The XbOne Yard

Inscrit depuis 6467 Jours

Posté par gym4life

Forza dose look great and i like the idea of this realistic driving AI, Ryse looks stunning but the gameplay dull, i can see myself becoming very bored unless it changes up a lot, i did hear mention of a big RPG skill tree for the main character? so i'll look to see and hear more. I posted that Quantum Break stuff yesterday :) have to say thats my most anticipated title.

Yeah QB really sounds great and looks amazing! :)

En réponse à

Prepare To Drop!!

Optimusv2

Inscrit depuis 7473 Jours

Yep, I'll eat some crow on the source engine. I doubted it the whole time. I never expected Titanfall would look that good. I expected a great game, but I didn't think it would look so great. I'm apparently eating a bit of crow this E3. Forza 5 1080p 60fps and looking as incredible as it does, I expected lower resolutions to pull off such quality. I'm genuinely interested in Ryse from Crytek and now planning to get it at launch, something I thought would literally be impossible before E3.

Oh, and this stuff below from Quantum Break is confirmed to be in-game graphics. All real-time, all in-game. Remedy is saying this is literally what the game looks like during gameplay. Third person action shooter. The full TV show ships with the game disc and your actions pretty much creates your own director's cut version of the tv show. 3 main characters, you even play the bad guy himself a little bit, which is designed in such a way that Remedy wants him to almost steal the show.

<0142>http://www.gametrailers.com/videos/ib9drm/quantum-break-e3-2013--storytelling-evolved---stream-

http://www.gametrailers.com/search?keywords=quantu... main link is acting up, so access the interview from the search page.

Crazy.

En réponse à

Yep, I'll eat some crow on the source engine. I doubted it the whole time. I never expected Titanfall would look that good. I expected a great game, but I didn't think it would look so great. I'm apparently eating a bit of crow this E3. Forza 5 1080p 60fps and looking as incredible as it does, I expected lower resolutions to pull off such quality. I'm genuinely interested in Ryse from Crytek and now planning to get it at launch, something I thought would literally be impossible before E3.

Oh, and this stuff below from Quantum Break is confirmed to be in-game graphics. All real-time, all in-game. Remedy is saying this is literally what the game looks like during gameplay. Third person action shooter. The full TV show ships with the game disc and your actions pretty much creates your own director's cut version of the tv show. 3 main characters, you even play the bad guy himself a little bit, which is designed in such a way that Remedy wants him to almost steal the show.

http://www.gametrailers.com/videos/ib9drm/quantum-break-e3-2013--storytelling-evolved---stream-

http://www.gametrailers.com/search?keywords=quantum+break   main link is acting up, so access the interview from the search page.

Crazy.

[img]http://images.gamersyde.com/image_quantum_break-22372-2722_0002.jpg[/img]

[img]http://images.gamersyde.com/image_quantum_break-22372-2722_0004.jpg[/img]

[img]http://images.gamersyde.com/image_quantum_break-22372-2722_0003.jpg[/img]

Halo Reach using 360 tesselation unit extensively.

Hironobu Sakaguchi is coming back to reclaim the throne :)

Seeing it in motion on your HDTV, will blow your mind!!

Don't ask any questions just shut up and buy Halo : Ghosts of the Onyx one of th

Jollipop

Inscrit depuis 7463 Jours

Makes me happy, if Xbones can pull of graphics like that I can't imagine what PS4 will be capable of in a couple years time.

En réponse à

Marumaro for the WIN !!

gym4life

Inscrit depuis 6105 Jours

It's a "family" affair

Since its announcement, there has been some confusion over the details of sharing your Xbox One game library with up to ten "family members." Mehdi couldn't give comprehensive details but he did clarify some things.

For one, a family member doesn't have to be a "blood relative," he said, eliminating the extremely unlikely possibility that the Xbox One would include a built-in blood testing kit. For another, they don't have to live in the primary owner's house—I could name a friend that lives 3,000 miles away as one of my "family members" Mehdi said.

