you can suck so hard at coding that you made the game for PS3, keep all the same shitty looking assets, and it still runs like a fucking potato on hardware form the current gen? I'd be upset if Bloodborne looked like DkS1 and still ran at 25 FPS, for sure.
In reply to
This message and account have been deleted at the user's request
About the game
Platform
PS4
Published by
Sony Computer En...
Developed by
Team Ico
Patreon

$232 of $400 per month

What's up?
  • MikeManiac61

    MikeManiac61 Welp, the GOT finale is tomorrow (even though I haven't watched the episodes yet). I wonder if the ending would be like the Sopranos lol. (6 Hours ago)

  • toelessfoot

    toelessfoot @MrWhite: I did notice a little banding in darkest spots but I really didn't have any issue with what I saw, granted I only watched a few parts. (1 Day ago)

  • b0vril

    b0vril Yea, scenes with poor visibility has been a persistent problem with the show. (1 Day ago)

  • MrWhite

    MrWhite others are suggesting more cynical reasons, like promising better quality on blu ray to drive sales up. (1 Day ago)

  • MrWhite

    MrWhite large chunks of detail were just blocky, and you couldn't see shit beyond the foreground layers. It's being blamed on streaming services, but I put it down to CGI masking by making it dark as possible (1 Day ago)

  • MrWhite

    MrWhite I downloaded a full, uncompressed 1080p source of it, and when I adjusted the brightness on both PC and TV, there were massive bitrate artifacting. (1 Day ago)

  • MrWhite

    MrWhite @toelessfoot: Its nothing to do with that. There have been complaints from a wide range of set ups and TV viewers. (1 Day ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood GSY is getting some nice content at 3 pm CEST with our July podcast and some videos of the Deus Ex Mankind Divided preview build. :) (> 3 Months ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood For once we'll be live at 4:30 pm CEST. Blim should not even be tired! (> 3 Months ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood More Quantum Break coverage coming in a few hours, 9:00 a.m CEST. (> 3 Months ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood We'll have a full review up for Firewatch at 7 pm CET. Videos will only be tomorrow though. (> 3 Months ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood Tonight's livestream will be at 9:15 GMT+1, not GMT+2 as first stated. (> 3 Months ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood New GSY Live dedicated this time to Just Cause 3 on Tuesday 9:30 GMT+2 (> 3 Months ago)

  • Driftwood

    Driftwood Join us tomorrow at 10 pm GMT+2 for a new livestream. We'll be playing Rise of the Tomb Raider. (> 3 Months ago)

Also on Gamersyde

New livestream with 2 special guests

  • Wednesday, May 15, 2019
  • Driftwood

The GSY Livestreams are back

  • Tuesday, May 14, 2019
  • Driftwood

Our videos of A Plague Tale: Innocence

  • Monday, May 13, 2019
  • Driftwood