The XbOne Yard

Since 7578 Days

I mean look at the state of Microsoft's first party efforts. I'll stick to the language I chose.

I didn't "squeeze" 10 years out of the Xbox 360. Microsoft did. It's been dead to me for years. And how the hell is 760 SLI "double the money?" GTX 760's are $260.

In reply to

docLEXfisti

Since 7696 Days

Sorry, I paid EUR 460,- for my GTX670 - I thought the 760's were equal in price

In reply to

the only tyrant I accept is my inner voice [and my two kids ;)]

ultimate gamers threat: "Watch it, or I'll spoil you all!"

docLEXfisti

Since 7696 Days

New Dead Rising screens, looking forward to co-op with some of my friends, although the majority will buy a PS4 first

more at the link http://www.vg247.com/2013/09/18/dead-rising-3-new-...

In reply to

the only tyrant I accept is my inner voice [and my two kids ;)]

ultimate gamers threat: "Watch it, or I'll spoil you all!"

KORNdog

Since 6982 Days

I kinda wish they hadn't burnt all their resources on the amount of zombies on screen tbh. Cos the visuals are pretty "eh" due to it. A happy middle ground would have been better . This is the one game i'd pick up if i was buying an xbone though.

In reply to

GrimThorne

Since 7450 Days

Well I finally took a break from GTA long enough to hear the news about Ryse. It blows that they couldn't do 1080p, but at least they tried. They probably would have reached it with a little more time tinkering with optimization. Native 900p might be a deal breaker for some but if the Xbox One has a good upscaler then it's not going to be that bad. Especially for a launch game that originally was being developed for 360 and Kinect. They'll get to 1080p eventually.

@docLEX Great stuff, Dead Rising is lookin good!

In reply to

Doom_Bringer

Since 6901 Days

Dead Rising 3 seems to be running on a bloated engine that's good for nothing. Guess the programmers in Vancouver hacked something together that sucks at everything. Wish Crapcom had given these guys MT Frame Work

In reply to

BLackHawkodst

Since 6464 Days

coop is going to be soooooo much fun!

In reply to

Prepare To Drop!!

gym4life

Since 6103 Days

Looks wacky and fun :)

In reply to

LEBATO

Since 7700 Days

Latest Xbox one rumor, the huge external powerbrick has another 8GB of RAM :)

In reply to

Mods, stop changing my SIG! I'm going to end up banning you!

GriftGFX

Since 7578 Days

^^You're being far too conservative.

Dead Rising 3 was an Xbox 360 game at one point. I think that has a lot to do with the look. The framerate though...

More zombies are never a bad thing anyway.

In reply to

Phaethon360

Since 7423 Days

Posted by LEBATO

Latest Xbox one rumor, the huge external powerbrick has another 8GB of RAM :)

In reply to

docLEXfisti

Since 7696 Days

Posted by LEBATO

Latest Xbox one rumor, the huge external powerbrick has another 8GB of RAM :)

Interestingly the brick ist having 254 Watts. That's a bit much for a supposedly "weak" console. The PS4's has 120 Watts. Why the big difference?

In reply to

the only tyrant I accept is my inner voice [and my two kids ;)]

ultimate gamers threat: "Watch it, or I'll spoil you all!"

KORNdog

Since 6982 Days

Posted by Phaethon360

looks weirdly like trevor from GTA5.

In reply to

docLEXfisti

Since 7696 Days

New Crimson Dragon trailer

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcAtN-03ZRM

In reply to

the only tyrant I accept is my inner voice [and my two kids ;)]

ultimate gamers threat: "Watch it, or I'll spoil you all!"

scoobs0688

Since 6212 Days

Posted by docLEXfisti

Interestingly the brick ist having 254 Watts. That's a bit much for a supposedly "weak" console. The PS4's has 120 Watts. Why the big difference?

Triple GPU + secret 32 GB of GDDR6 memory

In reply to

add me on steam: scoobs18@gmail.com
add me on PSN: scoobs0688

Currently playing: Counterstrike:GO, Skyrim, WoW:MoP, SC2

GrimThorne

Since 7450 Days

Posted by docLEXfisti

Interestingly the brick ist having 254 Watts. That's a bit much for a supposedly "weak" console. The PS4's has 120 Watts. Why the big difference?

It's 215W, 214.8 to be exact. The breakdown is 85/SoC, 20/Kinect, and an additional 10-15 for the system's other components like drive, player, charger etc.

215W represents the system's peak output so while the Xbox One IS consuming that wattage, it isn't likely that it runs at 215 continuously. For example, the original Xbox 360's peak output was 203W but it ran continuously at 185W.

I agree with you that the power efficiency in the PS4 is very surprising given that is has 6 more CUs and ACEs than the X1. The PS4 is only using a 120W? How the hell are they managing that? They're both at 28nm, there just shouldn't be that kind difference in power usage.

