The XbOne Yard

Since 6981 Days

Posted by GriftGFX

It is, but it looks fine. That Ryse gif looks like Roman soldiers battling it out in Crysis.

With really shite animations. They need to sort out the animation blending. It ruins what is an otherwise nice looking game.

In reply to

BLackHawkodst

Since 6464 Days

Posted by Optimusv2

New footage of DR3

http://www.gamespot.com/dead-rising-3/videos/light...

Even better footage of DR3. Really get to see how good it looks, and how insane the game is. This is honestly THE video of dead rising 3 to watch probably.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttO1i8_Anxw

New BF4 on XB1 footage. Probably the best quality footage yet, which prob isn't saying much, but looks great.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEFiQt0nBQA

And new Ryse SP

emo_gp_au_100513_2800.mp4" target="_blank" >http://download.gamespotcdn.com/d6/gsc/2013/10/169...

All looking pretty damn good, imo. Ryse's graphics are pretty awesome. Gameplay looking better also. Some distracting clipping in places, though. Anyway, launch can't come soon enough, especially for Dead Rising 3.

Def look great!

In reply to

Prepare To Drop!!

Since 7696 Days

Xbox One no longer in amazon.de Top-100 charts from 27.9.-4.10. [PS4 console on 5th place and multiple other spots in different config's]

http://www.gamezone.de/Amazon-Firma-17639/News/Ama...

In reply to

the only tyrant I accept is my inner voice [and my two kids ;)]

ultimate gamers threat: "Watch it, or I'll spoil you all!"

Since 7523 Days

Is that for searches or purchases?

In reply to

scoobs0688

Since 6212 Days

they probably sold out of their allocations so they cant sell anymore.. not worth pointing out imo.

In reply to

add me on steam: scoobs18@gmail.com
add me on PSN: scoobs0688

Currently playing: Counterstrike:GO, Skyrim, WoW:MoP, SC2

GrimThorne

Since 7449 Days

Posted by Phaethon360

-

OMG fucking hilarious!

Edit the links are down, sorry.

In reply to

Since 7696 Days

Posted by Eddy186

Is that for searches or purchases?

it's for purchases

In reply to

the only tyrant I accept is my inner voice [and my two kids ;)]

ultimate gamers threat: "Watch it, or I'll spoil you all!"

Since 7696 Days

Posted by scoobs0688

they probably sold out of their allocations so they cant sell anymore.. not worth pointing out imo.

It's not sold out, only the day one edition is. You can still order the two others [CoD edition, plain Edition]. But I guess a lot of people will switch over after launch, when they see the difference in games.

This is my opinion, as I have seen most games live and don't see the 40 % power advantage of PS4 at all. The multiplats will be interesting to see, to spot the real differences. But I couldn't afford both of them at launch anyway, because Castle Grayskull is also coming in November and I have to buy my kids a Wii U for X-Mas as well. PS4 will have to wait until Q1 2014, when more interesting games will arrive in my case.

In reply to

the only tyrant I accept is my inner voice [and my two kids ;)]

ultimate gamers threat: "Watch it, or I'll spoil you all!"

Since 7523 Days

ugh, Wii U is pretty lame

In reply to

raina

Since 5390 Days

Posted by LEBATO

Acert, normally you use your brain in rational ways, normally...

The main problem I have is that *suddenly* perfection IS the standard expectation, and I also don't feel like you are applying the same standard everywhere. I think they are fair questions, but the level of execution you expect (perfection) just because the console is expensive, or because it's "next gen", is ridiculous. I'd love it for you to keep that mentality across the board. I can think of ZERO other racing game out there that have the stuff you mention -- out or upcoming (P CARS is trying, we'll see how it goes--right now it's not looking good, but that's another topic).

You know an Enzo is a very very expensive supercar, but I think it's pathetic that it doesn't have a radio. How can that piece of crap be considered a car without a radio?! I feel like Ferrari is looking at me like I'm stupid, they are actually taking away content that was already in my previous Ferrari! Surely the more money I throw at things, it must get me more. Does the Enzo even have cupholders? Oh man, if it doesn't....phff...