You'll be able to link other Xbox Live accounts as having shared access to your library when you first set up a system, and will also be able to add them later on (though specific details of how you manage these relationships is still not being discussed). The only limitation, it seems, is that only one person can be playing the shared copy of a single game at any given time. All in all, this does sound like a pretty convenient feature that's more workable than simply passing discs around amongst friends who are actually in your area.

Sounds better than i thought.

Posté par Optimusv2

The full TV show ships with the game disc and your actions pretty much creates your own director's cut version of the tv show.

Sounds interesting, so the show is on the disc.

En réponse à

[quote]It's a "family" affair

Since its announcement, there has been some confusion over the details of sharing your Xbox One game library with up to ten "family members." Mehdi couldn't give comprehensive details but he did clarify some things.

For one, a family member doesn't have to be a "blood relative," he said, eliminating the extremely unlikely possibility that the Xbox One would include a built-in blood testing kit. [b]For another, they don't have to live in the primary owner's house—I could name a friend that lives 3,000 miles away as one of my "family members" Mehdi said.[/b]

You'll be able to link other Xbox Live accounts as having shared access to your library when you first set up a system, and will also be able to add them later on (though specific details of how you manage these relationships is still not being discussed). The only limitation, it seems, is that only one person can be playing the shared copy of a single game at any given time. All in all, this does sound like a pretty convenient feature that's more workable than simply passing discs around amongst friends who are actually in your area.[/quote]

Sounds better than i thought.

[quote=Optimusv2]The full TV show ships with the game disc and your actions pretty much creates your own director's cut version of the tv show.
[/quote]

Sounds interesting, so the show is on the disc.

KORNdog

Inscrit depuis 6985 Jours

Posté par Phaethon360

I'd just like to point out how awesome the SOURCE engine looked in Titanfall. All you doubters and non-believers in the power of Source, get ye behind me!

the engine/visuals look pretty "eh". almost like it's running on the COD engine. the game however, looks awesome.

En réponse à

Jollipop

Inscrit depuis 7463 Jours

The only limitation, it seems, is that only one person can be playing the shared copy of a single game at any given time. All in all, this does sound like a pretty convenient feature that's more workable than simply passing discs around amongst friends who are actually in your area.

*Sends message*

"Dude get off my game, I just bought it and can't play it because you have been hogging it all day"

*Unshares library*

Doesn't sound very convenient to me.

En réponse à

Marumaro for the WIN !!

Phaethon360

Inscrit depuis 7426 Jours

Depending on how adding/removing people works this sounds interesting. Creating and joining rings of gamers to play each others games. I'm sure they've already thought of this, and might even go as far as to ban users they feel may be abusing the feature.

I don't really see how this helps increase publisher profits if I can just add anyone to my Family and let them play a game I'm not using though. So I'm sure it's nowhere near as enticing as it sounds.

Posté par DatGuyYouKnow

"Hey dude, you beat Ryse? Okay add me to your Family so I can beat it. Sweet, I ain't never gonna buy shit lol!"

En réponse à

gym4life

Inscrit depuis 6105 Jours

Yeah it sounds a bit to good to be true, will wait for more details.

En réponse à

alimokrane

Inscrit depuis 7511 Jours

Just remove this nonsense, full stop...overcomplicating things like this... It's unbelievable how much Microsoft just keeps pissing me off. Cancel online DRM and let me share my games the way God intended it, by actually giving it to someone....

I am tired of these huge bloody corporations trying to strip me of my God-damn-given rights of actually owning my stuff.....

En réponse à

Jollipop

Inscrit depuis 7463 Jours

God makes games now ?

En réponse à

Marumaro for the WIN !!

alimokrane

Inscrit depuis 7511 Jours

Posté par Jollipop

God makes games now ?

God makes everything (you are free to believe otherwise :) ) and I am talking about my right to share my stuff, that's a given right ;)

En réponse à

BLackHawkodst

Inscrit depuis 6467 Jours

[quote=gym4life]

It's a "family" affair

Since its announcement, there has been some confusion over the details of sharing your Xbox One game library with up to ten "family members." Mehdi couldn't give comprehensive details but he did clarify some things.