Maybe Microsoft didn't build the X1 as efficiently as they've been claiming because they wouldn't even need an additional 50W let alone the nearly 100W for output. Eh, it's nothing to be concerned about though. As long as it runs cool and quiet then it really doesn't matter.

In reply to

[quote=docLEXfisti]

Interestingly the brick ist having 254 Watts. That's a bit much for a supposedly "weak" console. The PS4's has 120 Watts. Why the big difference?[/quote]

It's 215W, 214.8 to be exact.   The breakdown is 85/SoC,  20/Kinect, and an additional 10-15 for the system's other components like drive, player, charger etc.

215W represents the system's peak output so while the Xbox One IS consuming that wattage, it isn't likely that it runs at 215 continuously.  For example, the original Xbox 360's peak output was 203W but it ran continuously at 185W.

I agree with you that the power efficiency in the PS4 is very surprising given that is has 6 more CUs and ACEs than the X1.  The PS4 is only using a 120W? How the hell are they managing that?  They're both at 28nm, there just shouldn't be that kind difference in power usage.

Maybe Microsoft didn't build the X1 as efficiently as they've been claiming because they wouldn't even need an additional 50W let alone the nearly 100W for output.  Eh, it's nothing to be concerned about though.  As long as it runs cool and quiet then it really doesn't matter.

docLEXfisti

Since 7696 Days

New info, Dead Rising 3 already locked at 30 fps

http://www.polygon.com/2013/9/20/4750936/dead-risi...

In reply to

the only tyrant I accept is my inner voice [and my two kids ;)]

ultimate gamers threat: "Watch it, or I'll spoil you all!"

alimokrane

Since 7508 Days

Posted by GrimThorne

It's 215W, 214.8 to be exact. The breakdown is 85/SoC, 20/Kinect, and an additional 10-15 for the system's other components like drive, player, charger etc.

215W represents the system's peak output so while the Xbox One IS consuming that wattage, it isn't likely that it runs at 215 continuously. For example, the original Xbox 360's peak output was 203W but it ran continuously at 185W.

I agree with you that the power efficiency in the PS4 is very surprising given that is has 6 more CUs and ACEs than the X1. The PS4 is only using a 120W? How the hell are they managing that? They're both at 28nm, there just shouldn't be that kind difference in power usage.

Maybe Microsoft didn't build the X1 as efficiently as they've been claiming because they wouldn't even need an additional 50W let alone the nearly 100W for output. Eh, it's nothing to be concerned about though. As long as it runs cool and quiet then it really doesn't matter.

Sony has WAY MORE experience in hardware design than Microsoft will ever have, that's why.

In reply to

[quote=GrimThorne]

It's 215W, 214.8 to be exact.   The breakdown is 85/SoC,  20/Kinect, and an additional 10-15 for the system's other components like drive, player, charger etc.

215W represents the system's peak output so while the Xbox One IS consuming that wattage, it isn't likely that it runs at 215 continuously.  For example, the original Xbox 360's peak output was 203W but it ran continuously at 185W.

I agree with you that the power efficiency in the PS4 is very surprising given that is has 6 more CUs and ACEs than the X1.  The PS4 is only using a 120W? How the hell are they managing that?  They're both at 28nm, there just shouldn't be that kind difference in power usage.

Maybe Microsoft didn't build the X1 as efficiently as they've been claiming because they wouldn't even need an additional 50W let alone the nearly 100W for output.  Eh, it's nothing to be concerned about though.  As long as it runs cool and quiet then it really doesn't matter.[/quote]

Sony has WAY MORE experience in hardware design than Microsoft will ever have, that's why.

rayy

Since 7552 Days

Posted by alimokrane

Sony has WAY MORE experience in hardware design than Microsoft will ever have, that's why.

I also read that the esram on the Xone increase a lot the transistor count on their soc. That's where the 5 billion transistor count that Microsoft say came from. That will consume more power and is more hotter than the PS4 soc. This is also the reason why Sony was able to make their GPU more powerful.

Xone need to power Kinect as well.

In reply to

docLEXfisti

Since 7696 Days

MGS on XO in 23 minutes, demoed by Hideo

http://live.nicovideo.jp/watch/lv152439809

In reply to

the only tyrant I accept is my inner voice [and my two kids ;)]

ultimate gamers threat: "Watch it, or I'll spoil you all!"

docLEXfisti

Since 7696 Days

New Killer Instinct trailer: SADIRA. With a sneak-peak of ORCHID at the end.

http://www.gamespot.com/tgs/killer-instinct-exclus...

I am really amazed by the SADIRA stuph. Sound, cutting, attention to detail and atmosphere are excellent.

In reply to

the only tyrant I accept is my inner voice [and my two kids ;)]

ultimate gamers threat: "Watch it, or I'll spoil you all!"