Lol Prefection ?

Foza5 upgrade to next gen is average. I have played F1 2006 on PS2 and my first game F1 CE on PS3 released some 6yrs ago had mind blowing gfx. I couldn't believe the gfx of this game. Even to date it looks good and better than many racing games. This was 6yrs ago: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYm_AvYSXaY
Rain gameplay at 1:44 driver cokcpit view:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1gUbersmqU

They already had good car models, in practice they used higher LOD with 4xaa and on race lower. I would think this time at least it is constant across all modes and are using menu LOD. Just add better textures, HDR, bloom filter etc which PC mods can do in months and Crytek did it for Crysis2. This game is basically a Forza4 clone. I think it is shame the game is compared to current gen. But we will see in few months if they have improved the gfx

In reply to

[quote=LEBATO]Acert, normally you use your brain in rational ways, normally...

The main problem I have is that *suddenly* perfection IS the standard expectation, and I also don't feel like you are applying the same standard everywhere.  I think they are fair questions, but the level of execution you expect (perfection) just because the console is expensive, or because it's "next gen", is ridiculous.  I'd love it for you to keep that mentality across the board.  I can think of ZERO other racing game out there that have the stuff you mention -- out or upcoming (P CARS is trying, we'll see how it goes--right now it's not looking good, but that's another topic).

You know an Enzo is a very very expensive supercar, but I think it's pathetic that it doesn't have a radio.  How can that piece of crap be considered a car without a radio?!  I feel like Ferrari is looking at me like I'm stupid, they are actually taking away content that was already in my previous Ferrari!  Surely the more money I throw at things, it must get me more.  Does the Enzo even have cupholders?  Oh man, if it doesn't....phff...[/quote]

Lol Prefection ?

Foza5 upgrade to next gen is average. I have played F1 2006 on PS2 and my first game F1 CE on PS3 released some 6yrs ago had mind blowing gfx. I couldn't believe the gfx of this game. Even to date it looks good and better than many racing games. This was 6yrs ago: [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYm_AvYSXaY[/url]
Rain gameplay at 1:44 driver cokcpit view:
[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1gUbersmqU[/url]

They already had good car models, in practice they used higher LOD with 4xaa and on race lower. I would think this time at least it is constant across all modes and are using menu LOD. Just add better textures, HDR, bloom filter etc which PC mods can do in months and Crytek did it for Crysis2. This game is basically a Forza4 clone. I think it is shame the game is compared to current gen. But we will see in few months if they have improved the gfx

Playstation, pushing the boundries of Play.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7fMRYPZ4Jek

ManThatYouFear

Since 7521 Days

Posted by KORNdog

With really shite animations. They need to sort out the animation blending. It ruins what is an otherwise nice looking game.

really? i love the animation in it, looks a nice game.

Still will not get to play it for about 2-3 years though.

In reply to

PSN:ManThatYouFear
GT: ManThatYouFear
Steam: Psn_ManThatYouFear
Real Life: ThatTwat

Since 7696 Days

Xbox One automatically records achievements
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/news/a521766/xb...

Crytek CEO: Ryse wouldn’t have run at 1080p on PS4; decision was choice, not hurdle
http://gearnuke.com/crytek-ceo-ryse-wouldnt-have-r...

More Battlefield 4 on Xbox One gameplay
http://www.product-reviews.net/2013/10/06/battlefi...

In reply to

the only tyrant I accept is my inner voice [and my two kids ;)]

ultimate gamers threat: "Watch it, or I'll spoil you all!"

Since 6981 Days

Posted by docLEXfisti

Crytek CEO: Ryse wouldn’t have run at 1080p on PS4; decision was choice, not hurdle
http://gearnuke.com/crytek-ceo-ryse-wouldnt-have-r...

