Console HARDWARE & Specs Discussion Thread | Mine is Bigger - Main forum

KORNdog

Since 6650 Days

Posted by volvicstraw

Who said there captures were shit?

no-one said it...jackfrags footage SHOWS it

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=8794075...

In reply to

volvicstraw

Since 5252 Days

Where's the link to that footage so I can watch it?

In reply to

KORNdog

Since 6650 Days

Posted by volvicstraw

Where's the link to that footage so I can watch it?

GriftGFX

Since 7246 Days

Posted by GangStarr

PS4 version

lol.. compression.. now we're getting ridiculous.

I've been playing the game for five hours. It's pretty good so far. I love Flood Zone.

In reply to

volvicstraw

Since 5252 Days

Posted by KORNdog

In reply to

rayy

Since 7220 Days

After, checking this comparison PS4 version definitely have the edge on this one. 8fonn.gif" target="_blank" >http://abload.de/img/i3uk6taw6td8fonn.gif

Better resolution, more aliasing, better drag distance, better frame rates. We will have to wait until released date for better comparison but for now PS4 have better IQ.

Next will be COD.

That say Xone still looks good enough.

In reply to

hijab

Since 5038 Days

Pretty shitty job by dice. I guess for the next game they can do much better job.

In reply to

KORNdog

Since 6650 Days

http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Battlefield-4-PC-238...

PC vs PS4

and this is from the same people, although as i'm sure grift will agree, lol @ being the same

"That's an enthusiast PC gaming site. Translation for non-German Gaf:

They're saying that it's almost impossible to see a difference between PS4 and PC version. They compared it to BF4 running on a high-end PC with a "pretty expensive Radeon card". They're also expecting that if you're an owner of a PC that costs less than 1000€ then it will look worse than on PS4 if you want to target 60fps. 60fps is almost perfectly available in PS4 version. Given the low price of the PS4, they say that this definitely speaks for the console and against the PC version. In this video the PS4 version looks brighter due to the recording that they're using. There are some effects like water drops on the windscreen that are missing in the PC version even though they are available for PS4. Shadows, level of detail, etc are indistinguishable. Game runs smoothly even in "bombastic scenes"

The conclusion: They're recommending the PS4 version because of the 400€ price point for the hardware."

In reply to

http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Battlefield-4-PC-238749/Videos/Battlefield-4-Vergleichsvideo-PC-vs-PS4-x-Wie-gut-ist-Next-Gen-wirklich-1094755/

PC vs PS4

and this is from the same people, although as i'm sure grift will agree, lol @ being the same

"That's an enthusiast PC gaming site. Translation for non-German Gaf:

They're saying that it's almost impossible to see a difference between PS4 and PC version. They compared it to BF4 running on a high-end PC with a "pretty expensive Radeon card". They're also expecting that if you're an owner of a PC that costs less than 1000€ then it will look worse than on PS4 if you want to target 60fps. 60fps is almost perfectly available in PS4 version. Given the low price of the PS4, they say that this definitely speaks for the console and against the PC version. In this video the PS4 version looks brighter due to the recording that they're using. There are some effects like water drops on the windscreen that are missing in the PC version even though they are available for PS4. Shadows, level of detail, etc are indistinguishable. Game runs smoothly even in "bombastic scenes"

The conclusion: They're recommending the PS4 version because of the 400€ price point for the hardware."

rayy

Since 7220 Days

Posted by hijab

Pretty shitty job by dice. I guess for the next game they can do much better job.

Why is pretty shitty job by them? The hardware they are getting with this consoles are not that great to be honest and is a launch game.

In reply to

GangStarr

Since 6306 Days

I am really disappointed with the eurogamer comparison videos ... they fail to point out that the x1 build is heavily unoptimized. The build is 10 weeks old lacks kinect and multi player elements. And the biggest fail of all is the 1.8gb patch that will have to be download at launch. The game is shipping with 1080p 60fps v-sync.
I think eurogamer will change this semi review come final hardware and code..