For one, a family member doesn't have to be a "blood relative," he said, eliminating the extremely unlikely possibility that the Xbox One would include a built-in blood testing kit. For another, they don't have to live in the primary owner's house—I could name a friend that lives 3,000 miles away as one of my "family members" Mehdi said.

You'll be able to link other Xbox Live accounts as having shared access to your library when you first set up a system, and will also be able to add them later on (though specific details of how you manage these relationships is still not being discussed). The only limitation, it seems, is that only one person can be playing the shared copy of a single game at any given time. All in all, this does sound like a pretty convenient feature that's more workable than simply passing discs around amongst friends who are actually in your area.

That sounds great if true, need to know more details though.

En réponse à

[quote=gym4life][quote]It's a "family" affair

Since its announcement, there has been some confusion over the details of sharing your Xbox One game library with up to ten "family members." Mehdi couldn't give comprehensive details but he did clarify some things.

For one, a family member doesn't have to be a "blood relative," he said, eliminating the extremely unlikely possibility that the Xbox One would include a built-in blood testing kit. [b]For another, they don't have to live in the primary owner's house—I could name a friend that lives 3,000 miles away as one of my "family members" Mehdi said.[/b]

You'll be able to link other Xbox Live accounts as having shared access to your library when you first set up a system, and will also be able to add them later on (though specific details of how you manage these relationships is still not being discussed). The only limitation, it seems, is that only one person can be playing the shared copy of a single game at any given time. All in all, this does sound like a pretty convenient feature that's more workable than simply passing discs around amongst friends who are actually in your area.[/quote]

That sounds great if true, need to know more details though.

Prepare To Drop!!

Jollipop

Inscrit depuis 7463 Jours

It might be silly but it almost sounds like localised piracy between friends or something, pretty strange :S (except we have permission to do it)

En réponse à

Marumaro for the WIN !!

Optimusv2

Inscrit depuis 7473 Jours

Posté par Jollipop

The only limitation, it seems, is that only one person can be playing the shared copy of a single game at any given time. All in all, this does sound like a pretty convenient feature that's more workable than simply passing discs around amongst friends who are actually in your area.

*Sends message*

"Dude get off my game, I just bought it and can't play it because you have been hogging it all day"

*Unshares library*

Doesn't sound very convenient to me.

Actually, the original owner is always safe and never blocked out of their own games. There are limitations placed on the shared copies, but not the original copies. Only one of your ten friends can be playing a shared copy of one of your games at any given time. It will never prevent you as the original owner from playing your own games, even if you should be playing your copy of Forza 5 at the exact same time that a friend is playing your shared copy of forza 5. The only people restricted are the other 9 people on your family share list who suddenly decide they want to play your shared games, too, only to realize that they can't because one person is already occupying the single shared game slot.

10 people can be on the list at the same time, but all 10 can't play at the same time. So there would never be a situation, for example, where myself and 2 of my friends are playing games belonging to me all at the same time. It's either a single friend by themselves, or the original owner and a single friend at the same time.

http://news.xbox.com/2013/06/license

You can always play your games, and any one of your family members can be playing from your shared library at a given time.

Original owner of the games will never be prevented from playing games that belong to them, even if a friend is currently sharing

En réponse à

[quote=Jollipop][quote][b]The only limitation, it seems, is that only one person can be playing the shared copy of a single game at any given time.[/b] All in all, this does sound like a pretty convenient feature that's more workable than simply passing discs around amongst friends who are actually in your area.[/quote]

*Sends message*

"Dude get off my game, I just bought it and can't play it because you have been hogging it all day"

*Unshares library*

Doesn't sound very convenient to me.[/quote]

Actually, the original owner is always safe and never blocked out of their own games. There are limitations placed on the [b]shared[/b] copies, but not the [b]original[/b] copies. Only one of your ten friends can be playing a shared copy of one of your games at any given time. It will never prevent you as the original owner from playing your own games, even if you should be playing your copy of Forza 5 at the exact same time that a friend is playing your [b]shared[/b] copy of forza 5. The only people restricted are the other 9 people on your family share list who suddenly decide they want to play your shared games, too, only to realize that they can't because one person is already occupying the single shared game slot.