Lol. So he's saying they would have sacrificed resolution for graphics even if it was on PS4

What i want to know, is if the graphics where the same, would PS4 run it at 1080p...based on graphic card benchmarks...i'm thinking yes.

Also, how is it not a hurdle? Do they expect us to believe, from day 1, pre-production they sat down and said "we're going for 900p and upscaling, cos it's better then 1080p native? BULLSHIT! They hit a wall and made a compromise.

Q/ What looks like a hurdle and sounds like a hurdle, and possibly even tastes like a hurdle?
A/ a hurdle!

In reply to

BLackHawkodst

Since 6464 Days

Posted by docLEXfisti

Xbox One automatically records achievements
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/news/a521766/xb...

Like the sound of that :)

In reply to

Prepare To Drop!!

GrimThorne

Since 7449 Days

Posted by KORNdog

Why are you letting this bother you so much? You're overreacting just like the people in that twitter conversation. He's only saying that if Ryse was on the PS4 they wouldn't have changed anything. They would have made the same choices for enhanced shaders over screen fidelity. He said their reasons were for efficiency, he never once said anything negative about the PS4.

In reply to

Tinks

Since 7507 Days

Posted by Optimusv2

This is generally how I feel about all these next gen threads going on right now. Nothing else for people to talk about I guess

In reply to

Since 6981 Days

Posted by GrimThorne

he never once said anything negative about the PS4.

I know he never, don't recall saying he did?. I'm simply questioning his BS in regards to it being a choice rather then a hurdle. If they could, they'd be doing both, the fact they're not just means a compromise had to be made...IQ over visuals.

In reply to

Since 7523 Days

Too bad there isn't a feature to ban certain people from certain threads.

In reply to

Since 6981 Days

Posted by Eddy186

Too bad there isn't a feature to ban certain people from certain threads.

i know right. come on Gsyde, make it happen!

In reply to

sanex

Since 5765 Days

Posted by Eddy186

Too bad there isn't a feature to ban certain people from certain threads.

Yeps, especially the folks that have no interest in the subject/thread and just come in to stealth troll.

In reply to

GriftGFX

Since 7577 Days

Gamersyde definitely needs more circle jerking. Positive posts only folks!

In reply to

Since 7523 Days

Posted by GriftGFX

Gamersyde definitely needs more circle jerking. Positive posts only folks!

I'm not saying there should only be positive posts; however, we all know there are certain folks who only post negative things on certain threads.

Posted by sanex

Yeps, especially the folks that have no interest in the subject/thread and just come in to stealth troll.

Well I guess you could consider my post unnecessary and you could also consider me a stealth troll for posting that comment.

Maybe a cool down timer could be implemented? For example, if someone posts unnecessary comments in a thread they cannot post in the same thread for a specific duration. Kinda like this comment. :P
Or instead of giving complete control to the moderators have it as a like/dislike feature. Where if a certain % of users who have posted on the thread (whatever method works best) dislike a comment, the originator of the comment would be on a cool down timer. If the function is being misused or someone's comment is disliked with no reason then the moderators have the ultimate say.

In reply to

[quote=GriftGFX]Gamersyde definitely needs more circle jerking. Positive posts only folks![/quote]

I'm not saying there should only be positive posts; however, we all know there are certain folks who only post negative things on certain threads.

[quote=sanex]Yeps, especially the folks that have no interest in the subject/thread and just come in to stealth troll.[/quote]

Well I guess you could consider my post unnecessary and you could also consider me a stealth troll for posting that comment.

Maybe a cool down timer could be implemented? For example, if someone posts unnecessary comments in a thread they cannot post in the same thread for a specific duration. Kinda like this comment. :P 
Or instead of giving complete control to the moderators have it as a like/dislike feature. Where if a certain % of users who have posted on the thread (whatever method works best) dislike a comment, the originator of the comment would be on a cool down timer. If the function is being misused or someone's comment is disliked with no reason then the moderators have the ultimate say.