In reply to

KORNdog

Since 6650 Days

Posted by GangStarr

I am really disappointed with the eurogamer comparison videos ... they fail to point out that the x1 build is heavily unoptimized. The build is 10 weeks old lacks kinect and multi player elements. And the biggest fail of all is the 1.8gb patch that will have to be download at launch. The game is shipping with 1080p 60fps v-sync.
I think eurogamer will change this semi review come final hardware and code..

who the fuck said that...lol

In reply to

Seth

Since 6332 Days

Source pls. I hope it's not this ignorant twitter dude kevin.

In reply to

GrimThorne

Since 7118 Days

So after all the noise both versions are sub-1080? If this is what people are going to be doing for every single game that's released this generation then they're going to drive themselves insane.

In reply to

KORNdog

Since 6650 Days

Posted by GrimThorne

So after all the noise both versions are sub-1080? If this is what people are going to be doing for every single game that's released this generation then they're going to drive themselves insane.

i dunno, once a clear pattern starts to form (which it will), then it'll be much like this gen...one group will come to expect better ports, the other group will come to expect lesser ports, making such "hardcore" camparisons pointless.

until then thought...we're in for a good few months of fun.

In reply to

sanex

Since 5434 Days

Posted by GrimThorne

So after all the noise both versions are sub-1080? If this is what people are going to be doing for every single game that's released this generation then they're going to drive themselves insane.

lol yeps.

In reply to

GriftGFX

Since 7246 Days

Posted by hijab

Pretty shitty job by dice. I guess for the next game they can do much better job.

How? The game is pretty demanding. And it asks for a lot of CPU resources too.

I think they did fine. Just wait until you see the rest of the multiplatform launch window stuff.

Posted by KORNdog

They're saying that it's almost impossible to see a difference between PS4 and PC version. They compared it to BF4 running on a high-end PC with a "pretty expensive Radeon card". They're also expecting that if you're an owner of a PC that costs less than 1000€ then it will look worse than on PS4 if you want to target 60fps. 60fps is almost perfectly available in PS4 version. Given the low price of the PS4, they say that this definitely speaks for the console and against the PC version. In this video the PS4 version looks brighter due to the recording that they're using. There are some effects like water drops on the windscreen that are missing in the PC version even though they are available for PS4. Shadows, level of detail, etc are indistinguishable. Game runs smoothly even in "bombastic scenes"

lol.. that's a stretch. A single 760 or 7970 will do 1080p/60 in this game pretty nicely with a good CPU behind it.

In reply to

[quote=hijab]Pretty shitty job by dice. I guess for the next game they can do much better job.[/quote]

How? The game is pretty demanding. And it asks for a lot of CPU resources too.

I think they did fine. Just wait until you see the rest of the multiplatform launch window stuff.

[quote=KORNdog]They're saying that it's almost impossible to see a difference between PS4 and PC version. They compared it to BF4 running on a high-end PC with a "pretty expensive Radeon card". They're also expecting that if you're an owner of a PC that costs less than 1000€ then it will look worse than on PS4 if you want to target 60fps. 60fps is almost perfectly available in PS4 version. Given the low price of the PS4, they say that this definitely speaks for the console and against the PC version. In this video the PS4 version looks brighter due to the recording that they're using. There are some effects like water drops on the windscreen that are missing in the PC version even though they are available for PS4. Shadows, level of detail, etc are indistinguishable. Game runs smoothly even in "bombastic scenes"[/quote]

lol.. that's a stretch. A single 760 or 7970 will do 1080p/60 in this game pretty nicely with a good CPU behind it.

GrimThorne

Since 7118 Days

Posted by hijab

Pretty shitty job by dice. I guess for the next game they can do much better job.

This is what I'm thinking too. Nothing really stands out for me in ANY of the versions of this game.

In reply to

Jin187

Since 6990 Days

I think the game looks great on both, not sure why DICE are gettting hate.

XO has better textures textures overall but the PS4 version is smoother with better AA. Not sure why the XO version looks sharper at a lower resolution though, I thought the PS4 had hardware scalling too?

In reply to

KORNdog

Since 6650 Days

Posted by Jin187

I think the game looks great on both, not sure why DICE are gettting hate.