10 people can be on the list at the same time, but all 10 can't play at the same time. So there would never be a situation, for example, where myself and 2 of my friends are playing games belonging to me all at the same time. It's either a single friend by themselves, or the original owner and a single friend at the same time.

http://news.xbox.com/2013/06/license

[quote][b]You can always play your games[/b], and any one of your family members can be playing from your shared library at a given time.
[/quote]

Original owner of the games will never be prevented from playing games that belong to them, even if a friend is currently sharing

Halo Reach using 360 tesselation unit extensively.

Hironobu Sakaguchi is coming back to reclaim the throne :)

Seeing it in motion on your HDTV, will blow your mind!!

Don't ask any questions just shut up and buy Halo : Ghosts of the Onyx one of th

rayy

Inscrit depuis 7554 Jours

Don Mattrick on people who don't have a internet connection at their disposal

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedd...

What I hate the most about this online checking is that I always like to take my console with me on trips. This mean I won't be able to play my games on places that don't have a internet connection available.

It is a really stupid policy.

En réponse à

Jollipop

Inscrit depuis 7463 Jours

Posté par Optimusv2

Actually, the original owner is always safe and never blocked out of their own games. There are limitations placed on the shared copies, but not the original copies. Only one of your ten friends can be playing a shared copy of one of your games at any given time. It will never prevent you as the original owner from playing your own games, even if you should be playing your copy of Forza 5 at the exact same time that a friend is playing your shared copy of forza 5. The only people restricted are the other 9 people on your family share list who suddenly decide they want to play your shared games, too, only to realize that they can't because one person is already occupying the single shared game slot.

10 people can be on the list at the same time, but all 10 can't play at the same time. So there would never be a situation, for example, where myself and 2 of my friends are playing games belonging to me all at the same time. It's either a single friend by themselves, or the original owner and a single friend at the same time.

Ahh thats not so bad I guess, it's still pretty convoluted though.

En réponse à

[quote=Optimusv2]

Actually, the original owner is always safe and never blocked out of their own games. There are limitations placed on the [b]shared[/b] copies, but not the [b]original[/b] copies. Only one of your ten friends can be playing a shared copy of one of your games at any given time. It will never prevent you as the original owner from playing your own games, even if you should be playing your copy of Forza 5 at the exact same time that a friend is playing your [b]shared[/b] copy of forza 5. The only people restricted are the other 9 people on your family share list who suddenly decide they want to play your shared games, too, only to realize that they can't because one person is already occupying the single shared game slot.

10 people can be on the list at the same time, but all 10 can't play at the same time. So there would never be a situation, for example, where myself and 2 of my friends are playing games belonging to me all at the same time. It's either a single friend by themselves, or the original owner and a single friend at the same time.[/quote]

Ahh thats not so bad I guess, it's still pretty convoluted though.

Marumaro for the WIN !!

GriftGFX

Inscrit depuis 7580 Jours

Posté par Jollipop

it's still pretty convoluted though.

Just a little.. and I don't think we even are completely getting it yet. After having it explained several times. That's not a good sign.

Posté par rayy

Don Mattrick on people who don't have a internet connection at their disposal

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedd...

This guy is such a colossally out of touch cunt.

En réponse à

Phaethon360

Inscrit depuis 7426 Jours

I get it now. Not all that appealing then if only 1/10 can play your games, but at least it makes sense. One copy effectively becoming too is beneficial, but the clause that says that if you give ownership to someone else they can't give ownership to anyone else is the kicker. Not really two copies at all.

En réponse à

Jollipop

Inscrit depuis 7463 Jours

Posté par Phaethon360

I get it now. Not all that appealing then if only 1/10 can play your games, but at least it makes sense. Doesn't really counteract the lending argument, since if I gave 10 of my games away now people could play them whenever, not one at a time.

Agreed, it more like lending your account than your games.