XO has better textures textures overall but the PS4 version is smoother with better AA. Not sure why the XO version looks sharper at a lower resolution though, I thought the PS4 had hardware scalling too?

xbone version has some sort of sharpening filter. people have done experiments, a single "sharpen more" filter in photoshop of the PS4 screen ends up exceeding that of the xbone screens. it's weird. people arn't sure whether it's a filter the console applies, or whether it has been applied after? either way, if it's just a case of sharpness, you could fix that on your TV. plus, DF captures are wank. they make PS4 look blurry, and they make Xbone look dark as hell. other places this isn't a problem.

In reply to

Nietzsche

Since 6599 Days

After watching all these comparison videos I'm surprised how much I notice the x1 version's superior textures. It really is distracting how blurry the ps4 textures are, but then you have the worse aliasing on x1 with lower frame rate, but the x1 version has deeper blacks with better looking color contrast.

I was really hoping the ps4 version was going to have better textures without that smeared texture issue like killzone, that is my biggest gripe.

But all the nitpicking crap aside I think the game looks pretty damn awesome for a $400 machine so who am I to whine like a little bitch.

I'm still too busy lmao at the retarded shit the mega fanboys like gangstarr and Korndog keep posting lol. Comic gold.

In reply to

scoobs0688

Since 5881 Days

Looks like they're investiagting the color/contrat issues at DF

So what's going on with Xbox One?

Xbox One was also acquired at full range 0-255 RGB with the dash set accordingly, in line with the other versions - exactly how we approach every Face-Off. We have now had informal confirmation from a very good source that current Xbox One hardware has issues with full-range RGB output that are not present on either PC or PS4. We asked DICE for comment and were told that they are "investigating the video output range and settings for Xbox One".

In reply to

add me on steam: scoobs18@gmail.com
add me on PSN: scoobs0688

Currently playing: Counterstrike:GO, Skyrim, WoW:MoP, SC2

BLackHawkodst

Since 6133 Days

Posted by GrimThorne

So after all the noise both versions are sub-1080? If this is what people are going to be doing for every single game that's released this generation then they're going to drive themselves insane.

It always happens and always will :)

Is this the result of you processing the footage to make it look better compared to PlayStation 4?

Um, you don't make a game look better by crushing subtle detail. The lowering of dynamic range like this physically can't make a game look better - it can only look worse. The only regret here is that the drive for the best possible assets has resulted in captures that do not fully represent how DICE wants the game to be played.

In reply to

Prepare To Drop!!

scoobs0688

Since 5881 Days

Posted by scoobs0688

Looks like they're investiagting the color/contrat issues at DF

So what's going on with Xbox One?

Xbox One was also acquired at full range 0-255 RGB with the dash set accordingly, in line with the other versions - exactly how we approach every Face-Off. We have now had informal confirmation from a very good source that current Xbox One hardware has issues with full-range RGB output that are not present on either PC or PS4. We asked DICE for comment and were told that they are "investigating the video output range and settings for Xbox One".

Link to article: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-b...

In reply to

add me on steam: scoobs18@gmail.com
add me on PSN: scoobs0688

Currently playing: Counterstrike:GO, Skyrim, WoW:MoP, SC2

sanex

Since 5434 Days

Posted by BLackHawkodst

Is this the result of you processing the footage to make it look better compared to PlayStation 4?

Um, you don't make a game look better by crushing subtle detail. The lowering of dynamic range like this physically can't make a game look better - it can only look worse. The only regret here is that the drive for the best possible assets has resulted in captures that do not fully represent how DICE wants the game to be played.

Where is that from??

In reply to

scoobs0688

Since 5881 Days

Posted by sanex

Where is that from??

Check my link.

In reply to

add me on steam: scoobs18@gmail.com
add me on PSN: scoobs0688

Currently playing: Counterstrike:GO, Skyrim, WoW:MoP, SC2

Console HARDWARE & Specs Discussion Thread | Mine is Bigger

Eriksholm: The Stolen Dream

Donkey Kong Bananza

The Drifter

Japanese Drift Master slides on Gamersyde

Exploring Mexican caves in Kayak VR: Mirage

Synth Riders is still awesome