How they came up with this is mind boggling.

En réponse à

Marumaro for the WIN !!

alimokrane

Inscrit depuis 7511 Jours

Posté par GriftGFX

This guy is such a colossally out of touch cunt.

I like you mate! ;)

En réponse à

rayy

Inscrit depuis 7554 Jours

Posté par GriftGFX

This guy is such a colossally out of touch cunt.

He is!

I'm glad there is a better offline console than the 360 and is call PS4 :D

En réponse à

Optimusv2

Inscrit depuis 7473 Jours

Posté par Phaethon360

I get it now. Not all that appealing then if only 1/10 can play your games, but at least it makes sense. Doesn't really counteract the lending argument, since if I gave 10 of my games away now people could play them whenever, not one at a time.

True, but each game given away removes it from your share list, as you would no longer be the owner of that disc.

Want a nice strategy? Gamers can organize on a weekly or even monthly basis only giving a single person access to their game share.

Alright, Phaethon borrowed my copy of Forza 5 over family share last week, so this week, jolly has exclusive access to it.
Phaethon could also give jolly exclusive access to his copy of quantum break.
Grift could give Phaeth exclusive access to his copy of Battlefield.

Basically, you could easily see a dedicated thread where people are asking, "Hey, who has a copy of quantum break they want to share with me?" A person responds and then gives that person exclusive access. Could be an interesting system if managed and organized via a forum. People would become their own gamestop/blockbuster/gamefly LOL.

Then I could charge phaethon a shipping and handling fee, even though shipping the product would cost me nothing. :)

En réponse à

[quote=Phaethon360]I get it now. Not all that appealing then if only 1/10 can play your games, but at least it makes sense. Doesn't really counteract the lending argument, since if I gave 10 of my games away now people could play them whenever, not one at a time.[/quote]

True, but each game given away removes it from your share list, as you would no longer be the owner of that disc.

Want a nice strategy? Gamers can organize on a weekly or even monthly basis only giving a single person access to their game share.

Alright, Phaethon borrowed my copy of Forza 5 over family share last week, so this week, jolly has exclusive access to it. 
Phaethon could also give jolly exclusive access to his copy of quantum break.
Grift could give Phaeth exclusive access to his copy of Battlefield.

Basically, you could easily see a dedicated thread where people are asking, "Hey, who has a copy of quantum break they want to share with me?" A person responds and then gives that person exclusive access. Could be an interesting system if managed and organized via a forum. People would become their own gamestop/blockbuster/gamefly LOL.

Then I could charge phaethon a shipping and handling fee, even though shipping the product would cost me nothing. :)

Halo Reach using 360 tesselation unit extensively.

Hironobu Sakaguchi is coming back to reclaim the throne :)

Seeing it in motion on your HDTV, will blow your mind!!

Don't ask any questions just shut up and buy Halo : Ghosts of the Onyx one of th

Dacs

Inscrit depuis 7655 Jours

I'm guessing/assuming that each of of the 'family members' will require an XBL Gold membership.

En réponse à

Optimusv2

Inscrit depuis 7473 Jours

Posté par Dacs

I'm guessing/assuming that each of of the 'family members' will require an XBL Gold membership.

Not the plan. Would be very foolish move. If they do that, might as well force gold for someone to access their own games from the cloud on a separate xbox one located in a different location.

En réponse à

Halo Reach using 360 tesselation unit extensively.

Hironobu Sakaguchi is coming back to reclaim the throne :)

Seeing it in motion on your HDTV, will blow your mind!!

Don't ask any questions just shut up and buy Halo : Ghosts of the Onyx one of th

GriftGFX

Inscrit depuis 7580 Jours

I love how everything on the internet is "the cloud."

Marketing really destroyed any real meaning that word had in tech.

Unlimited powa!

En réponse à

Deer & Boy

Star Fox

Rhythm Paradise Groove

Notre vidéo Switch 2 de Xenoblade Chronicles

SnowRunner désormais sur Switch 2

GSY Review : Final Fantasy VII Rebirth Switch 2